Godforsaken

While it's true found footage has been done to death (pun intended) this latecomer has to be one of the scariest I've ever seen, and I've seen 'em all. "Godforsaken" is a terrifying little gem out of the Great White North, and proof Canada can produce some scary stuff. After a delightfully disturbing start, it heads out in a completely unexpected direction, gradually building up to a terrifying final 20 minutes or so that is absolutely relentless and had me muting my television and (I'll admit it) covering my eyes more than once. After "28 Days Later" rewrote the rules, I'm completely surprised someone was able to add yet another layer to zombie lore. The writing was a very good, though sometimes the characters would do something that left me wondering if in their particular universe zombie movies don't exist. But anyway, the acting was substantially better than something with a budget this small had any right to be - no little thing when it comes to "watch-ability," if that's a word. Anyway - definitely worth a look if you're in the market for something different that just might scare the pants off of you.

GODFORSAKEN is a found footage horror movie which during its first few minutes begins like many others in terms of exposition, but then takes a sharp left turn. A woman resurrects at her own funeral, but she seems menacing and growling and then runs away. A few days later, a documentary crew arrives in town to make a film about this event, while ever stranger things keep happening in the locale.

The movie can be fairly divided into two halves: the first plays like a mystery movie, whereas the second is straight-up horror. Actually, this kind of structure is not that uncommon in the horror genre, and especially found footage horror: a "quiet" first half kind of gets us settled down before we are jolted up by the shock of the events in the second. The first movie I saw for which I became aware of this sort of dichotomous quiet-intense structure is Takashi Miike's excellent AUDITION (1999). Also, all of Eli Roth's movies follow it.

So while this kind of structure is not new, rarely has the first half of a horror movie been so nicely constructed as a mystery story. I was genuinely wondering where the movie was going with it. Once the mystery is basically cleared up, the second half begins. It turns out that it also delivers strongly on what it is supposed to do. It contains some of the most intense found footage horror sequences this side of REC (2007), which is in my opinion still the best found footage horror movie around.

Here comes now a major spoiler:

I loved the novel twist on the Zombie genre. There are probably thousands of zombie movies around, and after this story, I am left to wonder why this type of idea had not been realized before (to my knowledge). There have been occasional innovations in the Zombie genre, most prominently the "running zombies" of the RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD (1985) franchise, which ended up being practically universally adopted. Others, like the surprisingly creepy "silent" zombies in the found footage film THE NIGHT EATS THE WORLD (2018) were not widely copied. The innovation in GODFORSAKEN has to do with the religiously-themed way that townsfolk initially become victims. Why can people not come up with interesting variations on a well-worn concept more often?

Be that as it may, almost all the actors did a good job, and since most of the characters came across as likable, we care about them when they are in danger. There were some moments that strained credulity in terms of a character in severe danger who still bothers to film, but really not any more than most other found footage horror films.

My only real criticism is that the movie ends in a cliched way. Just before watching this movie, I had seen the found footage movie, M. O. M (2020), a really good take on the topic of psychopathic kids, and one of its greatest strengths was that the ending defied expectations. I suspect that a more innovative ending in GODFORSAKEN would have left the audience with a better impression of what is really a very good horror movie.

Cool twist conceptually. Low budget do no high expectations there but the acting - especially the mom - was terrible. If that could've been a tiny but more convincing this would be a strong contender for a solid atmospheric found footage horror.

It was original in how it combines a few genres of horror into found footage that you don't often see, or see done well. The set up for the story was very unsettling but then it looses steam at the end when you hit trope after trope. But if you're a found footage junkie like me who will watch anything in the sub, then you'll enjoy this, even if it doesn't give you the amazing suspension of disbelief that you need to feel the tension it tries to build.

This movie is amazing for what it is. It was made on a small budget and filmed in a small town, which gives it a unique charm. Many people can't appreciate it because they're brainwashed by CGI and big-budget films. The acting was okay, reminding me of a theatre production, which isn't a bad thing at all. The actors brought a raw, authentic feel to their performances, making the story more relatable and grounded. The film's simplicity is its strength, showcasing creativity and passion. It's a refreshing break from the high-tech, expensive spectacles we're used to. This movie should have a higher rating than it does.

Promising in the beginning. The premise was good but the acting & the execution was done horribly. I feel if the budget was bigger it would have came out a lot better. The actors weren't good. There was times when I thought it just looked horrible. I feel it could be a good book. I was suggestes this one & was not expecting what I got honestly.