Quarteto Fantástico: Primeiros Passos
Título original: The Fantastic Four: First Steps
Forçados a equilibrar seus papéis como heróis e a força dos laços familiares, o Quarteto Fantástico deve defender a Terra de um deus espacial voraz chamado Galactus e sua enigmática arauta, ... Ler tudoForçados a equilibrar seus papéis como heróis e a força dos laços familiares, o Quarteto Fantástico deve defender a Terra de um deus espacial voraz chamado Galactus e sua enigmática arauta, a Surfista Prateada.Forçados a equilibrar seus papéis como heróis e a força dos laços familiares, o Quarteto Fantástico deve defender a Terra de um deus espacial voraz chamado Galactus e sua enigmática arauta, a Surfista Prateada.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Estrelas
- Prêmios
- 4 indicações no total
Matthew Wood
- H.E.R.B.I.E.
- (narração)
Michael Bailey Smith
- Power Plant Worker #2
- (as Michael Bailey-Smith)
6,9211.6K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resumo
Reviewers say 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' is a visually stunning reboot with strong performances, particularly from Vanessa Kirby and Pedro Pascal. The film is praised for its retro-futuristic aesthetic, impressive visual effects, and engaging family dynamics. However, some critics note issues with pacing, underdeveloped characters, and a somewhat predictable plot. Despite these criticisms, the general consensus is positive, highlighting the film's potential to revitalize the Fantastic Four franchise within the MCU.
Avaliações em destaque
No character development
It's fine, it's watchable but it's crazy how by the end of the movie, we hardly know anything about the four main characters. It feels like we're "already supposed to know" which is insane for a "first" of a film franchise.
I loved the 2000s version of Fantastic Four because it focused on how each character coped with their powers and losing their human lives + the challenges they each faced fitting into society. Ben lost his family, and had to rebuild his life and find love again. It had depth. This one, it's like the director said to each actor- ok you have one character trope and we will milk it the entire movie.
My poor man Ben got like five minutes of screen time! Also why did Ben's rock body look 10x more real in the movie made 25 years ago?! Bad CGI, Spiderman made in 2000 had better effects.
I loved the 2000s version of Fantastic Four because it focused on how each character coped with their powers and losing their human lives + the challenges they each faced fitting into society. Ben lost his family, and had to rebuild his life and find love again. It had depth. This one, it's like the director said to each actor- ok you have one character trope and we will milk it the entire movie.
My poor man Ben got like five minutes of screen time! Also why did Ben's rock body look 10x more real in the movie made 25 years ago?! Bad CGI, Spiderman made in 2000 had better effects.
Just okay.
I mean I went to theater with quite high expectations. But honestly was a bit disappointed.
Movie tried to explore characters and their depth more but collectively as whole it went bit shallow and mediocre storyline.
It was definitely better than previous ones. But calling it one of the best MCU films? Um nope. Not at all.
Movie tried to explore characters and their depth more but collectively as whole it went bit shallow and mediocre storyline.
It was definitely better than previous ones. But calling it one of the best MCU films? Um nope. Not at all.
Looks nice...and thats it really.
My god, what is it with superhero films these days? They are just so lacklustre.
After the first trailer, I was unimpressed. I was really not keen on seeing the film, but then my son asked, and we also got to see Galactus in the last trailer, so I thought we would go for it. Even if Galactus is cool and the rest sucks, that would be something.
The film looks great; they nail the comic book look, and I cannot really fault it in that regard. Sadly, that's about it. The CGI ranges from passable to excellent, the script is very dumb in parts....but passable. The "female" Silver Surfer was fine; there was a plot point that made the Surfer's gender a necessary story element. The casting just felt off, not terrible, but something did not click.....And worst of all was the utter waste of Galactus.
Going by trailers, it looked like we would finally get some full-on action, but (no real spoiler apart from what he does) what we get is chatty Galactus, "ouch" Galactus, and walking past buildings Galactus....... Oh, and one other Galactus that made it even worse.
I have to say, right up to the Space trip and meeting (trying to keep details low), I was pleasantly surprised, and I did start to get my hopes up. Lesson learned, I guess.
After the first trailer, I was unimpressed. I was really not keen on seeing the film, but then my son asked, and we also got to see Galactus in the last trailer, so I thought we would go for it. Even if Galactus is cool and the rest sucks, that would be something.
The film looks great; they nail the comic book look, and I cannot really fault it in that regard. Sadly, that's about it. The CGI ranges from passable to excellent, the script is very dumb in parts....but passable. The "female" Silver Surfer was fine; there was a plot point that made the Surfer's gender a necessary story element. The casting just felt off, not terrible, but something did not click.....And worst of all was the utter waste of Galactus.
Going by trailers, it looked like we would finally get some full-on action, but (no real spoiler apart from what he does) what we get is chatty Galactus, "ouch" Galactus, and walking past buildings Galactus....... Oh, and one other Galactus that made it even worse.
I have to say, right up to the Space trip and meeting (trying to keep details low), I was pleasantly surprised, and I did start to get my hopes up. Lesson learned, I guess.
Something felt Missing
This was one of my most anticipated movies but it was disappointing for me.
Now for pros
1. It had some really good CGI at some points. Atleast it did The Thing right. He is being done dirty for a long time.
2. There was chemistry between the cast. The chemistry was better than 2015 version but it wasn't better than the 2005 one.
3. Galactus was done right you could feel his presence in IMAX.
4. I liked Joseph Quinn. He kept the legacy alive of good human torches.
Now for cons
1. Pedro was such a miscast. He played himself. He is not right for Reed.
2. It has more wacky shots than the good ones. The CGI looks unfinished at some points.
3. It was poorly edited. We know they cut 15 to 20 minutes and you could feel it. Something was missing.
4. CGI baby. I think it's about time they stop using the CGI baby. It was giving uncanny vibes.
5. Reed was really underwhelming. He barely used his powers.
6. Although it was only 1 hour 55 minutes long yet it felt longer than other movies which are longer. The pacing was horrible.
7. Most of it was spoiled in the trailers. If you saw all promotional videos and trailer you just saw 50 percent of the movie.
8. The last act was horrible. It felt like that Yelena scene from Black Widow.
9. This movie felt like it was missing a whole act. They should have given creative control to the director.
10. They could have done the post credit better.
This was a misfire by marvel and they should be worried beacuse it is directly related to Doomsday. It is really average. It places at 2nd last in the ranking of 2025 CBM.
I am really disappointed. Fantastic four are one of my favourite characters and they missed another time. When we will get a good F4 film? That's the question.
Now for pros
1. It had some really good CGI at some points. Atleast it did The Thing right. He is being done dirty for a long time.
2. There was chemistry between the cast. The chemistry was better than 2015 version but it wasn't better than the 2005 one.
3. Galactus was done right you could feel his presence in IMAX.
4. I liked Joseph Quinn. He kept the legacy alive of good human torches.
Now for cons
1. Pedro was such a miscast. He played himself. He is not right for Reed.
2. It has more wacky shots than the good ones. The CGI looks unfinished at some points.
3. It was poorly edited. We know they cut 15 to 20 minutes and you could feel it. Something was missing.
4. CGI baby. I think it's about time they stop using the CGI baby. It was giving uncanny vibes.
5. Reed was really underwhelming. He barely used his powers.
6. Although it was only 1 hour 55 minutes long yet it felt longer than other movies which are longer. The pacing was horrible.
7. Most of it was spoiled in the trailers. If you saw all promotional videos and trailer you just saw 50 percent of the movie.
8. The last act was horrible. It felt like that Yelena scene from Black Widow.
9. This movie felt like it was missing a whole act. They should have given creative control to the director.
10. They could have done the post credit better.
This was a misfire by marvel and they should be worried beacuse it is directly related to Doomsday. It is really average. It places at 2nd last in the ranking of 2025 CBM.
I am really disappointed. Fantastic four are one of my favourite characters and they missed another time. When we will get a good F4 film? That's the question.
Not So Fantastic at All
The script: bad.
Casting: bad.
Villain: bad.
CGI: not great either.
Honestly, this movie feels like it was made just to set up the Fantastic Four so they could be folded into the Avengers universe. I personally enjoyed the 2005 Fantastic Four way more.
Pedro Pascal is a talented actor, no doubt, but I just can't buy him as a superhero. To me, he fits much better in a villain role than as a member of the Fantastic Four.
Casting: bad.
Villain: bad.
CGI: not great either.
Honestly, this movie feels like it was made just to set up the Fantastic Four so they could be folded into the Avengers universe. I personally enjoyed the 2005 Fantastic Four way more.
Pedro Pascal is a talented actor, no doubt, but I just can't buy him as a superhero. To me, he fits much better in a villain role than as a member of the Fantastic Four.
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
Theatrical Releases You Can Stream or Rent
These big screen releases can now be watched from the comfort of your couch.
Trilha sonora
Ouça aqui um trecho da trilha sonora e continue ouvindo na Amazon Music.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe giant monster the Fantastic Four fight during the montage at the beginning of the movie is a nod to the cover of Fantastic Four #1 (1961)
- Erros de gravaçãoEarly in the movie, when Reed records cosmic sounds, the engraver starts on the inside edge of the disc, by the label. Later, when Johnny listens to the disc, he starts on the outside edge, like a normal LP, but this would result in him hearing the sound played backwards.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThere is an animated "Fantastic Four" sequence at the end of the closing credits.
- ConexõesFeatured in Animat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: The Rat of All My Dreams (2020)
- Trilhas sonorasGuanacoa
Written and Performed by Juan García Esquivel
Courtesy of Sony Music Entertainment (Mexico) S.A. de C.V.
By arrangement with Sony Music Entertainment
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
New and Upcoming Superhero Movies and Series
New and Upcoming Superhero Movies and Series
Here are the new and upcoming superhero movies and series that we're most excited to watch.
- How long is The Fantastic Four: First Steps?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Fantastic Four: First Steps
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 200.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 274.286.610
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 117.644.828
- 27 de jul. de 2025
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 521.858.728
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 55 min(115 min)
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente




