O investigador particular de Los Angeles Harry Moseby é contratado por um cliente para encontrar sua filha adolescente fugitiva. Moseby rastreia a filha, apenas para tropeçar em algo muito m... Ler tudoO investigador particular de Los Angeles Harry Moseby é contratado por um cliente para encontrar sua filha adolescente fugitiva. Moseby rastreia a filha, apenas para tropeçar em algo muito mais intrigante e sinistro.O investigador particular de Los Angeles Harry Moseby é contratado por um cliente para encontrar sua filha adolescente fugitiva. Moseby rastreia a filha, apenas para tropeçar em algo muito mais intrigante e sinistro.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Indicado para 1 prêmio BAFTA
- 2 indicações no total
- Crewman
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
First of which, the story really doesn't make sense. It's clear when the case is more or less solved about an hour in that the movie is really going to be about something else. In this case, it's more about Hackman's character, a guy who despite his love of things like chess, can't seem to really figure stuff out. So we are taken through his marriage, his wife's infidelity. an attempted reconciliation, etc. All that stuff is great for a great actor like Hackman who makes you feel how lost he is.
The problem is that the ties that connect that to the real story, that of the art smuggling, which is the real mystery, are very thin. Also, the ties that connect the plot points of the smuggling story are very week. Too much coincidence, too many people happen to be exactly where they need to be. Too much crossing the country - - LA to Florida in the blink of an eye. One second Gene Hackman is chasing James Woods around LA on a motorcycle. The next scene, he finds him in Florida.
I read that the film was shot in 1973 and then shelved until 1975, meaning that there must have been issues with it then. There must have also been a lot scenes cut, because a lot is in there, it's just hidden very deeply with no way to get at it. I think this is a film to check out and enjoy for some very good elements. I just don't think we can put our blinders on and make it a 70s classic. Good film. Worth a watch.
The first half of this film is such a dull and plodding downbeat soap opera that it challenges the patience of the viewer. The relationships of a group of emotionally broken people hinting at personal guilt over sordid pasts thrown together by less than ideal circumstances don't always tie in with the actual narrative. But they aren't really meant to.
The real mystery of the story rests within the human interactions and what is important vs what is trivial. Harry is in fact a very poor detective. He lets those few emotional connections he is able to make with people cloud his judgments whilst assuming guilt on the part of those he doesn't like. What makes him a hero nevertheless is that he doesn't quit even if it means discovering personal betrayal.
Telling moments are rife. The way different people react differently from each other is a continual source of confusion for Harry. His inability to connect with his own wife on an emotional level has made her feel alone even in their most intimate moments together. Yet he lets his guard down with the wrong kinds of complete strangers. It certainly isn't by choice that he has chosen misread both the situation and the people surrounding it..
This is a more sophisticated form of detective story in that it offers an examination of the mindset of the detective - one who happens to be emotionally vulnerable and even a tad fragile.
With the recent death of Arthur Penn, I decide to see again "Night Moves", a movie that I watched in the 80's and was forgotten in my collection. "Night Moves" is a different and complex detective story, supported by an engaging and flawed screenplay and great characters development. The top-notch actor Gene Hackman in the top of his successful career performs a detective that snoops the lives of other people and is incapable to see that his marriage is deteriorating. The 18 year-old Melanie Griffith in her first credited role is extremely sexy and beautiful, undressing easily along the film. It is also interesting to see James Woods also in the beginning of career in a supporting role. It is also great to see again the gorgeous vanished actresses Jennifer Warren and Susan Clark. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Um Lance no Escuro" ("A Bid in the Dark")
Note: On 26 October 2014 I saw this movie again on DVD and now my vote is eight.
It is not hard to figure out why a young girl has run away from home when we see her mother, a washed up, alcoholic living in the Hollywood Hills. What is odd is trying to figure out the relationship between her, her stepfather and his girlfriend in the Florida Keys where she has gone to live. It is hinted that the stepfather is not just a stepfather.
Even stranger is Jennifer Warren's odd, abrupt, salty behavior in the film and the the strange dialog written for her. At one point, Gene Hackman even tells her he is tired of her "ping-pong talk". Was that written for the benefit of the audience or did he improvise? I felt puzzled by much of her performance.
It is also painful, really painful to watch Gene Hackman's wife struggle with their relationship and her learning new things about her husband.
Yes, a strange, strange little film. The acting is almost too revealing. I can't quite wrap my brain around the whole thing. I think it will be appreciated by fans of films from the 70's.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesDebut credited film role of Melanie Griffith and her first nude scenes. It's been reported that she was 17 when she appeared in this film, but if the film started filming in Oct. 1973 as reports state, that means Griffith turned 16 two months before, in August 1973.
- Erros de gravaçãoA considerable amount of time had passed between when Harry brought Delly home and when he had Paula return to the crash site to retrieve some of the treasure. It makes no sense that Tom and Paula wouldn't have already retrieved the treasure.
- Citações
Ellen Moseby: [of a football game] Who's winning?
Harry Moseby: Nobody. One side is just losing slower than the other.
- ConexõesFeatured in The Day of the Director (1975)
Principais escolhas
- How long is Night Moves?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Secreto oculto en el mar
- Locações de filme
- Sanibel Island, Flórida, EUA(Florida scenes.)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 40 minutos
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1