AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,2/10
2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
A guerra às drogas tem sido intensa em todo o mundo há décadas.A ex-agente da CIA Amaryllis Fox expõe as inacreditáveis forças econômicas que movimentam esse enorme comércio.A guerra às drogas tem sido intensa em todo o mundo há décadas.A ex-agente da CIA Amaryllis Fox expõe as inacreditáveis forças econômicas que movimentam esse enorme comércio.A guerra às drogas tem sido intensa em todo o mundo há décadas.A ex-agente da CIA Amaryllis Fox expõe as inacreditáveis forças econômicas que movimentam esse enorme comércio.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
A documentary series about drug smuggling around the world.
Reviews all stages of drug distribution. The economic viability of the Enship to participate in the process, the fears, the dangers, the endless demands.
Attempts by countries to eradicate the phenomenon and the expansion of global use following globalization, among other things, have been unsuccessful.
A very intriguing and interesting program.
Made excellent. Highly recommend it.
The Business of Drugs has some good info if you are new to the subject matter and and an engaging host to guide us through it. If you have watched things like this before however it doesn't really break any new ground other than the subtle political drops.
The first "hold on a sec" moment was, calling FARC "far right", when in reality FARC was a Marxist-Leninist rebel group.
From the Wiki, Ideology: Marxism-Leninism, Guevarism, Bolivarianism, Revolutionary socialism, Left-wing nationalism, Foco theory
Political position: Far-left
There is also the insinuation that legalizing cocaine might curb the black market. Obviously that would not be true (production costs, transportation, taxation, etc.) and the black market would still thrive. Also, Legalization would only introduce the product to more consumers as we are seeing with cannabis.
Strangely the legalization theory is undermined later in the documentary when bringing up the thriving black market with legal marijuana. Stranger still is the assertion of how marijuana is being used to keep black men in legal troubles so they can't vote and thus ensuring there will not be another Obama in the White House (sic). I'm not making this up, they said this, in a documentary that is supposed to be giving us facts. There is also mention that the high start up cost of legal marijuana is racist and sexist. Yeah, they said that too.
Add in another slight on conservatives and another remark blaming capitalism for the fentanyl crisis that in their opinion can be solved with more government and more regulations. A quick skim through the credits and I see the name Bloomberg, yep, that one.
It's a shame Netflix has these types of documentaries that seem to be soft political messages hiding inside of compelling subjects and some decent information. I think I just might stick to movies if this is going to be the case
The first "hold on a sec" moment was, calling FARC "far right", when in reality FARC was a Marxist-Leninist rebel group.
From the Wiki, Ideology: Marxism-Leninism, Guevarism, Bolivarianism, Revolutionary socialism, Left-wing nationalism, Foco theory
Political position: Far-left
There is also the insinuation that legalizing cocaine might curb the black market. Obviously that would not be true (production costs, transportation, taxation, etc.) and the black market would still thrive. Also, Legalization would only introduce the product to more consumers as we are seeing with cannabis.
Strangely the legalization theory is undermined later in the documentary when bringing up the thriving black market with legal marijuana. Stranger still is the assertion of how marijuana is being used to keep black men in legal troubles so they can't vote and thus ensuring there will not be another Obama in the White House (sic). I'm not making this up, they said this, in a documentary that is supposed to be giving us facts. There is also mention that the high start up cost of legal marijuana is racist and sexist. Yeah, they said that too.
Add in another slight on conservatives and another remark blaming capitalism for the fentanyl crisis that in their opinion can be solved with more government and more regulations. A quick skim through the credits and I see the name Bloomberg, yep, that one.
It's a shame Netflix has these types of documentaries that seem to be soft political messages hiding inside of compelling subjects and some decent information. I think I just might stick to movies if this is going to be the case
The documentary author wants to appear more than the information. At some point it starts to get really annoying.
The best 'drugs' documentary I've ever seen. It was a very successful job. The presenter is good, the stories are good, the topics mentioned are good, the analysis is good ... I felt the quality while watching.
Let's start with the positive!
-Great visuals
-Impressive access
-Interesting experts
-Smooth editing
The negatives; -Miss CIA operative can't help but mention her CIA background every 5 minutes. -Objectivity is out the window. To me that's a faux pas in documentaries!
The negatives; -Miss CIA operative can't help but mention her CIA background every 5 minutes. -Objectivity is out the window. To me that's a faux pas in documentaries!
Você sabia?
- ConexõesReferenced in kuji: Karginov and Konyaev: The Russian Pressure (2020)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Business of Drugs have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Business of Drugs
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração45 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Drogas - Oferta e Demanda (2020) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda