AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
2,3 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um misterioso assassinato ocorre durante uma disputada competição de cabeleireiros. Extravagância e excesso se chocam, enquanto a morte de um dos seus divide de forma violenta uma comunidade... Ler tudoUm misterioso assassinato ocorre durante uma disputada competição de cabeleireiros. Extravagância e excesso se chocam, enquanto a morte de um dos seus divide de forma violenta uma comunidade cuja paixão por cabelo beira a obsessão.Um misterioso assassinato ocorre durante uma disputada competição de cabeleireiros. Extravagância e excesso se chocam, enquanto a morte de um dos seus divide de forma violenta uma comunidade cuja paixão por cabelo beira a obsessão.
- Prêmios
- 2 vitórias e 8 indicações no total
Luca Pasqualino
- Angel
- (as Luke Pasqualino)
John Alan Roberts
- Mosca
- (as John Roberts)
Avaliações em destaque
The one-take movie is a fun concept. But the fact still remains that if the script isn't good, the concept isn't going to cover up that fact. This was actually the first one-take film I've seen that I haven't enjoyed. All the other ones have had a great script to back up the concept. On this occasion though I wonder if they were using it to mask the weakness of what they had to work with, rather than doing it for purely artistic reasons.
The first thing a film has to do is make you care, and this one never did. I never found a character I could relate to or even enjoy their presence on screen. And I was never given a reason to care about the murder-mystery. We never meet the person who is murdered or even see them murdered. We are just told and then expected to spend 90 minutes desperately wondering whodunnit. That's not possible to do.
A one-take whodunnit should have been an absolute dream film for me to enjoy, but if the execution isn't there then it doesn't matter. This one was sadly a big misfire for me. 3/10.
The first thing a film has to do is make you care, and this one never did. I never found a character I could relate to or even enjoy their presence on screen. And I was never given a reason to care about the murder-mystery. We never meet the person who is murdered or even see them murdered. We are just told and then expected to spend 90 minutes desperately wondering whodunnit. That's not possible to do.
A one-take whodunnit should have been an absolute dream film for me to enjoy, but if the execution isn't there then it doesn't matter. This one was sadly a big misfire for me. 3/10.
Medusa Deluxe directed by Thomas Hardiman, is a captivating film that seamlessly delivers a gripping cinematic experience.
The cinematography is mesmerizing, with each frame meticulously composed to evoke a sense of both awe and unease. Camera work is really impressive - you can really appreciate the tech side to the film
The score perfectly complements the visuals, further immersing the audience into the film's world.
Casting is put together really well throughout with talent that engages you throughout the film with they're interesting personas.
Would really recommend to check this out. The film has been released nationally in the UK.
The cinematography is mesmerizing, with each frame meticulously composed to evoke a sense of both awe and unease. Camera work is really impressive - you can really appreciate the tech side to the film
The score perfectly complements the visuals, further immersing the audience into the film's world.
Casting is put together really well throughout with talent that engages you throughout the film with they're interesting personas.
Would really recommend to check this out. The film has been released nationally in the UK.
The film, with its stunning long take, makes us feel as if we are walking alongside the characters, traversing various captivating settings and hypnotic scenes. Consequently, the beginning may appear bewildering and somewhat disorienting, as we adjust to the rapid influx of information: the breathtaking scenery, the characters' magnificent hair, their dialogues, understanding what is unfolding, among other aspects. Nevertheless, after this initial phase, we are thrust into the midst of a plot that consistently prompts us to question certainties, sow seeds of doubt, and introduce minor twists and turns. The film keeps us pondering all the time: "Where is this leading us?"
This sensation can also have a bittersweet taste, as some scenes appear shallow, lacking a proper conclusion. Regrettably, the conclusion of the story ends up being predictable and monotonous, which is disappointing. Furthermore, the decision to include a scene that seems to come out of a "scriptwriting manual," outside of the continuous shot, is debatable and should not have been included. This scene alters the perception of concepts that were subverted throughout the film, rendering them inconsistent with what had been built up until that point.
This sensation can also have a bittersweet taste, as some scenes appear shallow, lacking a proper conclusion. Regrettably, the conclusion of the story ends up being predictable and monotonous, which is disappointing. Furthermore, the decision to include a scene that seems to come out of a "scriptwriting manual," outside of the continuous shot, is debatable and should not have been included. This scene alters the perception of concepts that were subverted throughout the film, rendering them inconsistent with what had been built up until that point.
Murder at the hairdressing competition. It's like the title Agatha Cristie forgot to write. We don't get a Poirot however, just a bunch of unlikeable characters chattering away for 90 minutes. We don't get to meet the victim, he's already cold when the movie opens, nor do we geet to meet the detectives working the case. We"re stuck with the models and collegues of the victim. It's a directorial choice offcourse. Just as the fact that the whole movie is filmed (or appears to be filmed) in one take. Which means a director going on an egotrip and an audience that has to suffer through endless shots of people walking through corridors. As you can tell I wasn't particularly taken with Medusa Deluxe. When we finally get to know whodunnit I was long past caring.
I wanted to watch a comedy and this film was listed as a comedy. First off, I am not adverse to what is called "black/dark comedy". Not at all. In fact I found "A Clockwork Orange" to be rife with "black/dark comedy". Also, thoroughly enjoyed "Tucker and Dale vs Evil". All that said, this film should not be listed in any genre of comedy. I watched it 3/4 through and there was not even one scene of any comedic merit. Nothing. In addition, the acting was often very bad, the dialogue was often awful and the overall story-line was disjointed and confusing. Not to mention the endless and TEDIOUS filler scenes of people going up or down stairs and walking through hallways. If you are looking for a comedy, skip this slop.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesCleave (Clare Perkins) says that the elaborate Fontange hairstyle, incorporating a sailing ship, is based on 'Orient 1791'. Orient was the French flagship at The Battle of the Nile (1798)and was destroyed when her magazine caught fire and exploded during the battle.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosIn the end credits: "Dedicated to the hairdressers of the world"
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Medusa Deluxe?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Медуза делюкс
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 68.560
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 41 min(101 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.33 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente