Calendário de lançamento250 filmes mais popularesFilmes mais popularesPesquisar filmes por gêneroMais populares no cinemaHorários de exibição e ingressosNotícias de cinemaFilmes indianos em destaque
    O que está na TV e no streaming250 séries mais popularesSéries mais popularesPesquisar séries por gêneroNotícias da TV
    O que assistirTrailers mais recentesOriginais do IMDbEscolhas do IMDbDestaque da IMDbFamily Entertainment GuidePodcasts da IMDb
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuidePrêmios STARMeterCentral de prêmiosCentral de festivaisTodos os eventos
    Nascido hojeCelebridades mais popularesNotícias de celebridades
    Central de ajudaZona do colaboradorSondagens
Para profissionais do setor
  • Idioma
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista de favoritos
Fazer login
  • Totalmente suportado
  • English (United States)
    Parcialmente suportado
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usar o app
  • Elenco e equipe
  • Avaliações de usuários
IMDbPro

Fields of Gold

  • Filme para televisão
  • 2002
  • 3 h
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,7/10
181
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Fields of Gold (2002)
Drama

Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA two-part conspiracy thriller about an eager young photographer and a bitter tabloid hacker who are sent to investigate mysterious deaths at a cottage hospital.A two-part conspiracy thriller about an eager young photographer and a bitter tabloid hacker who are sent to investigate mysterious deaths at a cottage hospital.A two-part conspiracy thriller about an eager young photographer and a bitter tabloid hacker who are sent to investigate mysterious deaths at a cottage hospital.

  • Direção
    • Bill Anderson
  • Roteiristas
    • Ronan Bennett
    • Alan Rusbridger
  • Artistas
    • Anna Friel
    • Phil Davis
    • Max Beesley
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
    6,7/10
    181
    SUA AVALIAÇÃO
    • Direção
      • Bill Anderson
    • Roteiristas
      • Ronan Bennett
      • Alan Rusbridger
    • Artistas
      • Anna Friel
      • Phil Davis
      • Max Beesley
    • 8Avaliações de usuários
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro
  • Fotos

    Elenco principal49

    Editar
    Anna Friel
    Anna Friel
    • Lucia Merritt
    Phil Davis
    Phil Davis
    • Roy Lodge
    Max Beesley
    Max Beesley
    • Mark Hurst
    James Fleet
    James Fleet
    • Alan Buckley
    Mark Strong
    Mark Strong
    • Dr. Tolkin
    Thomas Wheatley
    • Francis Chibnall
    Paul Freeman
    Paul Freeman
    • Sir James Ferneyhough
    Tony Haygarth
    Tony Haygarth
    • George Hurst
    William Hope
    William Hope
    • Nick Venner
    Alphonsia Emmanuel
    • Karen Delage
    Bradley Lavelle
    Bradley Lavelle
    • Richard Elliott
    David Schofield
    David Schofield
    • Craig
    Benedict Cumberbatch
    Benedict Cumberbatch
    • Jeremy
    Ian Peck
    Ian Peck
    • Harden
    Phyllis Logan
    Phyllis Logan
    • Rachel Greenlaw
    Michael Feast
    Michael Feast
    • Wilf
    Guy Henry
    Guy Henry
    • Andrew MacIntosh
    Gary McDonald
    Gary McDonald
    • Johnson
    • Direção
      • Bill Anderson
    • Roteiristas
      • Ronan Bennett
      • Alan Rusbridger
    • Elenco e equipe completos
    • Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro

    Avaliações de usuários8

    6,7181
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Avaliações em destaque

    8franheck

    Ahead of its time in 2002/On spot 2018

    This is a very chilling moving and definitely worth seeing. Well ahead of it's time, it gives insight into what Big Pharma, Big Business and governments can and will do to protect profits over lives. If anyone thinks this isn't happening in today's world of chemicals, genetically modified organisms, they are delusional. When the movie was produced in 2002, it was considered science fiction. In 2018 it's now science and the concept is no longer fiction.
    8lm_work

    I believe the movie's premise is true

    Phil Davis and Anna Friel are terrific in this story, which I wish was sci-fi but sadly I believe that it's prescient. The themes are skillfully taken apart until it's clear what the real enemy is, and whose greed is responsible for the disaster. I enjoyed this film; it wasn't perfect but its message should be taken to heart before it's too late.
    6khatcher-2

    Up-to-date and thought-provoking

    I cannot help thinking that the BBC made a mistake in the dates on which this film for television was first broadcast. Saturday and Sunday 8th/9th June, 2002 must have been somewhat inappropriate, judging from the negligible feedback available.

    Co-written by Ronan Bennett and Alan Rusbridger, science correspondent of the Guardian newspaper, `Fields of Golds' sets out on the not at all science-fiction story of things going wrong in genetically manipulated crops experiments. Also the film includes the illegal use of an antibiotic drug in a hospital, with the result of a few people dying. Far fetched? Not at all: here in Spain in the last few months we have had two such similar cases of unlicensed drugs being used and even being sold in pharmacies.

    This film, then, raises some very dark questions: how far are the big multinational pharmaceutical groups prepared to go in the pursuit of money? Are they out of responsible government control? Is transgenic food really the answer? Personally I have very strong doubts on this last question, but no doubts on the first two. There is a lot of shouting in favour of and against the breeding of transgenic crops. Anna Friel as Lucia Merritt the photographer for the newspaper, and Philip Davis as Roy Lodge the reporter, put in good performances and help hold the whole lot together. Anna Friel does not just look nice but also acts rather well, and Philip Davis as the rather slovenly, ill-mannered and drunk working- companion offers some really good moments, though I rather fancy the last scenes were a bit overdone. The climax did not seem to follow the basic line adopted throughout the film. The message was clearly stated, evidently.

    Patients in a hospital develop VRSA - Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - caused by a pharmaceutical company experimenting with transgenic crops, and which is supposedly highly contagious in the air or even from contact by clothes. In fact, Staphylococcus aureus is a hospital- and community-acquired infection, derived from vancomycin-resistant enterococci recognised in 1988, and is not contagious in the air as purported in this film (John Hopkins Memorial Hospital). The Pennsylvania Department of Health also has published a very recent paper on this matter [Oct.11th 2002 /51(40);902].

    Thus I was unable to make the connection with references in the film to Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) or Aphteuse Fevers, as this is confined to animals and is a virus of the order Mononegavirales family Picornaviridae, genus Aphthovirus, which could not be caused as depicted in the film. Also, such references to FMD in Britain might be called an ill-judged moment. Half the farmers in England have either gone out of business or are still struggling to make up economic losses as a direct consequence of the recent outbreak. There were a few other loose ends which had me guessing a bit.

    However, technicalities apart, the film was obviously intended to raise serious questions on how science can get out of hand, especially in the field of genetic engineering which is gathering momentum by the day and outstripping paquidermic legalities, and so deserves recommendation at the very least. Better still would be that the BBC make a bit more noise on these issues and repeat the showing of the film at a better moment - for example in the middle of the Christmas holidays. Hopefully a few US TV channels will show it: it might well put somebody off their transgenic turkeys and genetic groceries ....
    Magnesi

    Left a nasty taste in the mouth (and that's NOT the GM food)

    'Fields of Gold': Science fiction. For many commentators the science used here was nonsensical. According to the Independent newspaper, the Science Media Centre's director, Fiona Fox, was not impressed by this movie. "It's a fairly safe bet that if the authors of Fields of Gold, the drama about GM crops screened on BBC 1, are asked to produce a sequel to their "conspiracy thriller", they will write in a new role for a sinister, biotech-funded media centre. The real-life Science Media Centre (SMC) found itself cast in its own conspiracy by the drama's authors - Alan Rusbridger, editor of The Guardian, and his co-author and Guardian colleague Ronan Bennett - after a row about the plausibility of the science in the anti-GM storyline. In a series of newspaper articles and television interviews, the writers described the new SMC as a "lobby group" for big biotech companies, and accused the centre of orchestrating an ugly, secret campaign to discredit the programme and "dump on" The Guardian and the BBC. The truth about the SMC and its role in this story is less sinister" (quoting from the Independent newspaper). Rumour has it that Rushbridger later blocked Fox's sister Claire from writing a column in the Society (social services) section of his newspaper the Guardian. Subsequently Guardian gossip columnists ran a series of attacks and innuendos about Fiona Fox. Touchy...
    9Sleepin_Dragon

    Bang on the money.

    A talented enthusiastic young journalist, and an unhealthy, grumpy journalist begin looking at deaths at a small Cottage Hospital.

    This gave me a scare back in 2002, and I was fortunate enough to recently get hold of a copy of it, it has the same kind of vibe and effect of a show like Threads.

    Was it preachy, or were they absolutely bang on the money? I think the latter.

    In 2021 we have had Covid 19, we have mass obesity, and we have an alarming rise in the numbers of diabetes cases. The cause, surely has to be dietary, who knows what kind of junk is in our food, needless to say we all carry on regardless.

    I'm one of those people that have had to give up wheat in any form, I instantly bloat and feel ill, I'm not sure wheat now has any resemblance to what it did 200 years ago.

    It tells you one real life thing, these pharmaceutical companies are massive, and have a huge control over our lives.

    Enough of my preaching, it's a very long drama, but it does hit hard, it's impactful, it's thought provoking, and very well produced and acted, Phil Davis and Anna Friel are both great.

    Excellent, brave drama, 9/10.

    Mais itens semelhantes

    Chasing Shadows
    7,4
    Chasing Shadows
    10 Days to War
    7,1
    10 Days to War
    The Hamburg Cell
    6,9
    The Hamburg Cell
    Um Golpe de Sorte
    6,2
    Um Golpe de Sorte
    Morte ao Rei
    6,2
    Morte ao Rei
    Girlfriend in a Coma
    7,2
    Girlfriend in a Coma
    Rebel Heart
    7,5
    Rebel Heart
    A História de Stephen Hawking
    7,4
    A História de Stephen Hawking
    Hidden
    6,7
    Hidden
    A Man You Don't Meet Every Day
    7,3
    A Man You Don't Meet Every Day
    Dunkirk
    7,2
    Dunkirk
    The Psychopath Next Door
    6,5
    The Psychopath Next Door

    Enredo

    Editar

    Principais escolhas

    Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
    Fazer login

    Detalhes

    Editar
    • Data de lançamento
      • 8 de junho de 2002 (Reino Unido)
    • País de origem
      • Reino Unido
    • Central de atendimento oficial
      • BBC (United Kingdom)
    • Idioma
      • Inglês
    • Também conhecido como
      • Aranymezők
    • Empresa de produção
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro

    Bilheteria

    Editar
    • Orçamento
      • £ 2.300.000 (estimativa)
    Veja informações detalhadas da bilheteria no IMDbPro

    Especificações técnicas

    Editar
    • Tempo de duração
      3 horas
    • Cor
      • Color
    • Mixagem de som
      • Stereo
    • Proporção
      • 16:9 HD

    Contribua para esta página

    Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
    • Respostas da IMDb: ajude a preencher brechas em nossos dados
    • Saiba mais sobre como contribuir
    Editar página

    Explore mais

    Vistos recentemente

    Ative os cookies do navegador para usar este recurso. Saiba mais.
    Obtenha o app IMDb
    Faça login para obter mais acessoFaça login para obter mais acesso
    Siga o IMDb nas redes sociais
    Obtenha o app IMDb
    Para Android e iOS
    Obtenha o app IMDb
    • Ajuda
    • Índice do site
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Dados da licença de IMDb
    • Sala de imprensa
    • Anúncios
    • Tarefas
    • Condições de uso
    • Política de privacidade
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.