Apartamento 7A

Rosemary's Baby is one of my favourite films ever, still stands strong almost half a century later. I watch it time and time again and still notice new things.

When I seen there was a prequel made I gave it no notice, proper eye roll stuff. Why? Can't they just leave a classic as is?

Anyway! Was at a loss and put it in tonight, and I actually enjoyed it. The story line was good, I loved the Easter eggs of the original... its made me want to put on the OG again ha.

I think the low score for this is unjustified, I think you need to have seen the OG for the groundwork of this story to understand it. If watched as a stand alone it would seem abit meh.

So yeh pleasantly surprised... not a patch on OG but a welcomed reimagining using the original story and characters before beloved Rosmary moved in.

On that note. I urge anybody that hasn't.... please watch ROSEMARYS BABY like now!

"Apartment 7A" is a 2024 psychological thriller that serves as a prequel to the iconic horror film "Rosemary's Baby." It follows Terry Gionoffrio, an aspiring actress grappling with a career-ending injury, as she moves into the infamous Bramford building.

What Works: * Strong Performances: Julia Garner delivers a compelling performance as Terry, capturing her vulnerability and growing paranoia convincingly. Dianne Wiest and Kevin McNally, as the unsettling Castevets, are suitably eerie and unsettling.

* Atmospheric Setting: The film effectively recreates the eerie ambiance of the Bramford building, with its claustrophobic corridors and unsettling undertones.

What Could Be Better: * Pacing Issues: The first half of the film feels slow-paced, struggling to build suspense and tension effectively.

* Lack of Innovation: While it pays homage to the original, "Apartment 7A" doesn't offer much new to the table. It relies heavily on familiar tropes and fails to truly capitalize on its chilling premise.

* Uneven Horror Elements: The film struggles to blend its horror elements seamlessly. Some scenes are genuinely unsettling, while others feel forced or underwhelming.

Overall: "Apartment 7A" is a decent watch for fans of "Rosemary's Baby" who are curious about the backstory. However, it ultimately fails to reach the chilling heights of its predecessor. While the performances are strong and the atmosphere is suitably eerie, the film suffers from pacing issues and a lack of originality.

Recommendation: Rent or stream it if you're a fan of the original and enjoy psychological thrillers.

Disclaimer: This is just one perspective, and individual opinions may vary.

Okay. So I liked the period part of this.

And did I remember before I started watching this that it was a prequel to Ira Levin's novel/Roman Polanski's film? No. Didn't dawn on me until I said to myself, "Self, there's Dianne Wiest! And she's doing a Ruth Gordon impression? Oh, duh. This is that Rosemary's Baby cash grab that was put into production because Satanic pregnancies are all the rage in this post-Dobbs landscape." I think this is the 8th devil fetus movie this year alone. But here we are.

I like Dianne Wiest. I don't think Julie Garner was horrible. But this seemed more like a rehash of the Mia Farrow classic - with some aspects a scene-for-scene matchup. Yeah, it's with a single unwed mom set in the pre-Roe era. I mean that is the film's entire premise and reason for existing.

But the film doesn't expand on the Leviniverse beyond saying that things at the Bramford go back before the Woodhouses moved in.

Also, I don't get why they didn't just get Josh Groban for the Josh Groban guy. The did-get guy was easy to look at but the entire time I couldn't stop thinking he was supposed to be Josh Groban.

The movie is watchable. Nothing groundbreaking, nothing must-see, nothing revelatory narrative-wise. It's fine. I did find the ending somewhat pleasant while odd but entirely foreseeable.

I get that there are quite a few fans of the original (if you can call it that since this is a prequel), I understand that stories could have been tied better... But, you know what? This is a good movie. The main character is likeable, smart, and relatable. The story is interesting and well-paced. There are some creepy characters but they never felt cartoonish. I enjoyed it a lot and it's one of the best horror movies of 2024.

By now you probably know the story and even how it ends, but try to enjoy this movie as a stand-alone. Try not to bother yourself "nobody asked for this, originality is dead", watch it and you just might like it.

I'm not mad about this. Probably because I'm not a fan of the original and to me, Julia Garner is a much better actress than Mia Farrow, so it was a delight to follow her journey. And of course Diane Wiest is always superb. You can see how much she relishes this role. The visuals were great, and I can't quite decide what hits harder - Terry's Liza Minelli cut or Satan's whole bedazzled look.

I don't understand why everyone keeps saying that it's the same movie as the original... Like, how is it the same? The basic premise of woman getting pregnant by a sinister force is the same, sure. But the lead character acts differently, and correct me if I'm wrong - and I might be because I've only seen the original once and I didn't like it - but Mia Farrow only found out what she gave birth to at the very end. And Terry got wise to things much faster and... well, spoilers aside, the story does not unravel in the same way in Apartment 7A.