AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,9/10
15 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Reunindo o mesmo elenco carismático da comédia dramática, Porque É que Me Casei?, Tyler Perry mostra o próximo capítulo da vida de oito amigos da faculdade que lutam contra os desafios da vi... Ler tudoReunindo o mesmo elenco carismático da comédia dramática, Porque É que Me Casei?, Tyler Perry mostra o próximo capítulo da vida de oito amigos da faculdade que lutam contra os desafios da vida conjugal em Por Que Eu Me Casei Também?Reunindo o mesmo elenco carismático da comédia dramática, Porque É que Me Casei?, Tyler Perry mostra o próximo capítulo da vida de oito amigos da faculdade que lutam contra os desafios da vida conjugal em Por Que Eu Me Casei Também?
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 4 indicações no total
Kaira Akita
- Keisha
- (as Kaira Whitehead)
Avaliações em destaque
Last night I went to the threatre not knowing what I was going to see. Literally. I had no notion of what films were playing. I wanted to see "The Lost Legion" because I was in the mood for a swords and sandal epic, but it wasn't playing anywhere nearby. Would I not be able to see Roman legions clashing with native armies in Briton? Answer; no. So, I looked up at the list of films, saw "Why did I Get Married", and made a blind ticket purchase for a film I had never heard of, nor had any notion of what it was about.
I've never seen the stage-play upon which this film is based, but, having seen many a stage play adaptation to the big screen, and having been thoroughly disappointed with every one of them, I can say that this one did a fairly good job.
The revolves around several couples whose marriages are teetering in varying degrees of distress. Secrets that have been held tight by husband and wife are eventually thrust into the open, testing the couples' fortitude.
Visually the film is warm and intimate, and keeps a good amount of zest by way of fine emoting. There are some ever so brief lulls, but the story content and delivery by the actors keeps the viewer's attention.
The one "antagonist" in the film (if he can be called that) was almost a little too obvious. The boorish husband character was barely disguised as to his true intentions. So much so that I was wondering if the character wasn't supposed to be putting on some kind of act. But alas, that wasn't the case. It was a shortcoming of the creative team.
Most of the film is light, but there is one segment that came out of left field to break up wit bound dialog. The more dramatic scenes were respectable, but weren't always given the same amount of care to the lighter scenes.
My one real complaint about the story is that I felt somewhat lost as to who was suffering from what history. There's a lot implied, and the more relationship-savvy viewer can probably puzzle out the nuances and idiosyncrasies of marital secrets and scandal. But I have to admit that I just didn't get a lot of the situations until they were spelled out for me. Ah well :-) Some light entertainment that delivers an abridged version of a play with fairly good aplomb. It is a film marketed for an African American audience, but marital situations are universal to all, and as such this film can be enjoyed by all audiences (though your theatre's audience may vary). Definitely a good rent when it comes out on DVD.
I've never seen the stage-play upon which this film is based, but, having seen many a stage play adaptation to the big screen, and having been thoroughly disappointed with every one of them, I can say that this one did a fairly good job.
The revolves around several couples whose marriages are teetering in varying degrees of distress. Secrets that have been held tight by husband and wife are eventually thrust into the open, testing the couples' fortitude.
Visually the film is warm and intimate, and keeps a good amount of zest by way of fine emoting. There are some ever so brief lulls, but the story content and delivery by the actors keeps the viewer's attention.
The one "antagonist" in the film (if he can be called that) was almost a little too obvious. The boorish husband character was barely disguised as to his true intentions. So much so that I was wondering if the character wasn't supposed to be putting on some kind of act. But alas, that wasn't the case. It was a shortcoming of the creative team.
Most of the film is light, but there is one segment that came out of left field to break up wit bound dialog. The more dramatic scenes were respectable, but weren't always given the same amount of care to the lighter scenes.
My one real complaint about the story is that I felt somewhat lost as to who was suffering from what history. There's a lot implied, and the more relationship-savvy viewer can probably puzzle out the nuances and idiosyncrasies of marital secrets and scandal. But I have to admit that I just didn't get a lot of the situations until they were spelled out for me. Ah well :-) Some light entertainment that delivers an abridged version of a play with fairly good aplomb. It is a film marketed for an African American audience, but marital situations are universal to all, and as such this film can be enjoyed by all audiences (though your theatre's audience may vary). Definitely a good rent when it comes out on DVD.
The film touches on some heavy points, but never really digs very deep. It's light weight, but that's fine.
The acting on the whole is good.......... Janet Jackson is a tad weak..... she was not that convincing.
I did like Jill Scott though.
I did like when the guys were just chatting, it felt really real and made me smile.
It's not ground breaking, it won't change your life, but it's fun in parts and some parts made me laugh out loud.
I think this a solid 5/10.
The acting on the whole is good.......... Janet Jackson is a tad weak..... she was not that convincing.
I did like Jill Scott though.
I did like when the guys were just chatting, it felt really real and made me smile.
It's not ground breaking, it won't change your life, but it's fun in parts and some parts made me laugh out loud.
I think this a solid 5/10.
Before seeing this film or any other Tyler Perry production I, like many of you, had my doubts. But there is something quite engaging when watching this film. The thing I ask you to remember when watching this film is seeing what was produced with the resources at hand. Of course there are flaws and the emotions seem slightly pushed at times, but it was a good story full of love, understanding, fun, and laughter. Tasha Smith did an excellent in her role as did Tyler, Sharon Leal, and Jill Scott. You fall in love with these guys, all of them, and whats going on in there lives very quickly. I will admit that the cast of characters would be better suited for a television sitcom. But, with the amount of main characters in this film, i still say a job well done. I am most eager to see how their stories develop in the next movie and i also think that it would also be a wonderful idea to consider a television show going back to when they all first met and started dating and for it to be on a network like HBO or showtime, but that might be dreaming too high. Anyway, this was a successful film am I am excited to see the next film and some of the films Perry has put out that I've missed. Just check it out with an open mind.
Like other reviewers of this movie, I can't believe the low ratings that some people gave it. I rented this movie as a lark. Other than hearing his name, I was not really familiar with Tyler Perry nor had seen any of his other productions. My Hubby (of 30+ years) is out-of-town, and because we have only sons, I get out-voted a lot and thus don't get to see many "chick flicks." I discovered that this film is neither a "chick flick" nor a "black flick." It is a comedy-drama HUMAN interest film about four married couples who vacation together once a year to reaffirm their marriages. The situations that these couples face are those that anyone who's been married any length of time might relate to. I loved it! It made me laugh and cry and think. What more can you ask of a film?! It was beautifully filmed and the acting was top-notch. Sure there were a few weak spots here and there, but all-in-all, well-crafted.
First of all I must say that I don't understand the low ranking, it is truly an underestimation of this film. I must admit that while I am a Tyler Perry fan I have been underwhelmed by his previous box office offerings. This film for me was a welcomed departure from his other films, it just seemed more professional, well directed, and the casting was phenomenal. Evan though it was rather preachy it seemed much less "after-school-specialish" than his initial movies. Jill Scott was amazing, Tasha Smith was Hilarious, and Janet Jackson wasn't as boring as she usually is. I hope this film is a precursor of more to come from Tyler Perry.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesJanet Jackson was originally sought for a role in Madea - Reunião de Família (2006), but was unavailable. Tyler Perry was very keen to work with her so asked her to be in this film.
- Erros de gravaçãoDiane wouldn't be a defense attorney in a criminal/murder case if she were a top litigator at her law firm.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosSpecial Thanks to: Bishop T.D. Jakes (for the "80/20 Rule")
- Trilhas sonorasColor Me Blue
Written by Jay Weigel
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Why Did I Get Married??Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Why Did I Get Married?
- Locações de filme
- Pemberton, Columbia Britânica, Canadá(Village of Pemberton)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 15.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 55.204.525
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 21.353.789
- 14 de out. de 2007
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 55.862.886
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 53 min(113 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente