2000 Mules

This entire wad is a chimera - a fantasy built to confirm your belief that Trump was cheated. At last you know how "they" did it! The fact that every single thing here is a lie or a deception won't matter.

For instance, all the video of "mules" at drop-boxes. D'Souza claims he has 1000 HOURS of this, but all we see are three or four clips of people dropping off a ballot. These are run repeatedly from different angles so the narrators can fantasize about what the "mules" must have been thinking. One person takes a selfie; from that comes the theory that pictures were demanded by mules paymasters. Another wears gloves; which is obviously to avoid fingerprints. She tosses those in the trash; clearly as instructed to do. Onlookers do nothing; certainly because they are too shocked to react. Etc.

In all those 1000 hours D'Souza has NONE that shows a person going to more than one box. Which is THE HEART of his mules theory, of course. So he FAKED those scenes with the actor Jacob Hyman, not listed in the film's main credits. And in all that video he has only one person dropping off several ballots. He calls this poor man a "criminal"; but it turns out that the ballots were his family's so perfectly legal. No apology from D'Souza - but he is being sued.

Then there's the cellphone data, which according to Gregg Phillips exactly confirm the theory of mules gathering ballots at non-profit organizations and distributing them around the city. The fact that locating someone AT a dropbox is impossible means nothing. And of course that data won't be released and the analyses can't be verified. And Gregg is responsible for the enormous lie that millions of illegals voted in 2016. His word here is equally worthless. And btw CRUCIAL to the film's claims.

Then there's the "non-profits" such as nursing homes, shelters, community centers, 4H homes etc. Thousands of staff there apparently coerced or tricked hundreds of thousands of residents to vote for Biden, then fed these ballots into the mules system. Strangely, none of these people or their victims or the mules have come forward or been found in all this time.

D'Souza doesn't leave it at tha. Every line of the script and every reaction is crafted to further the deception. And being professional work is very persuasive... especially to those who want desperately to believe. So we see people claiming that it's "irrefutable evidence of massive fraud".

A chimera - created from nothing but tearing our nation apart. That's the real crime here.

The information presented in this film is most likely not supporting the claim of wide spread election fraud. Several aspects may not be false/fake but are interpreted in an incorrect manner. It may be true that someone visits locations of ballet boxes multiple times or drops several ballets at once. It does not prove election fraud (see available fact checking) the data has simply been (ab)used to build a conspiracy.

Trumpers love to call baseless claims of election fraud "irrefutable". The less basis, the more irrefutable. You see the same here. Out of his ballyhooed 4 million minutes of dropbox video, D'Souza only shows a few single people dropping single ballots into a single box. Except for one person - more on him below.

So he chose several clips which could be handwaved into looking "suspicious" and the cast tries desperately to do that.

-- A couple folks bring only one ballot but have to deal with one that falls out of the box... so these are spoken of as having brought several.

-- Kinda shaky so "let's look at another mule"... This one tosses her gloves in the trash BUT doesn't first look around for the bin. So she's obviously a hardened criminal who had cased the joint earlier and slyly planned her (single) ballot drop far in advance... unaware that she could simply have mailed it in to avoid the video cameras.

-- When government workers empty the box we are told sadly "Look at that... so many ballots" - as if they're all somehow fake!

The deception and absurdity abounds. The ONLY video D'Souza has of someone dropping off more than one ballot is a man legally bringing in all of them for his family. D'Souza tells us that we are watching a crime in progress and that those are "fraudulent ballots". A total lie.

Not having ANY videos of multiple ballots dropped at multiple boxes, D'Souza has an actor do that! Complete with hoodie and frightened expression, and spilling "ballots" out of his backpack as he "stuffs" them into boxes. So we'll be sure to get the idea.

Having all this irrefutable (baseless) evidence of mulery, D'Souza simply multiplies the mules we (didn't) see by the number of ballots they (weren't) carrying and the number of boxes they (didn't) go to, and finds there were hundreds of thousands!

He has to invent a source for all of these: non-profit community shelters and 4H homes bamboozling hundreds of thousands of their residents!

Nothing is too spectacularly absurd for him to say. He "proves" this by claiming that cellphone data has shown that thousands of people (the mules, remember) not only were near those places but also went near a dropbox! Of course nobody can see his analysis... just take his word for it.

All this irrefutable evidence is the more irrefutable because it rests on the word of a convicted election campaign fraud felon: D'Souza. Whom Donald Trump pardoned btw.

So as promised: irrefutably irrefutable. Deny that, you deniers! America, we have a problem!

(🔹) His cellphone data source "True The Vote" only claims 100 ft accuracy. (🔹) It can't be better than 16' best case. (🔹) He won't let anyone review that work. (🔹) It didn't "solve a murder". (🔹) Any fake ballots "stuffed" in boxes won't be counted anyway. (🔹) Valid ballots can be dropped in a mailbox.(🔹) He has no real videos of putting multiple ballots in a box. (🔹) So he staged the scenes of a "mule" with piles of ballots. (🔹) And the scenes of them going to more than one box. (🔹) Mocked up with an extra-wide mouth for effect. (🔹) Ballot transport aka "harvesting" for family is legal except in AL. (🔹) Which is why you see folks with more than one. (🔹) Which he just repeats. (🔹) And until recently was unrestricted in Az. (🔹) So the undated report of it in Yuma means nothing. (🔹) Nobody has found fake ballots anywhere. (🔹) Not one of thousands of "mules" and "healthcare workers" has been found and (🔹) Obviously couldn't be paid off forever. (🔹) The Az Audit hand-counted 2 million ballots and matched them to the databases and found nothing.

(🔹) D'Souza omits that he is a convicted campaign law felon (!) pardoned by Trump... (🔹) and that the Russians helped make this film, leaving in a map of Moscow.

(🔹) BUT HE DOES TRUTHFULLY SAY in his Washington Post interview that his "evidence" wouldn't begin to stand up in court. Meaning... it's WORTHLESS. And points that this is just "a movie" after all. So there's that.

So what are they telling us? The Arizona woman doesn't actually say that anything criminal happened. Ballot transport there was legal until recently and no dates are mentioned, go figure. The camera videos are nothing even though the speaker says it's all suspicious. He says the geo tracking is suspicious too but they never follow up with anybody real. Just suspicion, suspicion, suspicion without proof. And lots of drama acting. What they said about them solving murders turns out to be a lie. I think it's all a lie.