Damon's Revenge

After surviving the Liberty Manor massacre in Rhode Island, Adrianna (Chelsea Vale) is viewed as a sort of local celebrity. Her wild child friend from college (Hannah Dannelly) invites her out to a rural vacation home to party with friends and recover. Unfortunately, Tina has an unhealthy interest in the massacre and, worse, the Wampanoag mafia chief might no longer be in custody. Havoc ensues.

"Damon's Revenge" (2022) adequately relays what happens to the survivors of the film from the year before, but you won't find much elaboration on the title character. Disregarding his appearing in a recap, Damon doesn't surface until the very end. I was hoping for details on why he likes to torment Indian lasses in his torture chamber, as well as why the Wampanoag mafia hired him (no doubt because he's an effective killer, huh?).

Another issue is that this isn't as ambitious as the first movie, but at least it's a little creative with the hackneyed cabin-in-the-woods plot. The nudity is way toned down and there are no torture chamber sequences (not that I care about either). The women aren't as notable either. Still, the voice dubbing has been fixed (compared to the prior film) and Chelsea Vale makes for a serviceable protagonist, plus there are enough interesting things to keep one's attention, like the Wampanoag chief convincing an Indian deputy to do such-and-such.

The film runs 1 hour, 29 minutes, and was shot in Cromwell, Connecticut, which is in the heart of the state just south of Hartford on the Connecticut River.

GRADE: C+

It's not over until the fat man sings, and 10 minutes in I'm singing soprano with gusto. Feels like Tom Sizemore has given up on his craft and Michael Madsen must have been there for the free food. If you manage to keep watching, you will be rewarded with bad acting and vocal fry. The movie should have used Robert LaSardo more, he was the best actor in this thing. Not even the brief nudity at 56:38 and the following shower scene could raise my rating. Would I recommend this, nope.

Lack of plot, acting, anything redeeming. Could you make it anymore obvious that the positive reviews are fake? Most of these reviews complimenting the acting when in an objective reality it has some of the worst acting I have seen in any film period. IMDB really needs to get control of the fake reviews and ratings. Any person with a brain would see this is no more than a 1 star. You would show this in university film classes to show students exactly what NOT to do. Unacceptable excuse for a movie.

It's a sequel to Burial Ground Massacre. I knew something was wrong, but when everything is wrong, it's easy to miss it. Anyway, the plot you read on IMDB starts about 1 hour into the movie, don't even remember what happened before that. It has some hilariously bad moments, and overall the line deliveries, sound editing and dialog are all so terrible that you may get a decent laugh out of it. Not 100% sure there was a plot though.

Story was strong, if not original, cast was better than "B" grade.......played out well but seemed as if the cast was told..."Don't rehearse, It will seem more natural if read off an auto autocue machine" So looks like Zero direction, Zero retakes, Zero impute into how the scenes were filmed.... The actors just took the easy money an run.... Tom....your better than this???