Uma mulher que dirige o restaurante de sua família recebe um convite para se juntar à indústria de restaurantes finos sob a tutela de um chef infame.Uma mulher que dirige o restaurante de sua família recebe um convite para se juntar à indústria de restaurantes finos sob a tutela de um chef infame.Uma mulher que dirige o restaurante de sua família recebe um convite para se juntar à indústria de restaurantes finos sob a tutela de um chef infame.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória no total
Emilio Ferreira
- Au
- (narração)
Alex Gravenstein
- Tone
- (English version)
- (narração)
Chimwemwe Miller
- Paul
- (English version)
- (narração)
Avaliações em destaque
This is a film of two halves - unfortunately, these two halves belong in different movies.
The first half has the tone and feel of scabrous satire, clearly wanting to deliver social commentary. Here we are skirting really, really close to the same territory explored by The Menu. The second half discards this and, instead, mimics the dynamic and arc of Wall Street - only with restauranteurs. Which is a shame: the first half was visually arresting and had the potential to be both provocative and interesting. The second half less so.
This is another one of those movies which cause me to scratch my head: what did this want to be? What does the film maker imagine this film to be about?
If you're interested in writing, film-making or whatnot, there is such a thing as the elevator pitch. You're in a lift with some hotshot producer. You've got until those elevator doors ping to pitch your movie. This film, alas, fails that simple test.
The first half has the tone and feel of scabrous satire, clearly wanting to deliver social commentary. Here we are skirting really, really close to the same territory explored by The Menu. The second half discards this and, instead, mimics the dynamic and arc of Wall Street - only with restauranteurs. Which is a shame: the first half was visually arresting and had the potential to be both provocative and interesting. The second half less so.
This is another one of those movies which cause me to scratch my head: what did this want to be? What does the film maker imagine this film to be about?
If you're interested in writing, film-making or whatnot, there is such a thing as the elevator pitch. You're in a lift with some hotshot producer. You've got until those elevator doors ping to pitch your movie. This film, alas, fails that simple test.
The Thai food movie that's a mix of "The Menu" and "Whiplash" is somewhat similar in some ways, but it's not entirely a copy because it has its own storyline. The story is about a middle-class girl who dreams of elevating herself in high society by showcasing her cooking skills. However, her successful recipe doesn't make her as famous as she expected, and the villainous chef is straightforwardly evil. The characters lack depth in the latter part of the movie, turning it into a typical good vs. Evil scenario, leading to a happy ending that's too easy and predictable. Darker viewers may be slightly disappointed, but overall, the movie is enjoyable, with the lead actor charmingly portraying the role, making the viewers engaged in every scene. There are many beautifully shot cooking scenes, and the production value is high. It is the first Thai movie on Netflix that feels like it has reached a high international standard.
Very engaging film for any food lover. The main character played by Chutimon Chuengcharoensukying did a terrific job as an actress. You can really feel the emotions during the intense scenes. Sadly she was the only character with any depth. It felt like her world and everyone was just living in it. The supporting roles were kind of interesting but only surface level.
Many of the plot turns were pretty cheesy. The scenes of violence and the reasons behind them were random, weird and had no build up. The head chef was cool, and stoic, which is to be expected from many successful chefs, however, he had outbursts that didn't make that much sense.
There was a few ominous scenes of rich people living out their gluttony with depictions of them eating flesh-like food. It was a clear dynamic between rich people betrayed as greedy while low-status people betrayed as simply, caring, loving, yet frustrated. It was very interesting to see this depiction, especially during the flashback scene of the Head Chef's upbringing. The comment about the caviar had me burst out laughing.
The cinematography was enjoyable and the dishes looked great. Its probably was kept me engaged the most.
Overall, this film was good. I would recommend it for sure. Many aspects were rushed, and had little development, but remained exciting and had scenes that moved me. The ending will leave most with lots of questions and unfulfilled, but you will give reflections.
Many of the plot turns were pretty cheesy. The scenes of violence and the reasons behind them were random, weird and had no build up. The head chef was cool, and stoic, which is to be expected from many successful chefs, however, he had outbursts that didn't make that much sense.
There was a few ominous scenes of rich people living out their gluttony with depictions of them eating flesh-like food. It was a clear dynamic between rich people betrayed as greedy while low-status people betrayed as simply, caring, loving, yet frustrated. It was very interesting to see this depiction, especially during the flashback scene of the Head Chef's upbringing. The comment about the caviar had me burst out laughing.
The cinematography was enjoyable and the dishes looked great. Its probably was kept me engaged the most.
Overall, this film was good. I would recommend it for sure. Many aspects were rushed, and had little development, but remained exciting and had scenes that moved me. The ending will leave most with lots of questions and unfulfilled, but you will give reflections.
What a weird movie, a very confusing movie that tries way too hard to be impressionable.
The main character is extremely one-dimensional. She pretty much has the same exact facial expression for the entire movie. It's the same deadpan stare that many Asian dramas suffer from.
The story's message is quite simple but the execution is like a hot soda can that exploded inside your car, it's all over the place.
The show is evil, demonic at some points. But for what? It's so extra and beyond that it's comical... Except that it's trying to be serious.
So the result is a bunch of drawn out scenes that do not offer any pleasurable closures. The ending scene is bizarre and the twist comes out of left field.
Give it a try if you desperately need something to try but you won't really be missing out on much if you decide to skip it.
The main character is extremely one-dimensional. She pretty much has the same exact facial expression for the entire movie. It's the same deadpan stare that many Asian dramas suffer from.
The story's message is quite simple but the execution is like a hot soda can that exploded inside your car, it's all over the place.
The show is evil, demonic at some points. But for what? It's so extra and beyond that it's comical... Except that it's trying to be serious.
So the result is a bunch of drawn out scenes that do not offer any pleasurable closures. The ending scene is bizarre and the twist comes out of left field.
Give it a try if you desperately need something to try but you won't really be missing out on much if you decide to skip it.
This film is a commentary on socioeconomic class-divide through food, but not your typical "wow, that's fancy looking food" kinda movie from the food-drama sub-genre.
Plot Aoy (Remember the actor from Bad Genius?), who runs a family noodle shop, wants to be 'special', wants more from life. But how far is she willing to go to become a famous chef? Can she handle everything that will come the fame?
Take Social commentary can sometimes feel too preachy, either the rich or poor side can be made to seem very villainous, but I thought it was fairly balanced here. While there is nothing mind-blowing here, the satire and drama were balanced. Good acting by everybody and also well shot. It's a slow-burn of sorts but the film has a message, that....is thought-provoking, to say the least.
Plot Aoy (Remember the actor from Bad Genius?), who runs a family noodle shop, wants to be 'special', wants more from life. But how far is she willing to go to become a famous chef? Can she handle everything that will come the fame?
Take Social commentary can sometimes feel too preachy, either the rich or poor side can be made to seem very villainous, but I thought it was fairly balanced here. While there is nothing mind-blowing here, the satire and drama were balanced. Good acting by everybody and also well shot. It's a slow-burn of sorts but the film has a message, that....is thought-provoking, to say the least.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe house in the opening scene is the same as that of the movie Parasite
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Hunger?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 26 min(146 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente