AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,3/10
1,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
A pedido de seu pai, o jovem D'Artagnan viaja do interior da Gasconha para Paris, onde se envolve em um enredo desonesto entre os mosqueteiros do rei e os guardas do Cardeal Richelieu.A pedido de seu pai, o jovem D'Artagnan viaja do interior da Gasconha para Paris, onde se envolve em um enredo desonesto entre os mosqueteiros do rei e os guardas do Cardeal Richelieu.A pedido de seu pai, o jovem D'Artagnan viaja do interior da Gasconha para Paris, onde se envolve em um enredo desonesto entre os mosqueteiros do rei e os guardas do Cardeal Richelieu.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Mollie Hindle-Pérez
- Milady
- (as Mollie Hindle)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
This movie promised so much but ultimately disappoints.
Very poorly choreographed fight scenes. Bad direction. Average acting.
Its a very slow film that doesn't actually go anywhere. It is nowhere near as good as any single episode of the TV show from 2014 to 2016. These were very well written and directed and had top quality fight scenes. Obviously the director of this movie did no research before creating this mess!
What a waste of a budget and my time!
Very poorly choreographed fight scenes. Bad direction. Average acting.
Its a very slow film that doesn't actually go anywhere. It is nowhere near as good as any single episode of the TV show from 2014 to 2016. These were very well written and directed and had top quality fight scenes. Obviously the director of this movie did no research before creating this mess!
What a waste of a budget and my time!
I watched this because the high rating but quickly found it was a stacked deck. They used every trick in the book to make it look bigger, such as using artistic drawings for the cut scenes, but I still think they made the complete movie with just 4 sets. It doesn't matter because the acting matched the sets, small and uninspired. Finally, the script. It was horrible, just horrible. Do not watch this, ever, find an old movie and be happy.
Production companies are constantly racking their brains as to what they can offer the viewer any time soon. In itself, this is not a problem, I think, as a European who sees high quality in American film. And that is in the convincing scenes of really good actors and, of course, the set design, that is, the scenery itself. They are always realistic portrayals.
Unfortunately, this does not always apply to the genre and the storytelling. Themes like the musketeers were transported very well many years ago. A remake like this is basically an insult. Because one believes to bring the spirit of the times into the given modernity. Which can succeed, if it is transposed to sci-fi level, for example. Light sabers and light swords are not an invention of George Lukas, they existed in comics decades before. That's what someone like me would like to see. The four musketeers in the year 2500.
This movie is not worth the production costs.
Unfortunately, this does not always apply to the genre and the storytelling. Themes like the musketeers were transported very well many years ago. A remake like this is basically an insult. Because one believes to bring the spirit of the times into the given modernity. Which can succeed, if it is transposed to sci-fi level, for example. Light sabers and light swords are not an invention of George Lukas, they existed in comics decades before. That's what someone like me would like to see. The four musketeers in the year 2500.
This movie is not worth the production costs.
This movie was odd and disappointing for me, having grown up watching one treatment after another of Dumas classic tale, done with acting, action, and a PLOT. This 2022 adaptation couldn't seem to get off home plate. There are FAR too many d'Artagnans for one thing. We're told d'Artagnan (the "main" one) has practiced with the toy sword his whole life, but all we see is him whacking lamely at a grain sack.
The cast is small for a theme usually swarming with cast and extras. The scenes are all shot in close narrow angle which is quickly distracting. The "main" d'Artagnan serves 2 years in the academy (we assume) but returns to his father clearly not a day older when any young man of 18 would change quite a lot in two years -- even a High School production would exploit this easy opportunity to reinforce the idea of time and character development!
I can say, the costumes were not bad, and I didn't notice any jet aircraft or automobiles, but I can't think of any reason I'd recommend this to anyone.
The cast is small for a theme usually swarming with cast and extras. The scenes are all shot in close narrow angle which is quickly distracting. The "main" d'Artagnan serves 2 years in the academy (we assume) but returns to his father clearly not a day older when any young man of 18 would change quite a lot in two years -- even a High School production would exploit this easy opportunity to reinforce the idea of time and character development!
I can say, the costumes were not bad, and I didn't notice any jet aircraft or automobiles, but I can't think of any reason I'd recommend this to anyone.
Not badly done for a low budget movie but nothing exciting. I would expect more from an action movie and from the story, which was also fine but simplistic. Not recommended.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen D'Artagnan journeys to Paris in 1625, an illustration of Paris is shown that includes the Porte Saint-Denis triumphal arch. The arch shown in the drawing wasn't built until 1672.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Fourth Musketeer?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 25 min(85 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente