AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,4/10
18 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um radialista recebe uma ligação ao vivo de um desconhecido que ameaça matar sua família. É aí que, para salvá-los, ele terá que participar de um jogo de sobrevivência para descobrir a ident... Ler tudoUm radialista recebe uma ligação ao vivo de um desconhecido que ameaça matar sua família. É aí que, para salvá-los, ele terá que participar de um jogo de sobrevivência para descobrir a identidade do criminoso.Um radialista recebe uma ligação ao vivo de um desconhecido que ameaça matar sua família. É aí que, para salvá-los, ele terá que participar de um jogo de sobrevivência para descobrir a identidade do criminoso.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Alia Seror-O'Neill
- Mary
- (as Alia Seror O'Neill)
Nadia Farès
- Sam
- (as Nadia Fares)
Hallie Paquin
- Adria (Voice)
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
I think the movie needed someone with a strong villain voice thats all .voices like keifer Sutherland (phone booth),James spader ( The blacklist) or maybe Michael Sheen (unthinkable). Besides that the movie was not bad at all .Mel Gibson played his part very good as a lead character.i mean its not a bad thing to select or give new coming actors and actresses a chance but sometimes its wise to select the best quality so that your movie can sell. I still have faith in you. I mean Quinton Tarantino invested/picked best characters in Django and took awards for that...I think you can also do better.
A little Die Hard, some The Game, and some good old Mel Gibson fun. While On the Line isn't the greatest movie, it held my interest with non-stop suspense. It is a real nail-biter until you realize what is really happening. Mel does a great job of playing Elvis the Talk-show host, and delivers a good believable portrayal of a man on the edge. The story gets moving very early on and builds to a crescendo that might be a bit too predictable. But still very entertaining. It's good to see Mel Gibson in a decent role again, and while this movie wasn't a Lethal Weapon or a Braveheart it was a pretty decent movie.
On the Line by Romuald Boulanger is a resourceful and well-acted Mel Gibson vehicle in which director smartly puts his star front and center for an hour and the half and charisma does the rest.
Mel Gibson's recent output - with the exception of extraordinary Father Stu - consists of so-called geezer teasers which featured him supporting roles simply distributed throughout the runtime in order to make him seem like an important character. However, unlike Bruce Willis whose late pre-retirement output was based around similar projects, Mel Gibson never phoned it in and always did his best even with low-grade material.
Thus giving Mel Gibson the actual spotlight and making the film that really relies on his star power in a leading role is a coup not just for this project but for Mel's fans as well. After a long while, maybe after Blood Father made by another Frenchman Jean-Francois Richet we see Mel actually running the proceedings with authority.
The first act of the picture feels not only genuinely inspired but loads of gallows humour and the genuine sense that Elvis Cooney is a real edgelord feels as if Mel was really hands on even when it comes to the script. In later developments which rely on the closed quarters thriller dynamics and feel slightly mechanical, Mel Gibson elevates the material.
Boulanger surrounds Gibson with an international cast with some great elements but their multiple accents do remind us that film is set in Los Angeles but shot in Paris. Maybe, some decisions could have been different when it comes to either setting or cast, but otherwise the production is resourceful and decently mounted.
In the end, the only element that could have been better is the thriller element. With more inventive set-up, something along the lines of good Blumhouse work and with Mel's performance which is already there this could have been a classic.
Anyhow it's a really good programmer with an inspired turn by Mel Gibson.
Mel Gibson's recent output - with the exception of extraordinary Father Stu - consists of so-called geezer teasers which featured him supporting roles simply distributed throughout the runtime in order to make him seem like an important character. However, unlike Bruce Willis whose late pre-retirement output was based around similar projects, Mel Gibson never phoned it in and always did his best even with low-grade material.
Thus giving Mel Gibson the actual spotlight and making the film that really relies on his star power in a leading role is a coup not just for this project but for Mel's fans as well. After a long while, maybe after Blood Father made by another Frenchman Jean-Francois Richet we see Mel actually running the proceedings with authority.
The first act of the picture feels not only genuinely inspired but loads of gallows humour and the genuine sense that Elvis Cooney is a real edgelord feels as if Mel was really hands on even when it comes to the script. In later developments which rely on the closed quarters thriller dynamics and feel slightly mechanical, Mel Gibson elevates the material.
Boulanger surrounds Gibson with an international cast with some great elements but their multiple accents do remind us that film is set in Los Angeles but shot in Paris. Maybe, some decisions could have been different when it comes to either setting or cast, but otherwise the production is resourceful and decently mounted.
In the end, the only element that could have been better is the thriller element. With more inventive set-up, something along the lines of good Blumhouse work and with Mel's performance which is already there this could have been a classic.
Anyhow it's a really good programmer with an inspired turn by Mel Gibson.
This starts off really well, a good premise and a slightly weird choice of opener. So far so good. Then it just descends into lazy writing. Bad performances from a good 50% of the ensemble and a totally lunatic ending which I won't spoil (if you get that far).
Mel Gibson has his detractors, and I get it, he's had a shocking personal life and expressed some vile views. It has to be said though, Mel is a good actor and knows his way around a scene. Without him I'm pretty certain I'd have made this a two star review. He brings a charisma and a suite of good choices for most of the movie, but by the third act - actually at the start of the second act even Mel can't keep up with hapless direction, the weird dialogue and the lack of any creative spark to cover up the deficiencies in the narrative. In many ways it passes the time, but can feel by the end a massive waste of time.
Mel Gibson has his detractors, and I get it, he's had a shocking personal life and expressed some vile views. It has to be said though, Mel is a good actor and knows his way around a scene. Without him I'm pretty certain I'd have made this a two star review. He brings a charisma and a suite of good choices for most of the movie, but by the third act - actually at the start of the second act even Mel can't keep up with hapless direction, the weird dialogue and the lack of any creative spark to cover up the deficiencies in the narrative. In many ways it passes the time, but can feel by the end a massive waste of time.
Very enjoyable entertainment, good twists and a fabulous Mel Gibson. No masterpiece but a nice flick!
Don't understand the bad reviews.
In my book it's all about managing expectations. If you choose a movie because the plot line interests you, you like the cast and you're in for a relaxing few hours in front of the telly then you're rarely disappointed.
Although if you are a movie Connaisseur or critic, you might want to apply different criteria to pick your movies to avoid disappointment.
In this case it did what it said on the tin and provided very enjoyable light entertainment, a good portion of suspense and a good ending.
Don't understand the bad reviews.
In my book it's all about managing expectations. If you choose a movie because the plot line interests you, you like the cast and you're in for a relaxing few hours in front of the telly then you're rarely disappointed.
Although if you are a movie Connaisseur or critic, you might want to apply different criteria to pick your movies to avoid disappointment.
In this case it did what it said on the tin and provided very enjoyable light entertainment, a good portion of suspense and a good ending.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesKevin Connolly was supposed to play Justin, but due to his first child arriving soon he recommended Kevin Dillon who got the role.
- Erros de gravação(at around 1h 3 mins) Right before Elvis finds Justin's body, a pair of reading glasses hang from his collar. A few shots later, they're gone.
- Citações
Elvis Cooney: What kind of a B grade movie is this?
- ConexõesReferenced in Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Qatar World Cup (2022)
- Trilhas sonorasCan't Stop
Written by Flea (as Michael Balzary), John Frusciante, Anthony Kiedis, Chad Smith
Performed by Red Hot Chili Peppers (uncredited)
©Universal Music Publishing on behalf of Moebetoblame Music
(P)2002 Warner Records Inc. for the U.S. and Wea International Inc. for the world outside of the U.S.
With the permission of Universal Music Publishing Film & TV & Warner Music France
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is On the Line?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- On the Line
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 112.081
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 44 min(104 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39:1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente