Protocol 7

This film is successful in conveying the message because it brings the human element to the forefront. It is easy to make "public health" into a game of statistics. Protocol 7 keeps it human, almost all the time.

In her book "Oneness vs the 1%" Vandana Shiva has a term called "Ontological Schizophrenia" which refers to how people can simultaneously celebrate marvelous progressive inventions, drugs etc., while ignoring the desperate species-threatening aspects of the so-called "marvelous thing". The disparity between business and humanity is wonderfully conveyed in Protocol 7 and it is clear where the line of differentiation lands with Merck and their "moral chicanery." I left the theater inspired with hope for legal justice and angry that it has taken 10-years in litigation while the populace suffers and the snake-oil cadre wallows in luxury. This is a MUST SEE film and a must experience time. Another Home Run for Andy Wakefield and for those who choose to endure the weight of the subject in his artistry.

So compelling and of course disturbing. More evidence of intentional deception regarding childhood vaxxes. Even with the evidence presented, this case is still in the courts. The only complaint was a bit too much screen time on the main character's yoga moves! The striking lead actress became resolute and powerful as a lawyer and mother of an autistic child. I felt her strength but also her weariness. The most moving scene was the father witnessing the transformation in his son. The most inspiring part of the story is the courage of conviction lived out by real people. A rarity today! May truth prevail!

It is not anti-science to assert that much of "science" done today by Big Pharma is corrupt.

Andy walks us through a story, showing how the corporate pressures to make profits are putting our children's health at risk.

He shows how many who are now "anti-vaxxers" were very much pro-vaccine until their child was injured *right after* a "wellness visit."

People can make ad-hominem attacks all they want. Such attacks are a known category of logical fallacy for a reason.

Watch with an open mind. Afterwards, read Euripides' substack to see how Big Pharma launched a massive attack to discredit Dr. Wakefield.

All in all, great work by Andy.

I had a view of the inside seat in 2002 when Wakefield was sacked for his findings. It looked very much like a hit job on him to avoid him ruining a multi-billion dollar income stream for pharmaceutical companies.

Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.

Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)

Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?

At last the truth is out. Big Pharma, the government, and corporate medicine can't cover up the dangers of modern vaccine production any longer. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Is a whistleblower ahead of his time. Beware if you are forced into getting a jab! Ask questions. Do your own research. The acting and script were easy to follow, even for a layman. Showing what goes on behind the scenes at drug companies is a public service. Doctors spouting medical tropes with no regard for the rights of individual patients was terrifying but true. Dramatizing the actual deposition testimony was brilliant. The audience was deeply engaged.