Doze pessoas comuns são escolhidas para o júri do julgamento de um assassinato tão traumatizante quanto controverso, onde uma mulher é acusada de matar uma criança.Doze pessoas comuns são escolhidas para o júri do julgamento de um assassinato tão traumatizante quanto controverso, onde uma mulher é acusada de matar uma criança.Doze pessoas comuns são escolhidas para o júri do julgamento de um assassinato tão traumatizante quanto controverso, onde uma mulher é acusada de matar uma criança.
- Prêmios
- 6 vitórias e 23 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Well it was a long and painful wait, with some cringeworthy bits but overall the outcome was worth it. Quite satisfying on a few accounts. Would not like to be on a murder trial after watching this!
This 10 part miniseries about a murder trial where there is no body and a suppressed backstory is really more about the lives of the jurors, how the trial (and other jurors) impact them and how it informs their thoughts about the case.
There are many characters with concurrent and intersecting stories on each, as well as the trial itself. Some are more convincing than others and especially in the first 4-5 episodes, it was a little slow going at times and I wondered if some of the scenes were even relevant. Perhaps it needed a bit of trimming to maybe 8 episodes to tighten it up a little.
The script is decent and occasionally brilliant, especially in the second half of the series. The acting is variable - Brooke Satchwell shines as juror Georgina, who portrays wrestling with her personal circumstances perfectly - although generally the standard is at least competent. Sam Neil is his usual urbane excellent self as the defence attorney although interestingly there is no personal story attached to either prosecutor or defence.
The ultimate trial outcomes may be the epitome of injustice when taken on face value, but on reflection maybe the right results were achieved, even if the methods to get there were highly flawed. If this was intentional, then it's worth an extra star!
One thing though - if all juries are like these people, best not to come before one!
There are many characters with concurrent and intersecting stories on each, as well as the trial itself. Some are more convincing than others and especially in the first 4-5 episodes, it was a little slow going at times and I wondered if some of the scenes were even relevant. Perhaps it needed a bit of trimming to maybe 8 episodes to tighten it up a little.
The script is decent and occasionally brilliant, especially in the second half of the series. The acting is variable - Brooke Satchwell shines as juror Georgina, who portrays wrestling with her personal circumstances perfectly - although generally the standard is at least competent. Sam Neil is his usual urbane excellent self as the defence attorney although interestingly there is no personal story attached to either prosecutor or defence.
The ultimate trial outcomes may be the epitome of injustice when taken on face value, but on reflection maybe the right results were achieved, even if the methods to get there were highly flawed. If this was intentional, then it's worth an extra star!
One thing though - if all juries are like these people, best not to come before one!
I am enjoying this series though it is a bit drawn out. There is some good acting - Sam Neil, Kate Mulvany and a few others.
I find it hard to connect with a lot of the characters. Largely because they make such obviously bad decisions so often and try to cover up their tracks most of the time. It gets a bit predictable.
There have been quite a few twists and turns, most of which are implied an episode or so before they are revealed, making them less impactful when we find out.
It has a classic Australian feel to it, though I would love to see some Aussie drama that has characters that represent a smarter, more self aware side of the Australian psyche.
I find it hard to connect with a lot of the characters. Largely because they make such obviously bad decisions so often and try to cover up their tracks most of the time. It gets a bit predictable.
There have been quite a few twists and turns, most of which are implied an episode or so before they are revealed, making them less impactful when we find out.
It has a classic Australian feel to it, though I would love to see some Aussie drama that has characters that represent a smarter, more self aware side of the Australian psyche.
I must admit I wasn't sold on this but thought why not.
It slowly delves into the personal relationships of the jurors who are over seeing the murder of a young 14 year old girl whose auntie is on trial for the crime.
I'm not usually a Brooke Satchwell fan at all, and I'm actually enjoying her in this.
The relationships are slow winding, and 2 eps it I think it'll be a ripper. I thoroughly enjoyed Mare of Eastown 'feels' a lot like that.
It slowly delves into the personal relationships of the jurors who are over seeing the murder of a young 14 year old girl whose auntie is on trial for the crime.
I'm not usually a Brooke Satchwell fan at all, and I'm actually enjoying her in this.
The relationships are slow winding, and 2 eps it I think it'll be a ripper. I thoroughly enjoyed Mare of Eastown 'feels' a lot like that.
After watching the first season of the show you would be remised if all you got from the first season was confusion and 'ah what just happened?'. Well the first season was poorly written and it does show in the side plots and the confusing murder trial narrative, in a case that should of had it's jurors kicked off the jury for many reasons.. I thought "oh this can't get much worse.." and it did. I wanted someone to apologise to Sam Neill for the first season.
When I heard it had been renewed for a second season, I wasn't too thrilled after all Foxtel was heading into life without a leader in Brian Walsh, but when I seen the cast list and the fact the show had been moved from one state to another it gave me hope again.
I will say the second season is much better then the first, with one episode in particular with a very surprising twist I don't think anyone saw coming..
So.. If you want, skip season one, season two is way better then one. Enjoy!
When I heard it had been renewed for a second season, I wasn't too thrilled after all Foxtel was heading into life without a leader in Brian Walsh, but when I seen the cast list and the fact the show had been moved from one state to another it gave me hope again.
I will say the second season is much better then the first, with one episode in particular with a very surprising twist I don't think anyone saw coming..
So.. If you want, skip season one, season two is way better then one. Enjoy!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesRenewed for a second season.
- Erros de gravaçãoThough the film is set in Australia, where they use the standard format for dates dd-mm-yyyy, the film keeps using the wrong date format that is only used in the US. Presumably they are doing this for the US market, in case they don't understand what the 17th of June means.
- Citações
Jazmyn Tanner: Ok Karen..
Sharon Crabtree: It's Sharon.
- ConexõesFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episode #6.40 (2023)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does The Twelve have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Twelve
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h(60 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente