Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA screenwriter is plagued by nightmares as he writes a script about a family that was slaughtered years before. Soon, the grisly murders he's writing about actually start to happen.A screenwriter is plagued by nightmares as he writes a script about a family that was slaughtered years before. Soon, the grisly murders he's writing about actually start to happen.A screenwriter is plagued by nightmares as he writes a script about a family that was slaughtered years before. Soon, the grisly murders he's writing about actually start to happen.
Kristin Lorenz
- Nina
- (as Kristen Lorenz)
Ronald Rezac
- Mr. Marsh
- (as Ron Rezac)
Avaliações em destaque
A screenwriter (Adam Baldwin) is plagued by nightmares as he writes a script about a family that was slaughtered years before. Soon, the grisly murders he writes about start to actually happen.
I was attracted to this film by Udo Kier, a great actor, here being the creepy German guy he does so well. Unfortunately, Kier's presence is just about the only good thing I can say about the movie (and even then, his role is rather limited -- though more than a cameo).
Surprisingly, or maybe not, the movie is rather boring. Baldwin does not hold my attention well, I have no concern for his character. The death scenes, which offer plenty of potential for creativity, just never impress. A shot of a drill is okay, and a quick shot of a man who looks burned is alright... but it is all too tame.
The theme of fiction and reality crossing over is done alright, but if I wanted to see something like that done well, I would watch "In the Mouth of Madness". There is also a satanic undertone, but perhaps far too subtle to even be considered a subplot...
I was attracted to this film by Udo Kier, a great actor, here being the creepy German guy he does so well. Unfortunately, Kier's presence is just about the only good thing I can say about the movie (and even then, his role is rather limited -- though more than a cameo).
Surprisingly, or maybe not, the movie is rather boring. Baldwin does not hold my attention well, I have no concern for his character. The death scenes, which offer plenty of potential for creativity, just never impress. A shot of a drill is okay, and a quick shot of a man who looks burned is alright... but it is all too tame.
The theme of fiction and reality crossing over is done alright, but if I wanted to see something like that done well, I would watch "In the Mouth of Madness". There is also a satanic undertone, but perhaps far too subtle to even be considered a subplot...
The first time I watched this film on Sci-Fi channel, I lost interest halfway through because I thought it was gratuitously graphic and violent. But, upon a second late-night viewing, I realized that the plot is a real mind-bender. I didn't have enough patience the first time I watched it. Also, the second time, I noticed how hot the main actress is. She looks plain, but she is really sexy. The primary actors do a great job, but some of the peripheral roles are filled by amateurs who really make the film look cheap and self-aware. Compared to some other low-budget movies though, Evil Eyes has well-written, believable dialog.
The successful screenplay writer Jeff Stenn (Adam Baldwin) is in disgrace with the big studios and needs money to pay his mortgage. He is happily married to his wife Tree (Jennifer Gates) and they are trying to have a baby, but he is afraid that his financial situation affects his marriage. Out of the blue, the weird producer George (Udo Kier) offers the true story of a real homicide that happened thirty-five years ago to Jeff to write the screenplay. He accepts the offer and learns that the killer killed his pregnant wife and in-laws and committed suicide after. While writing the screenplay, Jeff sees many friends and acquaintances dying and questions whether his writing is causing the deaths.
"Evil Eyes" is an ironic horror film since it is based on the storyline of a screenplay writer, but the movie itself has a messy screenplay. The premise and the beginning are promising, but the characters development is poor and the plot absolutely confused. In the end, it is a boring horror movie that makes the viewer sleep. My vote is three.
Title (Brazil): "Olhos Malditos" ("Evil Eyes")
"Evil Eyes" is an ironic horror film since it is based on the storyline of a screenplay writer, but the movie itself has a messy screenplay. The premise and the beginning are promising, but the characters development is poor and the plot absolutely confused. In the end, it is a boring horror movie that makes the viewer sleep. My vote is three.
Title (Brazil): "Olhos Malditos" ("Evil Eyes")
One of the worst movies ever made, totally awful from start to finish. I felt sorry for the two actors whose names are on the box art because they have been in much better movies and this thing must be an embarrassment to them and their filmographies. Everything about this waste of time is poorly done from the script, the direction, the silly "special" effects, the atrocious acting from the wife, to the ugly videography, and dopey unclimactic story. I watched this for free on Tubi and the whole movie was out of synch adding to the disgust. I was fascinated enough to finish it to see just how bad it is. If I could have given it a negative rating, I would have. If you value your time and eyesight, stear clear of this garbage.
Continuing on my curiosity rampage to see if The Asylum were capable of a tolerable enough movie I saw Evil Eyes. It is a bad movie, but not enough to be among The Asylum's worst. The opening scene does have some atmosphere and a sense of dread, Udo Kier is a creepy presence and Adam Baldwin has some likability. That's all I can give for redeeming qualities though. It is very haphazard technically, with camera work and editing that will make you dizzy, lighting that feels dark just for the sake of it rather than enhancing the atmosphere and effects that look as if the technicians were concerned more about quantity rather than quality. Apart from Baldwin and Kier(the latter actually deserved more screen time because if I had to single out the best thing of Evil Eyes he would be it), the acting is amateurish and can't do anything to lift their cardboard characters and stilted dialogue. The story is also a major problem, the opening sequence is the only scene that works in terms of atmosphere and suspense, everything else is padded out predictability to the point of sheer boredom. The gore and killings have nothing that stands out as original, and there is the feel that Evil Eyes wasn't even trying to make sense. All in all, has a couple of redeeming values, other than that Evil Eyes is a mess. 3/10 Bethany Cox
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoWhile Ed is examining a piece of cloth with a magnifier, he flips the magnifier over from shot to shot (apparently to create a magnified eyeball in the initial shot). Because the magnifier's case is open on one side, the flipping is quite obvious.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditos"No animals were hurt during the production of this screenplay. Even the undead ones."
- ConexõesReferenced in Evil Eyes: Behind the Scenes (2004)
- Trilhas sonorasAve Maria
Composed by Franz Schubert
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 1.000.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 20 minutos
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Olhos Malditos (2004) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda