AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
1,7/10
26 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Uma horda de pássaros mutantes desce na cidade de Half Moon Bay, Califórnia. Com o número de mortos a aumentar, dois cidadãos conseguem defender-se, mas será que eles vão sobreviver?Uma horda de pássaros mutantes desce na cidade de Half Moon Bay, Califórnia. Com o número de mortos a aumentar, dois cidadãos conseguem defender-se, mas será que eles vão sobreviver?Uma horda de pássaros mutantes desce na cidade de Half Moon Bay, Califórnia. Com o número de mortos a aumentar, dois cidadãos conseguem defender-se, mas será que eles vão sobreviver?
Tippi Hedren
- Julie McNeal
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (as Ms. Tippi Hedren)
Patsy van Ettinger
- Nat's Mom
- (as Patsy vanEttinger)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesDue to the film's limited budget, director James Nguyen was unable to hire a full time film crew. As such, cast members performed the tasks that a crew typically would. In an effort to make the film appear more professional, Nguyen made up names for crew members that appear in the credits.
- Erros de gravaçãoRod mentions that his Ford Mustang is a hybrid car. There are no hybrid Mustangs.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditos"Ms. Tippi Hedren .... Footage from Julie and Jack"
- ConexõesFeatured in Birdemic: Experience Tour (2011)
- Trilhas sonorasThe Start of Something New
Courtesy of Smartsound Software
Avaliação em destaque
Given that "Birdemic" has been blasted by many critics, I think I should say something positive about it to start off with. The scenery of Half Moon Bay is agreeable, for one thing, and Ms. Moore has at least a modicum of charisma; also, anyone who appreciates a stylish blue hybrid Mustang rolling along in a stately manner gets to savor that very sight in many lingering shots. All positive aspects of this film.
Less positive aspects of this film are legion, so much so that I'm reminded of my wish that IMDb.com would allow a vote on a scale from 1 to 100 rather than 1 to 10 (in which case "Birdemic" would rate at least a 3 out of 100 for the reasons mentioned, and perhaps a 4 for meaning well (though the message about global warming comes across in a preachy and ham-handed manner)). Still, something about the profoundly amateurish quality of this film makes it feel a little unfair to rate it at all ~ in much the same way that it would feel wrong to grade a term paper on the basis of some rough notes jotted down before writing the paper rather than the paper itself. This film very much reminds me of a rough draft ~ a sort of rough visualization of what the film would have been if the producer had more resources at his disposal (thus making the upcoming larger-budget sequel all the more intriguing).
Yet, I wonder if this film might have been less entertaining if it were better made. If it featured better sound, editing, writing, acting, direction and special effects, it might just be a forgettable homage to "The Birds"; its very flaws elevate (or should I say depress?) it to a special level otherwise occupied by a few special films like "The Room" and "Manos: the Hands of Fate" ~ the legendary realm of films that are so bad they're good. So, giving it the benefit of the doubt as a real film and not just a rough draft, I tender my vote of 1 out of 10 and hope that other fans of this film will also give it an appropriately low vote and insure its rightful place on the Bottom 100 (once it gathers the requisite number of votes).
Less positive aspects of this film are legion, so much so that I'm reminded of my wish that IMDb.com would allow a vote on a scale from 1 to 100 rather than 1 to 10 (in which case "Birdemic" would rate at least a 3 out of 100 for the reasons mentioned, and perhaps a 4 for meaning well (though the message about global warming comes across in a preachy and ham-handed manner)). Still, something about the profoundly amateurish quality of this film makes it feel a little unfair to rate it at all ~ in much the same way that it would feel wrong to grade a term paper on the basis of some rough notes jotted down before writing the paper rather than the paper itself. This film very much reminds me of a rough draft ~ a sort of rough visualization of what the film would have been if the producer had more resources at his disposal (thus making the upcoming larger-budget sequel all the more intriguing).
Yet, I wonder if this film might have been less entertaining if it were better made. If it featured better sound, editing, writing, acting, direction and special effects, it might just be a forgettable homage to "The Birds"; its very flaws elevate (or should I say depress?) it to a special level otherwise occupied by a few special films like "The Room" and "Manos: the Hands of Fate" ~ the legendary realm of films that are so bad they're good. So, giving it the benefit of the doubt as a real film and not just a rough draft, I tender my vote of 1 out of 10 and hope that other fans of this film will also give it an appropriately low vote and insure its rightful place on the Bottom 100 (once it gathers the requisite number of votes).
- Hinosan417
- 28 de fev. de 2011
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Birdemic: Shock and Terror?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Birdemic: Shock and Terror
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 10.000 (estimativa)
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Birdemic: Choque e Terror (2010) officially released in India in English?
Responda