AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,4/10
11 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Constance é raptada diante dos olhos de D'Artagnan e, para salvá-la, o jovem mosqueteiro se alia com Milady. Depois que a guerra é declarada e Athos, Portos e Aramis já se juntaram à frente,... Ler tudoConstance é raptada diante dos olhos de D'Artagnan e, para salvá-la, o jovem mosqueteiro se alia com Milady. Depois que a guerra é declarada e Athos, Portos e Aramis já se juntaram à frente, um segredo do passado destrói todas as alianças.Constance é raptada diante dos olhos de D'Artagnan e, para salvá-la, o jovem mosqueteiro se alia com Milady. Depois que a guerra é declarada e Athos, Portos e Aramis já se juntaram à frente, um segredo do passado destrói todas as alianças.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 8 indicações no total
Julien Frison
- Gaston de France
- (as Julien Frison de la Comédie Française)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
It's good to return to the big screen, connect again with the magic of the dark room and much better to do it with a film that captivates you from beginning to end.
The second part of the great project led by Martin Bourboulon is much more vibrant, fast-paced and entertaining, with a narrative rhythm that does not falter at any time, but does not leave plot gaps either. The dramatic arc of the characters is much more solid and clear, Vincent Cassel as always does not need many minutes to demonstrate his stage presence, François Civil finishes shaping a rising D'Artagnan, but who steals the screen every time he appears is Eva Green, who from start to finish makes a truly impeccable hero-villain game.
A real pleasure to enjoy an epic film project far from the great arms of Hollywood.
The second part of the great project led by Martin Bourboulon is much more vibrant, fast-paced and entertaining, with a narrative rhythm that does not falter at any time, but does not leave plot gaps either. The dramatic arc of the characters is much more solid and clear, Vincent Cassel as always does not need many minutes to demonstrate his stage presence, François Civil finishes shaping a rising D'Artagnan, but who steals the screen every time he appears is Eva Green, who from start to finish makes a truly impeccable hero-villain game.
A real pleasure to enjoy an epic film project far from the great arms of Hollywood.
Well.. Since watching the first installment I really looked forward to this. The first one was everything I could ask for from a classic swashbuckling adventure.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
However, this left me with a kind of unsatisfying feeling but there were a lot of positives too.
The scenery and atmosphere and general is great. Everything I could ask for. And Eva Green.. What an actress she is.. I know she usually plays mysterious villains but still. She's just good.
In general I enjoyed the acting as well. Maybe not great from everyone but the characters were ok.
But then the plot and the climax.. I still don't know what was really going on and from what I've read I am not alone in that. I believe they changed a lot from the book as well which messed it up more than it should have (never read it but I will).
I will watch it again some day though to maybe get a better understanding and possibly after reading the book to at least know the core of the story a bit better.
Still watchable but could have been better.
"The Three Musketeers" by Alexandre Dumas comes to life in the cinematic adaptation, which, while deviating in some details from the book, manages to preserve the original work's essence. The story follows D'Artagnan and his loyal friends, Athos, Porthos, and Aramis, in a captivating 17th-century setting. Political intrigues, thrilling duels, and secret romances intertwine as they battle against the cunning Cardinal Richelieu and the enigmatic Milady de Winter. Although poetic licenses result in more battles than in the book, the film successfully captures the spirit of adventure, action, and romance that has made this classic swashbuckling tale endure.
I can't say that I enjoyed this as much as the first outing for this new breed of musketeers, but it's still an enjoyable and authentic looking adaptation of these timeless and honourable Dumas characters. We know that "Constance" (Lyna Khoudri) has been kidnapped and that the enamoured "D'Artagnan" (François Civil) is determined to get her back - but how? Well the almost fatal attack on the king (Louis Garrel) has galvanised everyone - friend and foe, and the musketeers determine that they must get to the ringleader of that plot before it is eventually accomplished and the kingdom is plunged into chaotic warfare. Now everyone suspects the malevolent Cardinal Richelieu (Eric Ruf) but surely it's not in his interests to kill Louis XIII? The Queen (Vicky Krieps) and her not-so-secret English lover Buckingham (Jacob Fortune-Lloyd) might be in the mix, or maybe just a disgruntled nobleman? "D'Artagnan" is first with a clue after he inadvertently rescues "Milady" (Eva Green) from a prison (after she fell off a cliff!) armed with a secret, coded letter. What does it mean? Can it help find his love and save the kingdom? Meantime, we start to learn a little more about this enigmatic "MIlady" and of her relationship with "Athos" (Vincent Cassel) whilst his two pals "Aramis" (Romain Duris) and the affable "Porthos" (Pio Marmaï) do their bit for the story and the country too. It looks great - the settings, the costumes, the combat scenes all smack of effort having been spent on making the scenarios ring true. I'm still no great fan of Eva Green, but here she starts to exude just the tiniest hint of menace as the story builds to the conclusion of this search for love and traitors. It's a wee bit more earnest, this time around - there's less humour and I missed that. I don't mean laugh out loud stuff, but here we rarely see all the musketeers together; their camaraderie isn't so obvious. This is essentially Civil v Green and that doesn't always work so well. Still, it's a solid and quickly paced adventure story that I found passed two hours effortlessly.
Plenty of positives including an exceptional cast (with the exception of Constance), the cinematography was mostly good (a few scenes a little too dark) , most of the scenes were well paced and costumes looked authentic.
However, the story seemed a lot more disjointed than the first movie and it didnt seem like there was enough time for character building (maybe we get spoilt with the amount of time series have but with 3 movies it felt like more could have been achieved). The worst part however, was the sudden revelation of super female fighters able to compete if not better the supposed best male sword fighters in the country....
The story was frustrating enough that i feel the need to re read the book after 20 plus years as im sure i remember it being a lot more coherent than this movie !
However, the story seemed a lot more disjointed than the first movie and it didnt seem like there was enough time for character building (maybe we get spoilt with the amount of time series have but with 3 movies it felt like more could have been achieved). The worst part however, was the sudden revelation of super female fighters able to compete if not better the supposed best male sword fighters in the country....
The story was frustrating enough that i feel the need to re read the book after 20 plus years as im sure i remember it being a lot more coherent than this movie !
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe film was shot back to back with its prequel Os Três Mosqueteiros: D'Artagnan (2023) for a total shoot of 150 days that started on August 16, 2021 and wrapped on June 3, 2022.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt different moments both movies feature firearms. These are incorrect. Actually, they are 150 years ahead, given the action is supposed to take place in 1627. The hand-weapons and riffles are revolutionary/Napoleonic era. Under Louis XIII's reign, firearms were much more rudimentary.
- ConexõesFollows Os Três Mosqueteiros: D'Artagnan (2023)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Three Musketeers - Part II: Milady?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Los Tres Mosqueteros: Milady
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- € 36.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 15.439.299
- Tempo de duração1 hora 55 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.41 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente