AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,7/10
3,4 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Se passa em Robociti, uma cidade supermoderna comandada por robôs. Nela, vivem animais de estimação mimados, como a gatinha Belle, a porca Sofia e o poodle Ronaldo.Se passa em Robociti, uma cidade supermoderna comandada por robôs. Nela, vivem animais de estimação mimados, como a gatinha Belle, a porca Sofia e o poodle Ronaldo.Se passa em Robociti, uma cidade supermoderna comandada por robôs. Nela, vivem animais de estimação mimados, como a gatinha Belle, a porca Sofia e o poodle Ronaldo.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Patrick Roche
- Roger
- (narração)
Natalie Dormer
- Belle
- (narração)
Felix Auer
- Bob
- (narração)
Jeff Burrell
- Ronaldo
- (narração)
Harvey Friedman
- Walter
- (narração)
Marty Sander
- Sophie
- (narração)
Bryan Larkin
- Slomo
- (narração)
- …
Naomi McDonald
- Chichi
- (narração)
- …
Andres Williams
- Edgar
- (narração)
- …
Tom Haywood
- Oscar
- (narração)
- …
Frank Schaff
- Asgar
- (narração)
Eddie Marsan
- The Cyborg
- (narração)
- …
Avaliações em destaque
It's just bad. The dialog is forced. Voice acting is terrible. Story is worse.
First off, movies have ratings for a reason...TV-Y7 means its not really meant for kids under 7. So all these posts about hiw this movie isn't suitable for their 2 year old..well duh...it says its not. Anyways, on to the movie...its a decent story with decent acting. It could be better but, I have seen far worse. It has a good lesson for kids about not judging others. Give it a try.. I mean..its not like you can't stop it and put something else on.
As the mother of an 8-year-old, I've watched a lot of bad animated movies in the past 18 months of the pandemic. This is easily the worst I have ever had to sit through.
The animation is worse than you get on cheaply-produced half-hour tv shows; the plotline is alternately incomprehensible and stupid; half of it seemed like just borrowed tropes from other, more successful films that were shoehorned together; and the editing is just bizarre.
In almost all the scenes, the animals are walking abnormally slowly - you end up feeling like the production guys said "Guys. This thing is only 72 minutes but we promised the distribution company we'd get them at least 115 minutes of content. You gotta add 40 minutes, stat!" There are weird, lengthy reaction shots (seriously, there is nothing weirder than watching 10 whole seconds of reaction shots between badly-animated animals, especially when there's literally no reason).
Anyway, the next time your kid asks you to watch a movie with them, I promise that watching Frozen II for the 11th time will be better than even 10 minutes of this disaster.
The animation is worse than you get on cheaply-produced half-hour tv shows; the plotline is alternately incomprehensible and stupid; half of it seemed like just borrowed tropes from other, more successful films that were shoehorned together; and the editing is just bizarre.
In almost all the scenes, the animals are walking abnormally slowly - you end up feeling like the production guys said "Guys. This thing is only 72 minutes but we promised the distribution company we'd get them at least 115 minutes of content. You gotta add 40 minutes, stat!" There are weird, lengthy reaction shots (seriously, there is nothing weirder than watching 10 whole seconds of reaction shots between badly-animated animals, especially when there's literally no reason).
Anyway, the next time your kid asks you to watch a movie with them, I promise that watching Frozen II for the 11th time will be better than even 10 minutes of this disaster.
The entire plot could be explained in a few sentences. It should really be a 5-10 minute animated short and even then it would be unimaginative.
The animation looks good in stills but in motion it's awful. The editing is just bad. Nothing feels smooth or natural. None of the dialogue is interesting at all.
If I gave netflix budget animation tools to your average high school level writers and designers you would get this movie. Even then I would give them a C-.
The animation looks good in stills but in motion it's awful. The editing is just bad. Nothing feels smooth or natural. None of the dialogue is interesting at all.
If I gave netflix budget animation tools to your average high school level writers and designers you would get this movie. Even then I would give them a C-.
This movie has absolutely no redeeming moments. No good parts, the most boring and useless hour and a half you'll ever spend. Watching paint dry or grass grow would be a better use of time. What Rodger leaves in front of the door to distract the robot doorman sums this movie up exactly.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe seventh theatrically released animated film to be scored by David Newman after The Brave Little Toaster (1987), DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp (1990), Rover Dangerfield (1991), Anastasia (1997), Ice Age (2002), and Animals United (2010).
- Erros de gravaçãoRoger is known to everyone as 'the thief from Robotcity', but strangely nobody knows him.
- Trilhas sonorasStir It Up
Performed by Joss Stone feat. Patti LaBelle
Written by Danny Sembello (as Dan Sembello), Allee Willis
(c) Songs of Universal, Inc., Streamline Moderne Music, Universal Music Corp., No Pain No Gain
By courtesy of Universal/MCA Music Publishing GmbH
By courtesy of Hollywood Records
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Pets United?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 5.095.210
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 29 min(89 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente