Psychopath with Piers Morgan

I gave a one star because of Piers and his awful questions. His questions are so ridiculous that mid question i think even Piers doesn't know what he wanted to ask. He is a very bad interviewer.

This is an episode of Serial Killer With Piers Morgan, that started in 2017. Not sure why all the negative reviews, and all the sympathy for a brutal necrophiliac except most humans really do not get what a psychopath really is, and Paris Bennett is exactly what a psychopath is. They kill simply because they want to. It means nothing more to them than when humans kill insects {like mosquitos, roaches, etc} and spiders. It's not complicated for them. Most humans don't seem to be able to get that basic concept. You are not going to get straight answers, you are not going to get emotion, remorse, logic, reason or anything 'insightful' from a psychopath. It's brains are completely different, literally, shows up on MRIs, SPET, and PET scans as a completely different brain. Most humans, as these reviews clearly show cannot wrap their heads around the fact that psychopaths are not human. You cannot get self awareness from something that is not aware of self, or some 'insights' from something that does not look inward. It's like asking a four legged animal to speak a human language fluently. It's not going to happen. Not sure what people are expecting especially based on these reviews. I'd like to see how most of these negative reviewers would interview a psychopath, I'd like to see how they'd react to being in the same room with one, especially one like this one. I'd like to see how many questions they would get answered - you do not treat psychopaths the same way you treat humans, and Piers Morgan was extremely careful and cautious. Piers Morgan is not the focus, and should not be. If you don't like him, don't watch, that simple. Why would you? Paris is up for parole 5FEB27, if it gets out, it will kill again, no question. There is no rehabilitation and recidivity is 100%. Like the mom says, they will not be safe, no one that crosses paths will be. Simple.

A tragic story, the murder of a young girl, and turmoil for a Mother who lost both of her children.

I don't love the format of the show, but then what would be a good format to tell such a harrowing story? I find most of these shows a little self indulgent, but it's oddly intriguing.

My sympathies are with the Mum and Sister, Paris is a complex character, I am no psychologist so don't have any right to analyse him, all I would say is the creator of a tragedy, and has seemingly no remorse.

Piers .... Oh Piers ... love him or hate him he's not afraid to ask the questions most would shy away from. He's relatively placid here, the so called experts are a bit over the top..

6/10.

Watched this because I find personality disorders facilitating. Firstly, I would have rather seen a detached (emotionally) analysis of Paris. Instead it was an hour long episode of two "professionals" in the field and piers Morgan. A woman who was described as a doctor in criminology and a profiler from the FBI (who you'd think would have projected his own feelings less). So for the full hour, we got Piers Morgan asking questions to someone who (probably for legal reasons) isn't going to be able to give much information, and two "professionals" who brought their own stereotypical idea of what a "psychopath" is and projected it onto everything Paris did. I wanted to hear from the psychiatrist who diagnosed him because I assume that person has spent years with him getting to actual understand how the personality disorder manifests in him. It's a personality disorder, everyone with a Certain personality disorder will share traits associated with it but at the end of the day, every personality disorder will manifest differently in every person. So I expected actual analysis, actual understanding of Paris as a psychopath. And instead it was just Piers Morgan asking pointless questions, we don't really know where this rage in Paris came from, we don't really know whether he was born a psychopath or became one (experts also don't know whether they're made or become based on their environments but if theyd done the work, we maybe could have had an idea if he had a tough environment growing up from his pov. It just made me angry watching it because it needed to be an unattached analysis of him and instead I have no idea what it was? It's not worth watching and provides 0 educational benefit.

Piers wants all of these people to be guilty- Guilty or not. He treats them like criminals with no voice