AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,3/10
3,3 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um soldado americano estacionado em Roma com o Vaticano explodido embarca numa viagem de herói para descobrir e defender-se contra um inimigo desconhecido que ameaça o mundo inteiro.Um soldado americano estacionado em Roma com o Vaticano explodido embarca numa viagem de herói para descobrir e defender-se contra um inimigo desconhecido que ameaça o mundo inteiro.Um soldado americano estacionado em Roma com o Vaticano explodido embarca numa viagem de herói para descobrir e defender-se contra um inimigo desconhecido que ameaça o mundo inteiro.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 1 indicação no total
Carla Cassola
- Woman in the Church
- (as Carla Lucia Cassola)
ZiXuan Chen
- Jiao's Son
- (as Zixuan Chen)
Avaliações em destaque
Maybe I am not an intellectual fella who ain't cool enuff to dig the underlying meaning but I have enjoyed Abel Ferrara's few films.
This movie is a boredom filled with unnecessary dark, grimy n surrealistic photography and a pinch of headache inducing shaky cam stuff.
The director Abel Ferrara played Reno Miller, an artist who is slowly descending into madness in the cult movie Driller Killer.
Well, in this movie the symptoms of madness is all over n Ethan Hawke too seems to be suffering from folie a deux.
This movie is a boredom filled with unnecessary dark, grimy n surrealistic photography and a pinch of headache inducing shaky cam stuff.
The director Abel Ferrara played Reno Miller, an artist who is slowly descending into madness in the cult movie Driller Killer.
Well, in this movie the symptoms of madness is all over n Ethan Hawke too seems to be suffering from folie a deux.
Just know that this is a film about a guy running around a city. There is no real action, it's certainly not sci-fi in any conceivable way and it is an adventure only in the sense that you are watching it.
The film begins and ends with Ethan Hawke, the actor, talking to the audience about the film. The first part is "I love Abel Ferrara and we are trying to make this film" and the last part is "When I got the script to this I didn't get it and now, after I watched the film and you watched the film, no one gets it". In between lies the movie, a seemingly random mix of scenes filmed in grainy low detail, with unfocused shots, featuring people without names that do random things. I know Ferrara had a grand vision for what the film is saying, but I assure you you won't understand what that was. If you search the web for explanations of the film, they are mostly interpretations of what Ethan Hawke says at the end, not of what happened in the movie.
In that sense, this is true art: I made it, you either like it or hate it, I don't care!
But this is also why this film deserves its low rating. It doesn't care. It's not a communication, where one has to take care the message is both received and understood, it's the mad ramblings of homeless people, the rantings of political figures, that friend who won't shut up and interrupts everyone to talk about themselves, the avantgarde painting of spread feces where you have to believe there is a beautiful painted woman underneath because the artist says so. It's a monologue, a stream of consciousness with which you might resonate, but never truly comprehend. Perhaps this is one of those films that are better on LSD? Who knows.
Bottom line: Spewing out thoughts and perceptions without any structure or care of your audience is not art, it's vomiting. Some might enjoy it, for their own reasons, but that's all it is.
The film begins and ends with Ethan Hawke, the actor, talking to the audience about the film. The first part is "I love Abel Ferrara and we are trying to make this film" and the last part is "When I got the script to this I didn't get it and now, after I watched the film and you watched the film, no one gets it". In between lies the movie, a seemingly random mix of scenes filmed in grainy low detail, with unfocused shots, featuring people without names that do random things. I know Ferrara had a grand vision for what the film is saying, but I assure you you won't understand what that was. If you search the web for explanations of the film, they are mostly interpretations of what Ethan Hawke says at the end, not of what happened in the movie.
In that sense, this is true art: I made it, you either like it or hate it, I don't care!
But this is also why this film deserves its low rating. It doesn't care. It's not a communication, where one has to take care the message is both received and understood, it's the mad ramblings of homeless people, the rantings of political figures, that friend who won't shut up and interrupts everyone to talk about themselves, the avantgarde painting of spread feces where you have to believe there is a beautiful painted woman underneath because the artist says so. It's a monologue, a stream of consciousness with which you might resonate, but never truly comprehend. Perhaps this is one of those films that are better on LSD? Who knows.
Bottom line: Spewing out thoughts and perceptions without any structure or care of your audience is not art, it's vomiting. Some might enjoy it, for their own reasons, but that's all it is.
It's worse. Oh how Ethan Hawke has fallen. He's capable of more than this. Someone get Ethan Hawke a better role! Don't make the mistake I did in thinking, "It can't be THAT bad" and then watching it. Just skip it and save yourselves. It's too late for me.
Shaky camera, blurry image, Ethan Hawk, with a mask, more shaky camera, sometimes unfocused, darker image, filming without purpose, or on some objective, more blurry image, then BAM! Car lights, then darkness, unfocused image, and goes on like that till the end, when the big secret is revealed, director was high. The end.
Incoherent, pseudo-artistic, boring and much more, but not worth one and a half hours of your life, even in a lockdown. I gave it a try despite the bad reviews, but they are all truthful. You can´t even spoiler stuff because no one can tell what this could be about in the first place.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesEthan Hawke was one of the celebrities interviewed for Abel Ferrara's documentary "Chelsea on the Rocks" (2008)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Zeros and Ones?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Zeros and Ones
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 4.604
- Tempo de duração1 hora 27 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente