Um piloto é responsável por transportar uma profissional da Força Aérea que acompanha um fugitivo até seu julgamento. À medida que atravessam o Alasca, a tensão aumenta e a confiança é testa... Ler tudoUm piloto é responsável por transportar uma profissional da Força Aérea que acompanha um fugitivo até seu julgamento. À medida que atravessam o Alasca, a tensão aumenta e a confiança é testada já que nem todos a bordo são quem mostram ser.Um piloto é responsável por transportar uma profissional da Força Aérea que acompanha um fugitivo até seu julgamento. À medida que atravessam o Alasca, a tensão aumenta e a confiança é testada já que nem todos a bordo são quem mostram ser.
Eilise Patton
- Janine
- (as Eilise Guilfoyle)
Mark Schotz
- Rescue Worker #2
- (as Mark 'Cowboy' Schotz)
Georgi S. Georgiev
- Jeff (State Trooper #2)
- (não creditado)
Atanas Srebrev
- State Trooper #1
- (não creditado)
5,239.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Flight Risk' offers mixed reactions, highlighting strong performances by Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Dockery, and Topher Grace. The confined plane setting is intriguing yet criticized for predictability and lack of depth. Common complaints include weak dialogue, unrealistic plot points, and clichés. Some appreciate the humor and tension, while others find it fails as a thriller. Mel Gibson's direction receives mixed reviews, seen as a decline from his earlier works. Overall, 'Flight Risk' is entertaining but flawed, not fully leveraging its potential.
Avaliações em destaque
Everyone is Critic and Most are Dumb
This is a fine movie. People are rating it like it's some Oscar nomination high concept film and the thriller it claims to be.
Comparing is to old movies that is stupid. Today's viewer doesn't care about your nostalgia and how it compares.
There is nothing technically wrong with this movie on its own. Sure it's stretches reality, but that's what movies do and have done since the very first.
I've watch a lot of movies, a lot. I know what a sub five star movie is, this isn't. Get a grip people.
The storyline is easy to follow, it doesn't have random plot holes. It's actually very formulaic which isn't a bad thing and anyone who claims different likely watches season 8 of an endless cop drama / hospital drama / hero drama nonsense without the same critique.
Comparing is to old movies that is stupid. Today's viewer doesn't care about your nostalgia and how it compares.
There is nothing technically wrong with this movie on its own. Sure it's stretches reality, but that's what movies do and have done since the very first.
I've watch a lot of movies, a lot. I know what a sub five star movie is, this isn't. Get a grip people.
The storyline is easy to follow, it doesn't have random plot holes. It's actually very formulaic which isn't a bad thing and anyone who claims different likely watches season 8 of an endless cop drama / hospital drama / hero drama nonsense without the same critique.
Better than The Wolfman and Nosferatu
It's not a high concept movie by any stretch. But, it is an entertaining flick. And, it's the first time Wahlberg has played an actual bad guy since 1996's Fear. And not to give anything away, but damn, his character gets taken to task to say the least.
Topher Grace is...Topher Grace in this movie. His character really could've been played by any number of actors. The same could be said for the actress who played the FBI agent. But in reality, none of the characters actually required in depth character study or to be standout. It was just a matter of getting actors to sign onto the film who could competently pull off the scenes.
So again, it's a decent film overall. I don't think anyone will walk out feeling disappointed or angry about spending their time or money watching it. And as run of the mill as it is, it's still better than what's being nominated for an Academy award this year.
Topher Grace is...Topher Grace in this movie. His character really could've been played by any number of actors. The same could be said for the actress who played the FBI agent. But in reality, none of the characters actually required in depth character study or to be standout. It was just a matter of getting actors to sign onto the film who could competently pull off the scenes.
So again, it's a decent film overall. I don't think anyone will walk out feeling disappointed or angry about spending their time or money watching it. And as run of the mill as it is, it's still better than what's being nominated for an Academy award this year.
Is this a joke?
I'm not sure if this actually a joke? Didn't Michelle Dockery or Mark Walhberg question the stuff they were saying? Didn't Mel Gibson question the editing? Is this some sort of tax right off for all those involved? If Mel Gibson has only directed 5 films, why on earth would he want this to be one of them? I'm just so surprised. The plot has so many holes you could strain spaghetti with it. The acting is awful, even by good actors. There are so many cliches it's unreal. Actually, come to think of it, I'm wondering if this is the first movie ever made that was written by ChatGpT? Maybe edited by it too?
You can do a lot worse, but you can certainly do better.
Flight Risk is the very definition of the term "Straight to DVD movie" from which I know it is a redundant statement in the modern era, but you get the point. The film is a low-budget thriller with a decent premise to kill an evening, and with Mel Gibson directing at the helm, I thought it might be worth checking out. Unfortunately, the film doesn't pay off as anything remarkable. Mark Wahlberg is introduced as a wise-cracking, charismatic pilot who holds the screen well initially, but the character fails to blossom throughout the film to anything interesting. My main confusion is the tone, the movie consistently juggles between a sort of intense thriller and an intentional comedy. However, I didn't find the jokes or light humor funny and considering the situation they are all placed in, it just perplexed me. I feel that if the film focused on being a straight up thriller, it could have been a pretty decent little flick. Not to mention a final shot that I found a rather bizarre choice to end on. Overall, Flight Risk contains strong performances, and is nicely directed, but narratively speaking it could have been a lot better.
10/10 really?
How can you rate this movie a 10/10? It's not even close to being Saving Private Ryan, Schindlers List, A Beautiful Life, Shawnshank Redemption, Gladiator, etc. Those movies aren't even rated 10/10. The acting and storyline was mediocre at best. After seeing this in theatres I thought it was a waste of money and should've just been released to Netflix directly. Don't get me wrong I'm a fan of Mel Gibson, Topher Grace, and Mark Wahlberg. Felt like it was a low budget movie. There were areas that were entertaining. However, I felt like this movie was lacking depth. Do yourself a favor and wait to watch this movie whenever it comes out on your favorite streaming service.
Trilha sonora
Ouça aqui um trecho da trilha sonora e continue ouvindo na Amazon Music.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesMark Wahlberg really shaved his head for his role in this movie. He did not want to use a bald cap.
- Erros de gravaçãoMadolyn and Winston, while arguing with Daryl, are suddenly alerted to the presence of mountain tops, then, while trying to pull up, smash through a snow bank between two peaks. There is absolutely no way that plane would have survived that impact without a scratch.
- ConexõesReferenced in The Joe Rogan Experience: Mel Gibson (2025)
- Trilhas sonorasWho Was That
Performed by Bobby Rush & Kenny Wayne Shepherd
Written by Bobby Rush & Kenny Wayne Shepherd
Courtesy of KWS Music Inc. and Rushup Productions Inc.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Flight Risk?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 25.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 29.783.527
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 11.583.488
- 26 de jan. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 48.701.987
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 31 min(91 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente






