AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,1/10
11 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Ao tentar entender o que realmente aconteceu com uma paciente em coma, uma enfermeira acaba descobrindo uma trama de rivalidade, infidelidade, traição e assassinato.Ao tentar entender o que realmente aconteceu com uma paciente em coma, uma enfermeira acaba descobrindo uma trama de rivalidade, infidelidade, traição e assassinato.Ao tentar entender o que realmente aconteceu com uma paciente em coma, uma enfermeira acaba descobrindo uma trama de rivalidade, infidelidade, traição e assassinato.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Cain Aiden
- Student
- (não creditado)
Zak Holland
- Music School Student
- (não creditado)
Sam Lockwood
- Massage Therapist
- (não creditado)
Robbie Main
- Congregation
- (não creditado)
- …
Guy Robbins
- Paramedic
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
Former actress and Hollywood star Katherine wakes from a coma, but is unable to communicate, helped by Nurse Nicky Mackenzie, who tries to unlock the causes of her injury, only her daughter in law seems to have the answers.
Once again, it's curse of number one on Netflix, a movie that on paper should have been very good, but ultimately disappoints.
It's like one of those plush, but dodgy 1980's afternoon movies, if only Katherine had been given a Range Rover, Golden retrievers, a perm, spritz of Fidji, and a box of Terry's All Gold.
A tale of hidden passions, vengeance, loathing and dark secrets, it's hard to care for a single one of them, they're all awful people.
I didn't care for the storyline, or the over the top music, it all jars, it's so clunky.
Famke Janssen does a good job as Katherine, she plays the Lady or The Manor very well, but ultimately she is wasted, she's better than this.
What I want to know, why is this number one, who's actually watching this and enjoying it?
Poor, 5/10.
Once again, it's curse of number one on Netflix, a movie that on paper should have been very good, but ultimately disappoints.
It's like one of those plush, but dodgy 1980's afternoon movies, if only Katherine had been given a Range Rover, Golden retrievers, a perm, spritz of Fidji, and a box of Terry's All Gold.
A tale of hidden passions, vengeance, loathing and dark secrets, it's hard to care for a single one of them, they're all awful people.
I didn't care for the storyline, or the over the top music, it all jars, it's so clunky.
Famke Janssen does a good job as Katherine, she plays the Lady or The Manor very well, but ultimately she is wasted, she's better than this.
What I want to know, why is this number one, who's actually watching this and enjoying it?
Poor, 5/10.
Locked In is generically a modern Gothic story. British, manor, orphans, illness, love affairs, duplicitous characters, plots within plots, etc. All of that, the movie does well.
Do we need another Gothic mystery of orphaned child becoming entwined with a decaying family and its manor? Probably not. Do the actors move past the 2 dimensional nature of their characters? Decidedly no. Does the story line bring anything new or ingenious to the story? A resounding no.
Part of the issue I see is that the main character is the young orphaned girl and her movement into this family and the machinations of the plot. She's not that interesting of a character. And the narrow focus that the film takes toward her shuts out the other characters from being able to provide much richness to the story.
This harkens to the great movie and story of Rebbeca in many ways. But that film allowed other characters room to play, and the uncertainty of motivations and conniving increased the sense of tension and dread. As a copy or comparison of that, this films decidedly missed the mark. As a display of a Gothic story, it does all right.
Do we need another Gothic mystery of orphaned child becoming entwined with a decaying family and its manor? Probably not. Do the actors move past the 2 dimensional nature of their characters? Decidedly no. Does the story line bring anything new or ingenious to the story? A resounding no.
Part of the issue I see is that the main character is the young orphaned girl and her movement into this family and the machinations of the plot. She's not that interesting of a character. And the narrow focus that the film takes toward her shuts out the other characters from being able to provide much richness to the story.
This harkens to the great movie and story of Rebbeca in many ways. But that film allowed other characters room to play, and the uncertainty of motivations and conniving increased the sense of tension and dread. As a copy or comparison of that, this films decidedly missed the mark. As a display of a Gothic story, it does all right.
In this movie Lina is adopted by Kathrine - her dead mother's best friend - to live in a mansion that represents all the luxury and glamour Kathrine is used to but recently lost, as upon her husband's death everything was inherited by Jamie - Kathrine's young stepson.
Will this strange family dynamic prevail or will it all turn into a tragedy?
The movie has good vibes but the story was not strong enough and felt like the characters tension wasn't played out well. It was lacking chemistry and often felt like they all had different ideas about how they should portray the characters.
It was anticlimatic, no big revelations or twists, everything was predictable and well, boring.
It felt like they tried too hard to make it scary or thrilling but failed at the attempt even though they had all these amazing scenery but ultimately failed to give it cinematic justice.
Will this strange family dynamic prevail or will it all turn into a tragedy?
The movie has good vibes but the story was not strong enough and felt like the characters tension wasn't played out well. It was lacking chemistry and often felt like they all had different ideas about how they should portray the characters.
It was anticlimatic, no big revelations or twists, everything was predictable and well, boring.
It felt like they tried too hard to make it scary or thrilling but failed at the attempt even though they had all these amazing scenery but ultimately failed to give it cinematic justice.
This forgettable Netflix thriller is poorly directed, acted and written that I felt ' locked in' and couldn't do anything to turn it off.
Laura would have loved to have tortured me with this junk!
It's unthrilling in its storytelling- no tension, suspense or action so it doesn't grab the audience from the beginning.
It's look is purely TV , a unfocused ,dimly lit splurge- that midway through Laura thought she was watching a TV show by asking" how many episodes is this?" The only thing frightening and creepy is Famke Janssen's face job!
It's also hilarious to see a hospital utterly devoid of other people/patients: day or night- believe me there's always someone about.
When Netflix finance films for their network - Reptile being a prime example, they do it with style and finesse, here it's tedious, bottom of the barrel mid 90s direct to DVD schlock.
Laura would have loved to have tortured me with this junk!
It's unthrilling in its storytelling- no tension, suspense or action so it doesn't grab the audience from the beginning.
It's look is purely TV , a unfocused ,dimly lit splurge- that midway through Laura thought she was watching a TV show by asking" how many episodes is this?" The only thing frightening and creepy is Famke Janssen's face job!
It's also hilarious to see a hospital utterly devoid of other people/patients: day or night- believe me there's always someone about.
When Netflix finance films for their network - Reptile being a prime example, they do it with style and finesse, here it's tedious, bottom of the barrel mid 90s direct to DVD schlock.
The premise of a woman who can't communicate after an accident but still finds a way to let her nurse know that someone tried to kill her starts off interesting. But let me save you your time: this movie is bad and will add nothing but sorrow to your life.
ALL the characters are annoying and make the dumbest decisions possible every single time. I would explain with examples, but then my review would be classified as containing spoilers and I wouldn't be able to save people that haven't yet wasted their time with this.
It's an infuriating, uninspired, very predictable movie. Rating it a 3 is being generous.
ALL the characters are annoying and make the dumbest decisions possible every single time. I would explain with examples, but then my review would be classified as containing spoilers and I wouldn't be able to save people that haven't yet wasted their time with this.
It's an infuriating, uninspired, very predictable movie. Rating it a 3 is being generous.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe story line is a direct adaptation of Émile Zola's novel "Thérèse Raquin", published for the first time in Paris in 1867.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Locked In?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Encierro
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 36 min(96 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente