AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
2,6/10
3,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma homenagem a seus ancestrais acaba despertando o espírito de Chandramukhi. Será que esta família conseguirá salvar a filha possuída com ajuda de um amigo destemido?Uma homenagem a seus ancestrais acaba despertando o espírito de Chandramukhi. Será que esta família conseguirá salvar a filha possuída com ajuda de um amigo destemido?Uma homenagem a seus ancestrais acaba despertando o espírito de Chandramukhi. Será que esta família conseguirá salvar a filha possuída com ajuda de um amigo destemido?
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Rico Alapan
- Nandakumar
- (as Azhagappan)
Avaliações em destaque
Kangana is no doubtedly on of the few best actresses we have right now. Why is Indian cinema wasting her on such craps and non actresses like Taapsee get to work with Rajkumar Hirani and SRK?? The movie was one of the stupidest I've watched and I'm sorry that she is wasted on this. I only watched it for her, ended up with a headache. She was great but the rest of the cast, the story, direction, writing etc. Was crap. Just crap. Watch it if you're a die hard Kangana fans, her appearance is pleasant, though for a very short time, but you have to tolerate the rest of the stupidity and below average cast for it or like me fast forward to her part.
I just want to vent a little about Chandramukhi before I say anything about Chandramukhi 2... both directed by P. Vasu. The only good thing to come out of Chandramukhi 2 is the realization that P. Vasu probably had not the slightest clue what Chandramukhi was actually about (as it simply was a remake of a Malayalam movie named Manichitrathazhu), and that he just found himself lucked into a successful movie. Now, I haven't watched the original Malayalam version myself, but I always thought I had a pretty good idea of what it might be.
It has always been my opinion that Chandramukhi is essentially a psychological thriller masquerading as horror, with carefully thought-out characters and conflicts, but only underneath 3-4 layers of P. Vasu's horrible directing. But sure, it was entertaining, so I was willing to give it a pass.
Ignoring the totally unnecessary fight scenes, the 'hearing your every thought' aspect of Rajni's character (which was used for way more than mere comic relief), the flying 50 meters across the living room, the cringe, the melodrama, the cheese, the continuity issues... essentially each and every little point P. Vasu might have added on top of the existing core concept... It was still at the very least entertaining.
Well, Chandramukhi 2 is proof enough to convince you that it was all a fluke. P. Vasu just happened to find a script where all the heavy lifting was already done, and where he need not do anything more but make it worse. Sadly, Chandramukhi 2 doesn't afford him the luxury of a pre-existing script, so the director ends up embarrassing himself on the big screen showing us exactly how he lucked himself into success 18 years ago.
Now onto Chandramukhi 2... You watch the trailer; you know it's bad. You watch the movie; you're surprised it's worse. There isn't a single good thing about this movie (except of course my P. Vasu rant), and it even goes as far as to be insulting to any and all members of its audience.
Raghava Lawrence no longer looks like a real person in his ungodly attempt to be Rajni; from his looks, to body language, to speech patterns... everything screams a cheap fake. The acting was unbelievably poor, the comedy was painful, the storyline was embarrassing, and I'd rather get possessed than to sit through another 150 minutes of a Raghava Lawrence ego trip.
I have also always blamed the filmmakers for these type of horrible movies, but now reading through the only 3 IMDB user reviews as of writing this, it's clear that the blame is also on these absolute braindead low IQ goobers who enable these kind of worthless movies to be made.
It has always been my opinion that Chandramukhi is essentially a psychological thriller masquerading as horror, with carefully thought-out characters and conflicts, but only underneath 3-4 layers of P. Vasu's horrible directing. But sure, it was entertaining, so I was willing to give it a pass.
Ignoring the totally unnecessary fight scenes, the 'hearing your every thought' aspect of Rajni's character (which was used for way more than mere comic relief), the flying 50 meters across the living room, the cringe, the melodrama, the cheese, the continuity issues... essentially each and every little point P. Vasu might have added on top of the existing core concept... It was still at the very least entertaining.
Well, Chandramukhi 2 is proof enough to convince you that it was all a fluke. P. Vasu just happened to find a script where all the heavy lifting was already done, and where he need not do anything more but make it worse. Sadly, Chandramukhi 2 doesn't afford him the luxury of a pre-existing script, so the director ends up embarrassing himself on the big screen showing us exactly how he lucked himself into success 18 years ago.
Now onto Chandramukhi 2... You watch the trailer; you know it's bad. You watch the movie; you're surprised it's worse. There isn't a single good thing about this movie (except of course my P. Vasu rant), and it even goes as far as to be insulting to any and all members of its audience.
Raghava Lawrence no longer looks like a real person in his ungodly attempt to be Rajni; from his looks, to body language, to speech patterns... everything screams a cheap fake. The acting was unbelievably poor, the comedy was painful, the storyline was embarrassing, and I'd rather get possessed than to sit through another 150 minutes of a Raghava Lawrence ego trip.
I have also always blamed the filmmakers for these type of horrible movies, but now reading through the only 3 IMDB user reviews as of writing this, it's clear that the blame is also on these absolute braindead low IQ goobers who enable these kind of worthless movies to be made.
To start with, the movie is excessively loud. I went to watch the movie for the pure nostalgia, but you are betrayed by poor writing, poor screenplay, and all round poor acting. The movie plays like a mega serial right from the start. If you were expecting Vadivelu to recreate the magic from Chandramukhi 1, you will be wrong! Nobody can save this movie.
The graphics are horrible. The CGI is cringe work. The dog fight sequence is among the worst.
If you thought Keeravani' s background score and music would be worth the watch, you are once again wrong!
Finally, the direction! You would not have expected P. Vasu to have directed this movie.
The graphics are horrible. The CGI is cringe work. The dog fight sequence is among the worst.
If you thought Keeravani' s background score and music would be worth the watch, you are once again wrong!
Finally, the direction! You would not have expected P. Vasu to have directed this movie.
Comment: Cinema Videography is worst than some cheapskate suntv serials. Storyline extremely miserable. Even the Pre school students can develop an innovative storylines. Director P. Vasu really need to learn how to make movie to entertain customers. Actor Ragawa Laurence should go to acting school to learn some basic acting skills. I hate his performance in the movie. 😤 I don't know what actress Rathiga tried in this movie. The comedy in this movie absolutely irritating. My ears are cried for every songs in this movie. The make up and hairstyle of Ragawa Laurence in this movie is really causing me nausea feeling. I will not watch Ragawa Laurence's upcoming movies anymore. I'll not watch P. Vasu's movie anymore.
CGI-BAD
MAKE UP- BAD
SCREENPLAY- BAD, BORING, PREDICTABLE
UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE. THIS IS 2023, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER SCREENPLAY AND CGI ETC BUT SUCH A WASTE.
The story has too many unnecessary dialogue. Lack of emotion. Poor taste for comedy scene, action scene. Nothing is special. Except kangana song. Eventho she was rather stiff at dancing she made it BUT HER MAKE UP AS THE GHOST IS PRETTY PATHETIC. Jyothika was better and THAT WAS IN 2005. Come on! She expression was subpar meanwhile the hero did a better job representing himself as the antagonist. The storyline is surprisingly so average and just waste of time.
UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE. THIS IS 2023, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER SCREENPLAY AND CGI ETC BUT SUCH A WASTE.
The story has too many unnecessary dialogue. Lack of emotion. Poor taste for comedy scene, action scene. Nothing is special. Except kangana song. Eventho she was rather stiff at dancing she made it BUT HER MAKE UP AS THE GHOST IS PRETTY PATHETIC. Jyothika was better and THAT WAS IN 2005. Come on! She expression was subpar meanwhile the hero did a better job representing himself as the antagonist. The storyline is surprisingly so average and just waste of time.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThree are three versions of the film- 158 minutes, 165 minutes, and 172 minutes.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Chandramukhi 2?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 4.049
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 52 min(172 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente