AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,0/10
4,9 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Harry e Jake, dois escritores malsucedidos, passam uma noite catártica discutindo sobre dinheiro, estética, sua amizade e o novo manuscrito de Harry.Harry e Jake, dois escritores malsucedidos, passam uma noite catártica discutindo sobre dinheiro, estética, sua amizade e o novo manuscrito de Harry.Harry e Jake, dois escritores malsucedidos, passam uma noite catártica discutindo sobre dinheiro, estética, sua amizade e o novo manuscrito de Harry.
Hazelle Goodman
- Cafe Dante waitress
- (as Hazel Goodman)
Avaliações em destaque
For his 2nd movie, Al gives us an unusual movie, maybe imperfect but original and totally personal.
We are far away of a big production and big issues as the movie is a nightly discussion between two friends that have real troubles to live with their art.
Honestly, I see no difference between this fiction character and the real Al that was unveiled in his first movie: Al is a simple guy that loves NYC and his passion is more for stage than acting.
Nowadays when stars are obsessed with their look, Al just doesn't care, even if his bent attitude and ugly clothes, he may look as a tramp. It's funny to see that getting older, he has gone from godfather, mayor, the devil to lefty, Shylock and this penniless beret writer! In a funny way, he's like an old Serpico who hadn't leave his basement accommodation!
However, inside, he's still the same great guy: supportive, helpful but sometimes a bit grumpy and always ready to scream! But, what the heck, we are humans so imperfect and it's better to be straight and noisy than devious and smiling!
Thus, even if the stage is minimal and narrow, we have access to all those nuances from Al and his buddy is great to share the ball. There are even funny moments and a good reflexion about artists' condition.
In a way, Al didn't look for big effects but true, simple moments. It may be a waste but finally, it's like you can share a evening with him, talking about life and nothing, and thus it's infinitely valuable.
We are far away of a big production and big issues as the movie is a nightly discussion between two friends that have real troubles to live with their art.
Honestly, I see no difference between this fiction character and the real Al that was unveiled in his first movie: Al is a simple guy that loves NYC and his passion is more for stage than acting.
Nowadays when stars are obsessed with their look, Al just doesn't care, even if his bent attitude and ugly clothes, he may look as a tramp. It's funny to see that getting older, he has gone from godfather, mayor, the devil to lefty, Shylock and this penniless beret writer! In a funny way, he's like an old Serpico who hadn't leave his basement accommodation!
However, inside, he's still the same great guy: supportive, helpful but sometimes a bit grumpy and always ready to scream! But, what the heck, we are humans so imperfect and it's better to be straight and noisy than devious and smiling!
Thus, even if the stage is minimal and narrow, we have access to all those nuances from Al and his buddy is great to share the ball. There are even funny moments and a good reflexion about artists' condition.
In a way, Al didn't look for big effects but true, simple moments. It may be a waste but finally, it's like you can share a evening with him, talking about life and nothing, and thus it's infinitely valuable.
10tfmiltz
This movie will require many revisits to fully appreciate it.
Tempted to call it 'My room' or heh - 'My room with a view'.
No spoilers here - not that this movie has any.
Do not miss this experience.
Forget waiting for Godot - I think he shows up in this one.
Just a masterpiece.
I really don't have any words beyond that, short of Thank you Al Pacino for working on this and bringing it to light.
All I can say is - watch this, maybe watch it over some period of time - in pieces.
Tempted to call it 'My room' or heh - 'My room with a view'.
No spoilers here - not that this movie has any.
Do not miss this experience.
Forget waiting for Godot - I think he shows up in this one.
Just a masterpiece.
I really don't have any words beyond that, short of Thank you Al Pacino for working on this and bringing it to light.
All I can say is - watch this, maybe watch it over some period of time - in pieces.
Harry Levine (Al Pacino) and Jake Manheim (Jerry Orbach), two unsuccessful writers, spend a cathartic evening arguing about money, aesthetics, their friendship, and Harry's new manuscript.
This film, based on a Broadway play (which had starred Pacino) is well-adapted by director Al Pacino (it helps that there was minimal stuff to direct). The origin as a play is fairly obvious, given how much is talk and how little is action (and I wonder if they had to add or modify scenes to create additional movement and scenery).
While not one of the greatest films ever, and not even one of Pacino's best, it has its moments and it is a great interaction between two people. If you like a lot of dialogue and bickering (think "Clerks" without all the dirty talk) and miss Jerry Orbach, this is the film for you.
This film, based on a Broadway play (which had starred Pacino) is well-adapted by director Al Pacino (it helps that there was minimal stuff to direct). The origin as a play is fairly obvious, given how much is talk and how little is action (and I wonder if they had to add or modify scenes to create additional movement and scenery).
While not one of the greatest films ever, and not even one of Pacino's best, it has its moments and it is a great interaction between two people. If you like a lot of dialogue and bickering (think "Clerks" without all the dirty talk) and miss Jerry Orbach, this is the film for you.
A Broadway play turned into a film starring Al Pacino and Jerry Orbach. Think of this script as sort of a "Who's Afraid of Virginia Wolf" between two heterosexual men. In the span of two hours (with flashbacks) layer after layer of their relatively short friendship is peeled away to raw feelings and pseudo-honest expressions until a few truths may have been reached. My only problem with it is in the style of the dialog much of the time feeling the scripts are invisible but right in front of them. The timing is too "ready" and snappy, the comebacks polished, the exchanges sculpted with care. Had it (they) been relaxed, awkward, slow to respond, overly fast to respond, etc., I could've believed it. As it is, I never lost awareness this was a staged play.
Well I just loved the Chinese Coffee for its brilliant acting and direction. It reminded me of the theater of the Absurd in a strange haunting way! With Chinese Coffee Mr. Pacino surpasses his own status of being a stellar performer & a superstar combined and cements his position as one of the greatest artists of all times.
The tone of the movie is intimate and artistic at times a little dark. I loved the stream of Levine's consciousness which makes the audiences look into his past---his hopes & failures. Pacino is brilliant as a middle aged struggling writer who is haunted by his own past, his parents' and his own shortcomings and aspirations.
Kudos to Mr. Pacino for providing us with such a brilliant artistic piece! He truly is a gem of an artist. Love him! God bless!
The tone of the movie is intimate and artistic at times a little dark. I loved the stream of Levine's consciousness which makes the audiences look into his past---his hopes & failures. Pacino is brilliant as a middle aged struggling writer who is haunted by his own past, his parents' and his own shortcomings and aspirations.
Kudos to Mr. Pacino for providing us with such a brilliant artistic piece! He truly is a gem of an artist. Love him! God bless!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesAl Pacino starred in the 1992 Broadway stage production of "Chinese Coffee".
- Erros de gravaçãoNear the end of the film Harry is poured a full glass of seltzer with a lime in it by Barney. Although he does not touch it, the glass is empty when he gets up to leave.
- Citações
Jake Manheim: I'm exhausted from being exhausted.
- ConexõesReferenced in Biografias: Al Pacino: Inside Out (2001)
- Trilhas sonorasPalm Court
Written by Aaron Briggs (as Briggs), Alan Briggs (as Briggs) and Paul Williams (as Williams)
Courtesy of Opus 1 Production Music and Amphonic Music Limited (ASCAP)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Chinese Coffee?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 39 min(99 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente