Dois irmãos acordam no meio da noite e descobrem que seu pai sumiu e todas as portas e janelas de sua casa desapareceram. E, para piorar, eles não estão sozinhos.Dois irmãos acordam no meio da noite e descobrem que seu pai sumiu e todas as portas e janelas de sua casa desapareceram. E, para piorar, eles não estão sozinhos.Dois irmãos acordam no meio da noite e descobrem que seu pai sumiu e todas as portas e janelas de sua casa desapareceram. E, para piorar, eles não estão sozinhos.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 5 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
Although the title of this review may appear unkind, it is nevertheless, apt.
I really wanted to like this film but ended up bored and angry. Angry that the filmmaker had been so self-indulgent as to presume the audience would be able to withstand 100 minutes of this punishment.
I admire what he did, the execution is excellent and I was immediately drawn into the atmosphere that the film exudes. However, as other reviewers have noted, this would have made a decent short film, maybe 20 minutes. As it stands, it overplays it's hand dramatically and had me begging to be relinquished from the monotony of the long takes which comprise the film's bloated runtime.
My hope is that Shudder cuts it down significantly before it has an official on-line release. It's too bad. It really does tap into something visceral and primal.
I really wanted to like this film but ended up bored and angry. Angry that the filmmaker had been so self-indulgent as to presume the audience would be able to withstand 100 minutes of this punishment.
I admire what he did, the execution is excellent and I was immediately drawn into the atmosphere that the film exudes. However, as other reviewers have noted, this would have made a decent short film, maybe 20 minutes. As it stands, it overplays it's hand dramatically and had me begging to be relinquished from the monotony of the long takes which comprise the film's bloated runtime.
My hope is that Shudder cuts it down significantly before it has an official on-line release. It's too bad. It really does tap into something visceral and primal.
But there's also over an hour of sleep-inducing dead air that does nothing to increase tension or atmosphere, at least for me. I am someone who enjoys a slow burn, but even I have my limits. I watched it at night to get into the horror atmosphere and I struggled not to fall asleep throughout the whole thing.
It's a shame, because if you cut out most of that dead air there are moments of pure horror that genuinely freaked me out. Hopefully someone will do a fan edit and cut out over an hour of weird camera angles and the sound of old cartoons playing in the distance because my god there's only so much I could handle...
It's a shame, because if you cut out most of that dead air there are moments of pure horror that genuinely freaked me out. Hopefully someone will do a fan edit and cut out over an hour of weird camera angles and the sound of old cartoons playing in the distance because my god there's only so much I could handle...
I went into this movie completely blind (as I try to do with most movies) and can say without question this is NOT a movie you want to go in blind. This movie is extremely experimental and abstract and will not be to most people's taste. The entire film is shot with a grainy vhs type look and is comprised of deliberately off center shots of the interior of a house. There is virtually no plot to speak of and most of the 1 hour 40 minute runtime is composed of random shots.
I love films that challenge and are demanding to the viewer. I love independent cinema and slow burn films. But this film expects WAY too much from the viewer and becomes very irritating as a result. Even to the hardened art house viewer this movie expects too much. This would have made a brilliant 40 minute short as there are moments of true horror but they are surrounded by random repetitive imagery. At no point does this movie pick up pace or have any sort of narrative.
This movie feels like a nightmare ASMR or a full length creepy pasta. If you suffered from night terrors or sleep paralysis or experienced childhood trauma I think you could become extremely invested in this film and that is the only way this works. I didn't feel connected or engaged in the story (I've never been through any of the above) and the only film I can compare with regards to the pacing and somnolent effect this movie had is "Beyond the Black Rainbow".
Five points for originality.
I love films that challenge and are demanding to the viewer. I love independent cinema and slow burn films. But this film expects WAY too much from the viewer and becomes very irritating as a result. Even to the hardened art house viewer this movie expects too much. This would have made a brilliant 40 minute short as there are moments of true horror but they are surrounded by random repetitive imagery. At no point does this movie pick up pace or have any sort of narrative.
This movie feels like a nightmare ASMR or a full length creepy pasta. If you suffered from night terrors or sleep paralysis or experienced childhood trauma I think you could become extremely invested in this film and that is the only way this works. I didn't feel connected or engaged in the story (I've never been through any of the above) and the only film I can compare with regards to the pacing and somnolent effect this movie had is "Beyond the Black Rainbow".
Five points for originality.
All the people saying this film is plotless are wrong. There is a plot here, although it is extemely vague and thin. Might be one of the thinnest plotlines I've ever seen and that is what caused the film to be at times unbearably boring for me. I actually enjoyed the aesthetic for the film, the faceless characters, the low light, lofi camera work. It's a style that could present a high creep factor with the proper story to go along with it. This is not that story.
I will say this is much better than the director's previous effort 'Heck', which is basically the short film that started this one. It feels like the director has a better grip on the style he's presenting here. That still doesn't make up for the lack of story here.
The film opens with one of the children falling down the stairs and this starts the chain of events that make me believe the child actually died when this happened and he is living in some purgatory or hell. What follows after this could only be described as mean spirited and harsh, but it unfolds so slowly that you feel like you're just watching paint dry. There are some suitably creepy moments but they are few and far between. Actually there is maybe about 3 or 4 creepy scenes in the entire film, the ending being far and wide the most uncomfortable. Had me looking over my shoulder as I was leaving the theater.(I had the whole theater to myself, I'm assuming due to bad weather, but it was probably the best way to watch this film as isolation is a major theme.) The ending felt like I was being personally talked to by the faceless, out of focus boy and I hated it, but in a good way.
All in all, I still couldn't call this a good movie and it will only appeal to a very niche horror crowd. I commend the director for creating something so different. I just wish there was as much thought put into the story as there was in the shooting style.
2 portals out of 5.
I will say this is much better than the director's previous effort 'Heck', which is basically the short film that started this one. It feels like the director has a better grip on the style he's presenting here. That still doesn't make up for the lack of story here.
The film opens with one of the children falling down the stairs and this starts the chain of events that make me believe the child actually died when this happened and he is living in some purgatory or hell. What follows after this could only be described as mean spirited and harsh, but it unfolds so slowly that you feel like you're just watching paint dry. There are some suitably creepy moments but they are few and far between. Actually there is maybe about 3 or 4 creepy scenes in the entire film, the ending being far and wide the most uncomfortable. Had me looking over my shoulder as I was leaving the theater.(I had the whole theater to myself, I'm assuming due to bad weather, but it was probably the best way to watch this film as isolation is a major theme.) The ending felt like I was being personally talked to by the faceless, out of focus boy and I hated it, but in a good way.
All in all, I still couldn't call this a good movie and it will only appeal to a very niche horror crowd. I commend the director for creating something so different. I just wish there was as much thought put into the story as there was in the shooting style.
2 portals out of 5.
"Skinamarink" (2022) is a unique and unsettling horror film directed by Kyle Edward Ball. The film revolves around two young siblings, Kevin and Kaylee, who wake up one night to discover that their parents are missing and all the windows and doors in their house have mysteriously vanished. As they navigate this eerie situation, they are haunted by a strange voice that becomes increasingly sinister, leading them into a nightmare that challenges their perception of reality.
The film is heavily influenced by childhood fears and nightmares, with Ball drawing inspiration from recurring nightmares shared on his YouTube channel. The narrative is minimalist, focusing on atmosphere and psychological terror rather than traditional horror elements like gore or fast-paced action. The grainy, indistinct visuals and the slow-burn tension create an experience that is more about evoking a primal sense of dread than delivering straightforward scares.
"Skinamarink" has been described as a "microbudget cult movie" that has gained significant attention on social media platforms like TikTok, where its haunting imagery and cryptic plot have sparked widespread discussion and speculation. The film's ambiguous nature allows for various interpretations, especially concerning the strange voice that haunts the children and the mysterious ending that leaves viewers with more questions than answers.
Despite its unconventional approach, "Skinamarink" has been praised for its originality and its ability to tap into deep-seated fears, making it a standout in the horror genre. It's particularly recommended for fans of psychological horror who appreciate films that linger in the mind long after the credits roll.
The movie premiered at the Fantasia Film Festival in 2022 and later became available for streaming on Shudder in 2023.
The film is heavily influenced by childhood fears and nightmares, with Ball drawing inspiration from recurring nightmares shared on his YouTube channel. The narrative is minimalist, focusing on atmosphere and psychological terror rather than traditional horror elements like gore or fast-paced action. The grainy, indistinct visuals and the slow-burn tension create an experience that is more about evoking a primal sense of dread than delivering straightforward scares.
"Skinamarink" has been described as a "microbudget cult movie" that has gained significant attention on social media platforms like TikTok, where its haunting imagery and cryptic plot have sparked widespread discussion and speculation. The film's ambiguous nature allows for various interpretations, especially concerning the strange voice that haunts the children and the mysterious ending that leaves viewers with more questions than answers.
Despite its unconventional approach, "Skinamarink" has been praised for its originality and its ability to tap into deep-seated fears, making it a standout in the horror genre. It's particularly recommended for fans of psychological horror who appreciate films that linger in the mind long after the credits roll.
The movie premiered at the Fantasia Film Festival in 2022 and later became available for streaming on Shudder in 2023.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIn an interview, Kyle Edward Ball stated that he spelled the movie's name slightly differently than the song the movie is named after so kids wouldn't accidentally find his movie when searching for the song.
- Erros de gravaçãoDespite the movie taking place in 1995, the orange LEGO brick separator is shown in some shots, which was not introduced until 2011.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe makers of this picture would like to express their sincerest gratitude to the family of Joshua Bookhalter. Without their kindness and understanding, this picture would not have been completed.
- ConexõesFeatured in Movie Reviews: Skinamarink (2023)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Skinamarink?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Skinamarink
- Locações de filme
- Edmonton, Londres, Canadá(Main House)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- CA$ 15.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 2.052.272
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 818.943
- 15 de jan. de 2023
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 2.116.254
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Hindi language plot outline for Skinamarink - Canção de Ninar (2022)?
Responda