Na Veneza pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial, Poirot, agora aposentado e vivendo em seu próprio exílio, relutantemente vai a uma sessão espírita. Mas quando um dos convidados é assassinado, cabe ao ... Ler tudoNa Veneza pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial, Poirot, agora aposentado e vivendo em seu próprio exílio, relutantemente vai a uma sessão espírita. Mas quando um dos convidados é assassinado, cabe ao ex-detetive descobrir mais uma vez o assassino.Na Veneza pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial, Poirot, agora aposentado e vivendo em seu próprio exílio, relutantemente vai a uma sessão espírita. Mas quando um dos convidados é assassinado, cabe ao ex-detetive descobrir mais uma vez o assassino.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 6 vitórias e 4 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
A Haunting in Venice is the best of Kenneth Branagh's trilogy of Poirot adventures. This one being a smaller scale whodunit with a supernatural edge fixes any remaining issues whilst still being an engaging mystery with a satisfying answer to whodunit.
Kenneth Branagh is still endlessly entertaining as Hercule Poirot, the humour is toned down here due to the darker story and yet again he's grown as a character by the end. Each one has tested something different, first it was his morality then his humanity and here it's his sanity that is pushed to breaking point.
The cast is still undeniably star studded but still smaller than the predecessor which means no one goes unnoticed. Highlights include Tina Fey who makes for a great double act with Branagh's Poirot and Michelle Yeoh, given her best role in a Western film in ages (excluding EEAAO of course).
Mostly being confined to one smaller, interior heavy location, Branagh's direction is even better that what's come before. His trademark canted angles have never been more at home and even though the film isn't massively scary, Branagh is still able to craft some effectively uncomfortable moments.
Thanks to the location this franchise is finally free of the distracting CG that's been its biggest flaw. Being majority practical just makes the whole thing infinitely more immersive and means the stylish visual composition on display isn't having to make up for shoddy effects.
Kenneth Branagh is still endlessly entertaining as Hercule Poirot, the humour is toned down here due to the darker story and yet again he's grown as a character by the end. Each one has tested something different, first it was his morality then his humanity and here it's his sanity that is pushed to breaking point.
The cast is still undeniably star studded but still smaller than the predecessor which means no one goes unnoticed. Highlights include Tina Fey who makes for a great double act with Branagh's Poirot and Michelle Yeoh, given her best role in a Western film in ages (excluding EEAAO of course).
Mostly being confined to one smaller, interior heavy location, Branagh's direction is even better that what's come before. His trademark canted angles have never been more at home and even though the film isn't massively scary, Branagh is still able to craft some effectively uncomfortable moments.
Thanks to the location this franchise is finally free of the distracting CG that's been its biggest flaw. Being majority practical just makes the whole thing infinitely more immersive and means the stylish visual composition on display isn't having to make up for shoddy effects.
This is an interesting film if you're not an Agatha Christie & Hercule Poirot fan. But for me it completely lacked the unique charm of Poirot, his methods and his personality. KB is a great actor but in this film he is as far from being Poirot as can be. Maybe that was intentional but for me it just didn't work. Tina Fey was a nice surprise although my image of Ariadne Oliver was quite different. The pace of the action is not at all balanced and is difficult to follow. It is not bad film, I would definitely recommend it instead of hundreds others but it doesn't do justice to Agatha Christie's marvellous writing.
The change of setting to Venice is inspired, it gives it an otherworldly and insular, claustrophobic tone, which is emphasised by the camera work, and lighting, this one is tricky to review without spoilers so I must be brief, and leave some ideas out, the script is close to superb, but it just hits a couple of bum notes, the third act is over too soon, the denouement rushed, but in part it's because the mystery for all the effort and effects isn't that mysterious, but fundamentally the problem is Branagh, he obviously wants to be Poirot, but he isn't, he just isn't idiosyncratic enough, or dare I say talented enough, and he pales in comparison to the giant magnificent performances that have been before, the genius of Peter Ustinov only surpassed by the subtlety and diligence and sheer depth of David Suchet, one of the greatest acting performances ever, unfortunately for Branagh it's a tough school, and he just doesn't make the grade, gave it a 7, felt like an 8, but also a 6 coz of KBs love letter to himself.
This is my first foray into these Branagh Poirots having grown up with David Suchet on TV as him, so he had some big little Belgian shoes to fill.
Branagh brings enough intrigue and quirkiness to the character to make him his own, but in this film he is massively lost in the shadows of Tina Fey whose very presence steals any scene.
Whilst I didn't know the story/plot, it kept me guessing throughout, but some poorly executed shots and weak CGI moments gave the film an element of cheap horror film, and this jarred with the characters.
Yeoh's character was all too brief in her screen time, but she gave a great performance all the same. The main child actor - Jude Hill gives us a wonderfully intense, matter-of-fact, and sinisterly creepy Leopold. I hope to spot Jude flexing this skill in more films in future.
Wouldn't watch again, and likely wouldn't have gone to see it in the cinema if it wasn't because of friends wanting to watch it.
Branagh brings enough intrigue and quirkiness to the character to make him his own, but in this film he is massively lost in the shadows of Tina Fey whose very presence steals any scene.
Whilst I didn't know the story/plot, it kept me guessing throughout, but some poorly executed shots and weak CGI moments gave the film an element of cheap horror film, and this jarred with the characters.
Yeoh's character was all too brief in her screen time, but she gave a great performance all the same. The main child actor - Jude Hill gives us a wonderfully intense, matter-of-fact, and sinisterly creepy Leopold. I hope to spot Jude flexing this skill in more films in future.
Wouldn't watch again, and likely wouldn't have gone to see it in the cinema if it wasn't because of friends wanting to watch it.
This was surprisingly spookier than I thought it would be but it was happily welcomed during this Halloween Season. It was spooky without being cheesy or goofy which is what a lot of traditional horror movies tend to lean towards. I saw it in theaters but can definitely see myself cuddling up on the couch with a hot chocolate and a blanket to watch this film in the autumn.
You can tell Tina Fey isn't used to playing more serious roles but she pulled it off enough. It was definitely a surprise to see her in this film, especially as such a large character.
I would love to see more Poirot in the future as Kenneth Branagh does a great job portraying him.
This film was a good length too. Not too long and not too short.
I'd recommend this to those who enjoy a little spook and mystery but not for anyone looking for light hearted Halloween fun.
You can tell Tina Fey isn't used to playing more serious roles but she pulled it off enough. It was definitely a surprise to see her in this film, especially as such a large character.
I would love to see more Poirot in the future as Kenneth Branagh does a great job portraying him.
This film was a good length too. Not too long and not too short.
I'd recommend this to those who enjoy a little spook and mystery but not for anyone looking for light hearted Halloween fun.
All About 'A Haunting in Venice'
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe screenplay is inspired by Dame Agatha Christie's 1969 novel "Hallowe'en Party," with the setting changed from the UK to Venice, Italy. This is not the first time that Hallowe'en Party was adapted to film. In July of 2011, ITV Studios and WGBH released an 89-minute feature length film adaptation, Hallowe'en Party (2010), starring David Suchet as Poirot.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe statue's hand upon which Ms. Reynolds is impaled should be covered with blood and gore, yet it is clean.
- Citações
Ariadne Oliver: Scary stories make real life a little less scary
- ConexõesFeatured in The 7PM Project: Episode dated 22 September 2023 (2023)
- Trilhas sonorasWhen the Lights Go on Again
Written by Bennie Benjamin, Sol Marcus and Eddie Seiler
Performed by Vera Lynn
Courtesy of Decca Music Group Limited
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is A Haunting in Venice?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Cacería En Venecia
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 60.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 42.471.412
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 14.279.529
- 17 de set. de 2023
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 122.290.456
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 43 min(103 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente