AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,2/10
730
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn architect is diagnosed with a rare eye disease, entering him into a surreal reality in which he sees people's true motives. As the visions become intolerable, he falls for a strange woman... Ler tudoAn architect is diagnosed with a rare eye disease, entering him into a surreal reality in which he sees people's true motives. As the visions become intolerable, he falls for a strange woman and confronts the truth about his own identity.An architect is diagnosed with a rare eye disease, entering him into a surreal reality in which he sees people's true motives. As the visions become intolerable, he falls for a strange woman and confronts the truth about his own identity.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 2 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
Probably for the wrong reasons...like the comment made by the supposed sound engineer of this movie in this comments section. But they're right...it DID sound good. Another reason their comment is interesting is that i can believe a lot of what was said in their commentary...like that the director/writer of the film wasn't really interested in making a movie...but just wanted to be seen(haha) as a film maker...because it was a movie with some ideas, none of them fleshed out in any satisfactory way to me...like a child's drawing. Stick figures. What i DON'T believe is the amount of money this person, the supposed sound engineer, says they're owed...20 million? PLEASE! That's how much SOME A list actors make.
The OTHER things i don't believe are the 10 ratings. I would bet 20 million that they're associated with the movie, or people who MADE the movie, in some way. Their comments are lies. EACH of them were first time reviewers.
It was BAREly interesting enough to make me watch it till the end... i guess i did in hopes that SOMEthing would be enlightening. Didn't happen for me...some parts connected, but it's nowhere as profound as it pretends to be.
The OTHER things i don't believe are the 10 ratings. I would bet 20 million that they're associated with the movie, or people who MADE the movie, in some way. Their comments are lies. EACH of them were first time reviewers.
It was BAREly interesting enough to make me watch it till the end... i guess i did in hopes that SOMEthing would be enlightening. Didn't happen for me...some parts connected, but it's nowhere as profound as it pretends to be.
Frankly, I hated it.
I kept watching to see if somehow the dots would connect. I rewound trying to force them to connect; collected clues that led nowhere.
Unfortunately, the dots didn't connect to anything at all; the balloon dream was a moment of interesting visual but just another dead end. Not a single character redeemed the film. At best they were all unlikable; even the doctor who delivered the diagnosis.
It felt as though I was trapped in a modern art museum with a bunch of people looking at a blue square and pontificating a meaning. There was none to be found...just sad, random dots and an hour and forty minutes that I can't get back. My advise, skip this movie. Anything you spend the time doing will be an improvement.
I kept watching to see if somehow the dots would connect. I rewound trying to force them to connect; collected clues that led nowhere.
Unfortunately, the dots didn't connect to anything at all; the balloon dream was a moment of interesting visual but just another dead end. Not a single character redeemed the film. At best they were all unlikable; even the doctor who delivered the diagnosis.
It felt as though I was trapped in a modern art museum with a bunch of people looking at a blue square and pontificating a meaning. There was none to be found...just sad, random dots and an hour and forty minutes that I can't get back. My advise, skip this movie. Anything you spend the time doing will be an improvement.
I really enjoyed the surreal energy of the movie. I liked the colors in it it just felt like you are watching a dream. However this movie tries to tell lots of things such as betrayal, true love, childhood trauma, looking deep in to the life but you can't connect all of these things together and in result you can't connect to the movie and the characters. Everything just feels overwhelmed.
Even subplots don't add anything to the main plot and make you wondering "okay so what was that?" I feel it would be better if the writer and director would have sticked to one or two subjects in the movie.
Even subplots don't add anything to the main plot and make you wondering "okay so what was that?" I feel it would be better if the writer and director would have sticked to one or two subjects in the movie.
The way I see this movie is quite straightforward - it makes you think. It pushes you to delve deep down your soul and find answers to something you see but can not perceive easily. The manner of direction is splendid - it's
warm and cozy, with a touch of dreamy effect that makes you all enchanted until you see the final cut of the scene. It's lucid that people are tired nowadays. Most of them don't enjoy witnessing something that remains oblivious. They'd rather sit down with a sandwich and watch kitsch, or a crime story or a fervent romance that usually doesn't occur in life. What does transpire is the verity that we are born with a man and a woman living inside us. They navigate our life, they switch the driver's seat as required - they go hand in hand. It's just some people refuse to see it, some deny it. Some even don't realize it. But I believe that's one of the most important ideas of the film - to signify (in an artsy way) that the moment we acknowledge the aforementioned, the moment we accept it, only then we become complete.
Just the other day I made a comment here in a review for another film about how so much streaming has given us the opportunity to see unknown gems or films of interest that we never heard of or had the interest or opportunity to see in a theater. This is an example of the opposite providing us with a window to films that most would never want to see. I've no idea how to really review a film that is incomprehensible to me. I know some of the events I saw such as the beginning in which a man is told that he is going blind, his marriage is on the rocks and he meets a "mysterious" woman living in the forest that he seemingly falls for just about instantly. Very little after these facts make any sense to me. I first saw the lead actor here, Jim Sturgess, in the wonderful Across the Universe in 2007 in which he was both excellent as an actor and a singer and I predicted a big future. Despite working a lot, I'm not sure if he has ever been in a really good film since then, though that does not mean he is a bad actor and he even isn't bad here, though the character is absurd. The other two principals are Andreja Pejic as the woman in the woods and Antonia Campbell-Hughes as the unwanted wife. Pejic, at least here, cannot act and Campbell-Hughes is presented in such a dreary fashion it's hard to muster any interest in her. The writing here is a complete mess and this is an awful film.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Other Me?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Other Me
- Locações de filme
- Tbilisi, Geórgia(location)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 48 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for As Faces da Verdade (2022)?
Responda