The Loch Ness Horror

What to say, this one is really bad.

The pacing is very slow and not by artistic design to build tension. The monster is pretty good. The logic of those on board is pathetic.

I think they bumped off the characters quickly to lighten the budget.

The monster is supposedly the Loch Ness monster. Loch being Scott's for lake, yet the story does not happen in the lake.

It is odd that the dialogue is not recorded well, so many conversations are hard to get the meaning.

Note to self, just because the advertising graphic looks slick and intriguing does not mean the movie is any good.

Plenty of other suspenseful movies go rewatch a good one, way better use if time that watching this one.

The movie doesn't take place in or around Loch Ness. It takes place in the North Atlantic somewhere. There is a distinct lack of terror or anything at all happening for much of the movie. The monster shows up now and then to eat someone. The acting is really quite bad even for a low budget horror movie. Almost the entire movie takes place on what I think is a cargo ship of some sort. It looks like a very old ship that was turned into a museum. They make sure you never see the side of the ship so it's probably at dock somewhere. There's also a very cheap submarine set. Asylum-grade monster movies love a cheap submarine set. I guess the CGI for the monster isn't terrible for the little screen time it gets. The movie also come with a small side of Alien for some reason.

This is just not very good. I have seen worse but this is just very mediocre and kind of boring for most of it.

I happened to stumble upon the 2023 movie "The Loch Ness Horror" by random luck here in 2023. And with it being a movie that I hadn't already seen, much less even heard about, of course I opted to sit down and watch it. I mean, this was a movie about the Loch Ness creature, after all.

Needless to say that I didn't venture into this with a whole lot of high expectations or grand hopes from writer and director Tyler-James. But still, I opted to watch the movie with an open mind and give the writer and director the benefit of the doubt.

The storyline in "The Loch Ness Horror" was pretty generic for a movie such as this. If you have watched any other type of movie with an aquatic monstrous creature of any sort, then you know what you are in for when you sit down to watch this movie. So writer Tyler-James didn't deliver anything particularly impressive with the script and storyline here.

I found out that there is actually a movie from 1982 also titled "The Loch Ness Horror". But as I haven't seen that one, I have no idea whether or not this 2023 movie from writer and director Tyler-James is a remake of that older movie or not.

The acting performances in "The Loch Ness Horror" were fair enough. It was an all unfamiliar cast ensemble to me, and that is something I actually enjoy when I sit down to watch a movie. However, there weren't any impressive or outstanding performances to write home about, though.

The CGI effects in the movie were fair enough. It wasn't top of the line impressive CGI effects, but for a movie such as "The Loch Ness Horror" turned out to be, then I will say that the effects were actually adequate enough.

Watchable for what it was, the 2023 movie "The Loch Ness Horror" wasn't exactly impressive or outstanding. It is not a movie that warrants more than just a single viewing. Nor is it a movie that I would recommend creature feature fans to rush out and get to watch.

My rating of "The Loch Ness Horror", from writer and director Tyler-James, lands on a generous four out of ten stars.

Bad mix of Loch Ness monster and Alien movie! The "story" involves a rescue team attempting to locate a missing submarine in the Atlantic Ocean, only to discover the Loch Ness monster is responsible for the disappearance. Part of the crew are thugs who take the others hostage, however, an alien-like creature mysteriously emerges from one of the thugs, and results in the hostages running around the sub trying to survive. One of the female characters says it best when she askes,"What is the point of all this?" In the end, this was just another low budget, beyond ridiculous monster movie with no redeeming qualities. At least the 1982 version had a cheesy, "so bad, it's good" kind of charm, however, this was just so bad it's unwatchable. Don't waste your time!!!!!!! As a result of utter embarrassment, I don't believe any of the actors were ever heard from again.......

I don't think I can stress enough how bad this film is, the acting is bad, the script is bad, the direction is bad, the sets are bad, the effects are bad, the plot is bad. So much of this film just doesn't make sense.

I watched this on Prime video, the picture showed 4 star reviews from a site called 'Creature Feature', not only can I not find this online the quote suggests "Shades of THE MEG, ALIEN and GODZILLA"... WHERE???

The Meg because it's set at sea, maybe, alien because after the monster spits something on one of the characters some kind of bug explodes from his chest and Godzilla because, why not.

At one point one of the actors tries to act with just his facial expressions, he does not succeed. I couldn't work out if he was confused, befuddled, contemplative or just trying to hold in a massive fart.

DO. NOT. WATCH.