Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAt the end of WWII, a tough British officer leads a band of Allied commandos into enemy territory in Bavaria on one last impossible mission to extract an American held hostage by the Germans... Ler tudoAt the end of WWII, a tough British officer leads a band of Allied commandos into enemy territory in Bavaria on one last impossible mission to extract an American held hostage by the Germans.At the end of WWII, a tough British officer leads a band of Allied commandos into enemy territory in Bavaria on one last impossible mission to extract an American held hostage by the Germans.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Avaliações em destaque
Of the many recent low budget war movies, most are just plain terrible. I would not call this movie terrible, but neither would I say it was a blockbuster. I was not disappointed to watch it.
The CGI and pyrotechnics were obviously poorly done, however, I found the quality of acting fairly good quality.
The authenticity of the vehicles, weapons and uniforms was correct for the period of time, but the film locations and sets was off putting. Supposedly set in Bavaria in Germany, which is high alpine country, this movie was obviously filmed in British countryside with no mountains at all or even a high hill to be seen. The buildings were clearly English cottages, not at all even resembling Bavarian architecture.
The goofs came regularly throughout the entire movie. For example, the parachute harnesses were incorrectly worn and there was no hook before jumping, nor did the parachutes have a rip chord. The occasional modern vehicle sighted in the background, or a modern electrical switch on a wall stuck out like sore thumbs while watching the movie, as did a modern hand grenade being thrown down the stairs. Also staring the viewer in the face were the armbands of the Germans, who were foot soldiers, however, the emblem (wolfsangel) was actually that warn by the SS2nd Panzer Division of WW2.. However, even with all the negatives within the movie, the storyline was good and plausible, and the movie did not fail in delivering that story, although, I think the length of the movies was more than it needed to be. There was way too much dialogue which in most parts, was not relevant to the story.
In all, not a top notch war flick, but is passible.
The CGI and pyrotechnics were obviously poorly done, however, I found the quality of acting fairly good quality.
The authenticity of the vehicles, weapons and uniforms was correct for the period of time, but the film locations and sets was off putting. Supposedly set in Bavaria in Germany, which is high alpine country, this movie was obviously filmed in British countryside with no mountains at all or even a high hill to be seen. The buildings were clearly English cottages, not at all even resembling Bavarian architecture.
The goofs came regularly throughout the entire movie. For example, the parachute harnesses were incorrectly worn and there was no hook before jumping, nor did the parachutes have a rip chord. The occasional modern vehicle sighted in the background, or a modern electrical switch on a wall stuck out like sore thumbs while watching the movie, as did a modern hand grenade being thrown down the stairs. Also staring the viewer in the face were the armbands of the Germans, who were foot soldiers, however, the emblem (wolfsangel) was actually that warn by the SS2nd Panzer Division of WW2.. However, even with all the negatives within the movie, the storyline was good and plausible, and the movie did not fail in delivering that story, although, I think the length of the movies was more than it needed to be. There was way too much dialogue which in most parts, was not relevant to the story.
In all, not a top notch war flick, but is passible.
IN A NUTSHELL:
At the end of World War II, a tough British officer leads a band of Allied commandos into enemy territory in Bavaria on one last impossible mission to extract an important American scientist held hostage by the Nazis.
The suspenseful war drama was directed by Giles Alderson. The story was written by Toby Kearton and Samuel Christopher Ellis. The screenplay was written by Ben Mole and is based on a true story.
THINGS I LIKED: I really enjoy World War II movies because there was such a clear line between the Allies and the Nazi enemies. In this film, the lines blur a little bit, offering unique insight.
Ed Westwick plays the leading man. I like him, although it was often hard to understand his subtle, facial expressions at times.
Matt Willis plays a large role in the movie. He kind of reminded me of a young Russell Crowe both in looks and voice quality. Did you know he's the co-founder and bassist in the band "Busted"?
Max Themak plays the sadistic Nazi leader. He is so over-the-top in his viciousness that it's easy to hate him.
There are some suspenseful moments.
The team looked like they were trying hard to create an interesting movie.
THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: There are some cliched moments stolen from other/better movies.
I wished I had captions to read during this movie because sometimes, it was hard to understand what people were saying.
The child actors were not very good. I feel so mean writing that.
As a Grammar Nazi, I wished they had added punctuation to the end card toward the end of the movie. I always appreciate reading "the rest of the story" at the end of movies like this.
The field gear and locations in the movie aren't accurate. True history buffs will be annoyed by that. The film would have definitely benefited from having a military consultant on set.
Ultimately, the movie isn't memorable.
TIPS FOR PARENTS: Brutal violence Bloody deaths Profanity, including 1 F-bomb
THEMES: War Hope Family Science The value of human life
The suspenseful war drama was directed by Giles Alderson. The story was written by Toby Kearton and Samuel Christopher Ellis. The screenplay was written by Ben Mole and is based on a true story.
THINGS I LIKED: I really enjoy World War II movies because there was such a clear line between the Allies and the Nazi enemies. In this film, the lines blur a little bit, offering unique insight.
Ed Westwick plays the leading man. I like him, although it was often hard to understand his subtle, facial expressions at times.
Matt Willis plays a large role in the movie. He kind of reminded me of a young Russell Crowe both in looks and voice quality. Did you know he's the co-founder and bassist in the band "Busted"?
Max Themak plays the sadistic Nazi leader. He is so over-the-top in his viciousness that it's easy to hate him.
There are some suspenseful moments.
The team looked like they were trying hard to create an interesting movie.
THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: There are some cliched moments stolen from other/better movies.
I wished I had captions to read during this movie because sometimes, it was hard to understand what people were saying.
The child actors were not very good. I feel so mean writing that.
As a Grammar Nazi, I wished they had added punctuation to the end card toward the end of the movie. I always appreciate reading "the rest of the story" at the end of movies like this.
The field gear and locations in the movie aren't accurate. True history buffs will be annoyed by that. The film would have definitely benefited from having a military consultant on set.
Ultimately, the movie isn't memorable.
TIPS FOR PARENTS: Brutal violence Bloody deaths Profanity, including 1 F-bomb
THEMES: War Hope Family Science The value of human life
Out of loyalty to Rupert Graves for "Room with a View" (1985) and "Maurice" (1987) I can't go lower than a five for this, but it's really not very good. Indeed, that star of stage and screen features for just about five minutes of this otherwise rather cheaply presented story of a group of British soldiers sent to retrieve this brilliant (American) scientist and his daughter from the hands of the Nazis. Led by "Norwood" (Matt "Busted" Willis) and assisted by a terribly wooden Ed Westwick ("Wallace"), Sam Gittins ("Deegan") and Jack Parr's "Owens" we have quite an easy-on-the-eye group of squaddies facing a tough task navigating the forest to find their target, all whilst the dastardly "Von Sachs" (Max Themax) - straight from "'Allo 'Allo" - is routinely slaughtering the locals and anyone who comes into contact with them. Their escape plans suggests "Roops" only had one spare filming day, or that he lives next door to a favour-owed director, so much of the film is actually about their duel with the enemy as they try to escape. The cameraman has probably had the best of it, placing his kit inside bushes and trees and at times that does help give this just a semblance of menace, but for the most part this just looks like what it is. An assembly of seriously mediocre talent trying to tell a serious story in the manner of an under-resourced pantomime. I really wouldn't bother.
This has to be one of the worst war movies ever created. I cannot remember the name of the worst one but it used plastic guns with rubber bayonets. You could see them wobbling when they ran. Wolves of War is almost as bad. Every gun shot sounded suppressed. The Allied forces were using handguns for most of the fighting and could hit every shot. The Nazi's were using rifles and missed just about everything. There was not attempt at any realism in the fight scenes.
Now the acting. It was absolutely terrible. There is not much more I can say except I wish I never watched it. I turned it off with ten minutes to go and should have done it much sooner. Don't waste your time.
Now the acting. It was absolutely terrible. There is not much more I can say except I wish I never watched it. I turned it off with ten minutes to go and should have done it much sooner. Don't waste your time.
I love WWIi films but not this one. So bad in so many ways. Like a 1" thick wooden table could really serve as a shield against a machine gun. Like military men in that era turning their machine guns horizontally while firing or the two handed hold on a pistol grip? I don't think so. Or bombs being dropped and grenades exploding with nearly zero damage to soldiers going unscathed. So hard to watch this very misguided update to such small things that for me, made this film nearly unwatchable. Even though the the story was supposedly based on a true story, I didn't really care if the good guys finished their mission successfully or not. Total waste of time.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe truck used by the protagonists is an actual vintage truck of WWII Germany. On the rear panel of the truck are the white painted words, "Abstand 100M", which translates into, "Stay back 100 meters". This message is a legal requirement in modern Europe for slow moving vehicles, including historical vehicles, that have limited rear view.
- Erros de gravaçãoIn one scene, combatants are seen hiding behind a genuine German car called a "Kübelwagen". This vehicle is likened to a "mini-moke". It's panels are made of thin aluminium, and yet, somehow the bullets ricochet off the thin alunimium panels.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Wolves of War?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 13.625
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 27 min(87 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente