AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,2/10
3,1 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um drama romântico politicamente carregado ambientado no início dos anos 60, no qual uma mulher sofisticada retorna à sua cidade natal do sul e descobre que suas opções são limitadas, mas a ... Ler tudoUm drama romântico politicamente carregado ambientado no início dos anos 60, no qual uma mulher sofisticada retorna à sua cidade natal do sul e descobre que suas opções são limitadas, mas a discriminação é abundante.Um drama romântico politicamente carregado ambientado no início dos anos 60, no qual uma mulher sofisticada retorna à sua cidade natal do sul e descobre que suas opções são limitadas, mas a discriminação é abundante.
Henry G. Sanders
- Abel
- (as Henry Sanders)
Hendrix Kate Yancey
- Angelina
- (as Hendrix Yancey)
Avaliações em destaque
It's 1963. Grace Gordon (Anna Friel) has come home to the deep south after the death of her powerful judge father. She finds that the family fortune had all been spent on her. With no money left, her only option is to remarry to someone rich. Her sights eventually settles on the Congressman (Kelsey Grammer). Meanwhile, the hated civil rights movement has come to the southern community.
The movie starts with the hammer blow "useless female" declaration. The next move should be showing Grace as a smart modern woman. Instead, the movie only re-enforces the useless female idea by having her ignore her bills and being completely clueless about her finances. She is utterly flighty and every bit the useless female. It is probably the exact opposite of what this movie needs. It's a bad start.
Over time, the movie does put in little bits of the civil rights movement. The general concept changes from a rom-com movie to a social justice movie. It functions better as such especially since the romance between Grace and the Congressman is never going to take off. That's another issue. The Congressman has no name. It seems like a fictional movie which is too scared to put in a real name. I don't know why they couldn't put in a fictional name.
The movie starts with the hammer blow "useless female" declaration. The next move should be showing Grace as a smart modern woman. Instead, the movie only re-enforces the useless female idea by having her ignore her bills and being completely clueless about her finances. She is utterly flighty and every bit the useless female. It is probably the exact opposite of what this movie needs. It's a bad start.
Over time, the movie does put in little bits of the civil rights movement. The general concept changes from a rom-com movie to a social justice movie. It functions better as such especially since the romance between Grace and the Congressman is never going to take off. That's another issue. The Congressman has no name. It seems like a fictional movie which is too scared to put in a real name. I don't know why they couldn't put in a fictional name.
I am a huge fan of Kelsey Grammer, and watched it for that reason. Then the story about how a first time writer/director, and the owner of the OK Cafe (which is very, very good in Atlanta) was intriguing. The making of it is far more interesting than the film however.
I have a hard time with films that pretend to be historical, but don't actually use the factual history to tell the story, like this one. Additionally, it is slow, dry in many spots, an 'off' view of how black folks operate. Its an updated new of Gone with the Wind, that should have been left alone. It is in some ways, just as insulting, though you can tell it is trying very hard not to be, and yet, still . . .
There is so much emotional confusion in the main character for too long, and her clarity has no hard defining moments but is as namely pam-by as she is. The script is very weak, though the acting is strong. The Director has a 'type' in casting black women, so two key characters look too much alike, when in fact black people come in a range of appearances. The conflict between the people of all colors, within their own race and class is incredibly superficial and shallow, so it loses any power it might have had if handled better. The lack of understanding about the power of the script sinks this film into humdrum land, and just makes the view wait for the end.
The Writer/Director gets an A for effort, and perhaps her next film will be better, if she hires a real scriptwriter. Her directing was passable though.
I have a hard time with films that pretend to be historical, but don't actually use the factual history to tell the story, like this one. Additionally, it is slow, dry in many spots, an 'off' view of how black folks operate. Its an updated new of Gone with the Wind, that should have been left alone. It is in some ways, just as insulting, though you can tell it is trying very hard not to be, and yet, still . . .
There is so much emotional confusion in the main character for too long, and her clarity has no hard defining moments but is as namely pam-by as she is. The script is very weak, though the acting is strong. The Director has a 'type' in casting black women, so two key characters look too much alike, when in fact black people come in a range of appearances. The conflict between the people of all colors, within their own race and class is incredibly superficial and shallow, so it loses any power it might have had if handled better. The lack of understanding about the power of the script sinks this film into humdrum land, and just makes the view wait for the end.
The Writer/Director gets an A for effort, and perhaps her next film will be better, if she hires a real scriptwriter. Her directing was passable though.
The title makes it sound like a romantic comedy, but it is much more than that. It tells how important history is made. I think the acting is good in this film.
...between Kelsey Grammer and Anna Friel. But the acting overall is strong. Some of the supporting cast are particularly interesting and would have liked to have more on screen time. These characters would probably work well in a series or sequel.
Always nice to see Sean Astin pop up in a movie. He and his counterpart in the pawn shop would make a hilarious duo in a longer series. Also the chemistry between the driver and the maid is great. Sassy and sweet.
Always nice to see Sean Astin pop up in a movie. He and his counterpart in the pawn shop would make a hilarious duo in a longer series. Also the chemistry between the driver and the maid is great. Sassy and sweet.
Well written - fine acting. Inspiring for young women. Not raunchy - found myself wishing it were longer. The dressing, the cars everything made it feel like the 1960's. Bravo!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesJust before the end credits, a text appears on the screen informing the viewers that: "On February 8th, 1964, one word was introduced into the Civil Rights Bill, altering the course of history... sex."
- Erros de gravaçãoThe round bales of hay shown in the opening credits. Round bales were not around until the 70's.
- ConexõesFeatures The Secret Storm (1954)
- Trilhas sonorasThis Little Light of Mine
Performed by Shelley Short
Courtesy of Signature Music
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Charming the Hearts of Men?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Charming the Hearts of Men
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 47 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Uma Doce Revolução (2021) officially released in Canada in French?
Responda