AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,6/10
2,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Jake recebe uma pata de macaco que concede 3 desejos. Após os dois primeiros desejos deixarem seu amigo Cobb morto-vivo, Cobb empurra Jake para fazer um último desejo.Jake recebe uma pata de macaco que concede 3 desejos. Após os dois primeiros desejos deixarem seu amigo Cobb morto-vivo, Cobb empurra Jake para fazer um último desejo.Jake recebe uma pata de macaco que concede 3 desejos. Após os dois primeiros desejos deixarem seu amigo Cobb morto-vivo, Cobb empurra Jake para fazer um último desejo.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Avaliações em destaque
The bottom line: don't waste your time. This should not be called "The Monkey's Paw." This has nothing to do with the original story. I am so very disappointed! I was hoping that the story was brought to the big screen. I could not be any more wrong. I highly suggest for viewers who like the original story NOT to view the movie. However, if you have never read the original story or do not like the original story, watch the movie an decide for yourself how bad the movie REALLY is. Truly, it id REALLY bad. If you decide to waste your time with this movie, I hope you have the chance to do something else constructive in parallel. I hope somebody decides to remake this movie the way it is supposed to be.
I had never heard of the story before, so I didn't have any preconceptions. It's not too bad, but it switched back and forth between dead serious and camp and not very effectively.
Thomason and Lang both do a job, but Thomason plays it completely seriously while Lang plays it like a Freddy Krueger.
There's also a hint of a subplot that goes nowhere, where the cops and others suspect Thomason's character is doing the murders. Not the newest plot and it would take it in a Hitcher direction, but it could have worked here. The cops SHOULD have suspected him.
Thomason and Lang both do a job, but Thomason plays it completely seriously while Lang plays it like a Freddy Krueger.
There's also a hint of a subplot that goes nowhere, where the cops and others suspect Thomason's character is doing the murders. Not the newest plot and it would take it in a Hitcher direction, but it could have worked here. The cops SHOULD have suspected him.
Too many 'plot devices' by the writer/director in place of coherent storytelling.
What could have been an intriguing story about the paw was turned into a murder/slasher movie, which would not have been terrible if the murders made sense.
1. The villain has Flash-like abilities, no not really fast, but somehow appears wherever he needs to be in a few minutes (plot convenience). 2. The protagonist has the ability to warn people but instead talks in vague circles so the people in danger do not react (plot convenience). 3. Dumbest police ever (again). 4. The movie is about the paw, which is rarely seen. It is almost like they created a slasher movie first then added the paw element as an added twist so that is does not appear like a generic slasher movie (but it is). 5. The person with most screen time is the worst actor in movie. He never exudes any real emotion regardless of situation. 6. Charles S Dutton as the cop was wasted opportunity.
Positive? Stephen Lang plays his part very well.
What could have been an intriguing story about the paw was turned into a murder/slasher movie, which would not have been terrible if the murders made sense.
1. The villain has Flash-like abilities, no not really fast, but somehow appears wherever he needs to be in a few minutes (plot convenience). 2. The protagonist has the ability to warn people but instead talks in vague circles so the people in danger do not react (plot convenience). 3. Dumbest police ever (again). 4. The movie is about the paw, which is rarely seen. It is almost like they created a slasher movie first then added the paw element as an added twist so that is does not appear like a generic slasher movie (but it is). 5. The person with most screen time is the worst actor in movie. He never exudes any real emotion regardless of situation. 6. Charles S Dutton as the cop was wasted opportunity.
Positive? Stephen Lang plays his part very well.
Seriously. This is a far much better film than its current, weak rating. There is also a serious flaw in IMDb's rating system. I think maybe members should have to actually be members for more than 1 day to leave a vote for ratings. 30, 60...maybe 90 days before you can vote or review a film unless you are a legitimate film critic with your own online site. Too many terrible films get very high ratings because people involved in the films get to create a new account and leave "Best Film Ever" reviews and "10 out of 10" ratings. Then, films like this one, which obviously deserves a much higher rating, end up having people leave "Worst Film Ever" reviews and "1 out of 10" ratings. Do you have a grudge against someone involved in this film? Not get the part you so desperately wanted? Did the director boink your girlfriend? No problem! Come on over to IMDb, create a new account and you can instantly voice just how terrible, poorly written and horribly acted the film was. Not to mention the director has a small penis.
I seriously need to set up my own film review site. You may not always agree with my reviews, but you can sure as hell know they are honest and not because I had something to do with any particular film one way or another, good or bad. Chiller Films' remake of THE MONKEY'S PAW is a very good movie with an original story. It's very well acted, shot, directed, and edited. It is not the "Best Film Ever," but it is damn well worth viewing and one of the best horror/comedies I have watched all year! Yes, this is indeed some serious monkey business! Now give me your paw...
I seriously need to set up my own film review site. You may not always agree with my reviews, but you can sure as hell know they are honest and not because I had something to do with any particular film one way or another, good or bad. Chiller Films' remake of THE MONKEY'S PAW is a very good movie with an original story. It's very well acted, shot, directed, and edited. It is not the "Best Film Ever," but it is damn well worth viewing and one of the best horror/comedies I have watched all year! Yes, this is indeed some serious monkey business! Now give me your paw...
+1 for Stephen Lang's performance here Such a great character actor and a pleasure to watch him play just about any part
-1 For the Ending Where a certain So and So stopped beating another certain So and So...no spoilers, haha
Okay a Story told fairly blandly and ends up being pretty average and really only saved by the additions of Lang and an underused Charles Dutton
-1 For the Ending Where a certain So and So stopped beating another certain So and So...no spoilers, haha
Okay a Story told fairly blandly and ends up being pretty average and really only saved by the additions of Lang and an underused Charles Dutton
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesLoosely based on the short story by W. W. Jacobs of the same name.
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen Jake crashes the Mustang into the tree, neither the passenger's or driver's side airbag deploy.
- Citações
Tony Cobb: You still drinking beer?
Jake Tilton: Hey, man, does a frog scratch his ass before he farts?
Tony Cobb: Here's to the life, huh?
Jake Tilton: Yeah. Carry on.
- ConexõesVersion of The Monkey's Paw (1915)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Monkey's Paw?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Monkey's Paw
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 694.068 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 31 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.78 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente