AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,6/10
25 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
A chegada de Patrick à casa de Marion e Tom desencadeia a exploração de eventos sísmicos de 40 anos anteriores.A chegada de Patrick à casa de Marion e Tom desencadeia a exploração de eventos sísmicos de 40 anos anteriores.A chegada de Patrick à casa de Marion e Tom desencadeia a exploração de eventos sísmicos de 40 anos anteriores.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 4 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Resumo
Reviewers say 'My Policeman' delves into forbidden love and societal repression, highlighting the struggles of LGBTQ+ individuals in the 1950s. Praised for poignant storytelling and strong performances by Harry Styles, David Dawson, and Emma Corrin, it also faces criticism for pacing, underdeveloped characters, and intimate scene handling. Emotional impact and beautiful craftsmanship are noted, yet some find it lacking depth and originality. The dual timelines and lead actors' chemistry are strengths, though transitions are seen as jarring.
Avaliações em destaque
Not reading the book, being interested by music of Harry Stiles and admiring Rupert Everett, it is just easy to not ignore this movie.
The expectation - maybe influenced by Firebird by Peeter Rabane. Sure, different context but same spider webb of intolerance .
The film is just gifted. Good acting, fair story, seductive images.
But you can not feel the tension , emotions and the deepness of the inner fights of characters.
So, you have one verdict - a beautiful film. But the connections are too fragile and you feel entire story as exterior one .
But it works.
And the delicate bitterness remains a precious gift from Michael Grandage.
The expectation - maybe influenced by Firebird by Peeter Rabane. Sure, different context but same spider webb of intolerance .
The film is just gifted. Good acting, fair story, seductive images.
But you can not feel the tension , emotions and the deepness of the inner fights of characters.
So, you have one verdict - a beautiful film. But the connections are too fragile and you feel entire story as exterior one .
But it works.
And the delicate bitterness remains a precious gift from Michael Grandage.
This film was so much more than I was expecting! It's a beautiful story and the chemistry between the younger characters was fantastic.
This is a beautiful reminder of how far we have come and a shocking reminder of how things used to be in the 1950s
The intimacy scenes were wonderful and tastefully shot. From early on you can feel the spark and tension between Tom and Patrick.
David Dawson is a brilliant Patrick and Harry styles did a great job with Tom. Emma corrin was wonderful as always.
My only criticism is I didn't recognise the older characters to be a good fit. They didn't seem to embody the characters as the younger actors.
All in all a great movie which left me in tears.
This is a beautiful reminder of how far we have come and a shocking reminder of how things used to be in the 1950s
The intimacy scenes were wonderful and tastefully shot. From early on you can feel the spark and tension between Tom and Patrick.
David Dawson is a brilliant Patrick and Harry styles did a great job with Tom. Emma corrin was wonderful as always.
My only criticism is I didn't recognise the older characters to be a good fit. They didn't seem to embody the characters as the younger actors.
All in all a great movie which left me in tears.
I've not read the book this is based on, so I'm torn if this is actually something of value or just a film version of something similar to a 1950's paperback type novel about "forbidden love." Somehow it has the feel of both. One thing it does have is a miscast actor as the pivotal character in this love triangle between two men and a one woman. Harry Styles showed a lot of potential in his small role in Dunkirk and he is not terrible here at all, but he totally lacks any sort of gravity or depth necessary for this role. He's a novice and it shows. Somehow the film is still interesting despite that. It's a three character film played by six actors in two different time periods, the late 1950's and the early 2000's. The other five all give fine performances of which I appreciated Gina McKee the most. This is very well directed, though it is not exactly an original storyline, but it still has relevancy and it is also a reminder of just how far gay rights have come since those horrid times not that many years ago. This is ultimately a sad story of three people who were never able to have the lives they wanted, most of that society's fault, some their own. There are some good old songs used to great effect here and the whole film has an appropriate mood. It's flawed, but I still admire some of it even if it might be similar to a 1950's forbidden love paperback.
Laid-back, understated, emotionally honest look at forbidden love in 1950s Britain and what it does to three people who love each other to varying extents, with a judicious, unshowy screenplay by Ron Nyswaner ("Philadelphia") and tender direction by Michael Grandage. It makes Brighton look gorgeous, and it peers into the lives of teacher Marion, policeman Tom, and museum curator Patrick with an appealing non-judgmentalism. You can pick at it: Why does the latter-day Tom treat Patrick like that, and how much does Marion know and when does she know it, and why don't we find out more about Marion's BFF, and the 1999 sequences aren't as rooted in 1999 as the 1957 sequences are in 1957. I still don't see what everyone sees in Harry Styles, it's a timid performance that could use more swagger. But the rest of the cast is excellent, and the fadeout had everyone around me weeping.
Harry Styles helped me propose to my girlfriend in October of 2014, so its hard for me not to be partial to him. Went into this movie having no idea what it was about and I'm glad. I will say that although Styles' acting skills have improved greatly, he was still outshined by his cast mates. There were times where his emotions came across as disingenuous and flat, but also times where I could tell that he's been working on his chops. Now, not knowing what I was going into, I must say I was quite surprised at some of the moments in this movie. There were a couple of things I wish they had conveyed better, such as the time between the 50s and 90s. I felt like there was big gap missing and I was left wondering what happened or how they lived their lives out between those years. I would recommend this to most of my friends, although I know some would cringe at the "love making" scenes. I, personally, was not put off by this and found it quite romantic at times, although Patrick did come across as pushy and off putting many times, almost creep like. In the end, I really enjoyed the film and look forward to seeing many more from Harry Styles. He's only going to improve.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesTo prepare for his role, Harry Styles memorized the entire script. According to the director, Styles could recite every character's lines in a given scene.
- Erros de gravaçãoYoung Patrick's hair recedes much more than "Old" Patrick's.
- Trilhas sonorasMemories Are Made of This
Written by Rich Dehr (as Richard Dehr), Terry Gilkyson and Frank Miller
Performed by Dean Martin
Courtesy of Capitol Records, LLC
Under licence from Universal Music Operations Ltd.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is My Policeman?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- My Policeman
- Locações de filme
- Venice, Itália(Canal and waterside scenes in Venice, Italy.)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 53 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente