Slutet på sommaren

This Swedish drama opens in the summer of 1984 as young Vera witnesses her mother committing suicide by jumping into a lake. Twenty years later Vera is working as a grief councillor. A man, identifying himself as Isak talks about how he recently learnt that he was adopted; one of his only early memories concerns the disappearance of a childhood friend. Vera starts to wonder if Isak could in fact be her young brother Billy who vanished shortly before her mother's death. Returning to her rural home town with Isak she tries to discover what happened to her brother. Everybody seems to think local ne'er-do-well Tommy killed him before disappearing himself but is it that simple?

I thought this was a really solid series. There was a good sense of mystery and an impressive '80s feel to the numerous extended flashback scenes. The truth is gradually revealed and doesn't become guessable until it is almost time for the reveal; and even then it is a case of 'I think this might have happened' rather than certainty. The cast impresses, most obviously Julia Ragnarsson who does a fine job as Vera. Six episodes in length it doesn't feel rushed, nor does it ever drag. The setting is great; the flashback scenes beautifully captured the languid feel of childhood summers years ago. Overall I'd certainly recommend this to fans of Scandinavian drama.

Swedish with English subtitles on BBC4.

6 Episodes, just the right amount.

Refreshingly, no Woke storylines or references.

I enjoyed this drama. It kept to the main storyline with no padding subplots.

Yes, there were some flaws, but most dramas suffer in the same way these days.

The one criticism is the overplaying of Harald's character. It was made quite evident throughout that he was complicit in some way, and the way he was allowed to have access to the police investigation and most other things was irritating.

There were no real surprises at the end. My wife and I had worked out after episode three roughly what happened to Billy and Tommy.

Another drama where justice is not seen to be done and lone females going into derelict buildings.

Spookily, Julia Ragnarsson (Vera) is a dead ringer for somebody we know. It was uncanny.

Ida Gyllensten (Magdalena) looks a lot like UK actress Anna Friel. They could easily play sisters.

Ragnarsson was a great anchor for the whole season . Remember her original showing in the stellar " THE BRIDGE " ? It's disturbing in the sense that , there are several , interconnected strands that all contribute to the end game , within a relatively small community, over two generations . It begs the question , is this what rural living is actually like in Scandinavian culture ? Several Scandi Noir series have covered similar ground , or is it that original storylines are simply plagiarised infinitely ? There are a few characters within the plot that are superfluous and unnecessary which slows it down somewhat . Some of the hints are a touch strong , but ultimately the denouement is excellent. However , there is a rather glaring open end which can , in no way , be justification for a second series ?

Intially promising, good plot and well known actors. But unfortunately this production failed miserably. What exactly is wrong you might ask? It's a combination of several factors according to my opinion Firstly the character build up is not done right. The story it self is either unfolding too fast or too slow. The different scenes dont follow each other in a smooth way. They are kind of disconnected. Some of the supporting scenes that should tell a story behind each character are sometimes unnecessary or don't really make sense to the audience.

Main thing lacking is that this show fails in building up a suspense. I quickly became uninterested in what happens and didn't know what or who I was rooting for.

The acting is overall good, so is the script and how it's executed.

My guess to why it fails is the pre planning of this production, what scenes to shoot to tell the story and how to build suspense. Could the team be more used to typical drama and not crime/who dunit?

I really enjoyed this. But that's not to say that I found it full of credibility. That a disbarred professional fighting to get her job back would do what Vera does is a step too far, especially in front of witnesses.

That apart, I enjoyed the present day and flashback format of the series. The person playing young Vera was excellent too.

The actor playing the putative adult Billy was less convincing although I'm going to put this down to bad directing. From episode five onwards, he'd obviously been told to look menacing and he did this by baring his teeth when smiling. It didn't work.

I didn't guess what had happened to Billy but I had realised what Tommy's fate was and who the perpetrator must have been.

In a highly regulated state like Sweden, it seemed odd to me how people's identities couldn't be established. Even odder, why not demand a DNA test immediately instead of acting on supposition and intuition?

I'm glad I saw this and it filled a few hours. It made my brain work and surprised me too.

Recommended.