Autoridades dos EUA simulam um golpe após uma eleição contestada. Os insurgentes tomam as capitais, questionando o controle militar do presidente. O combate à desinformação é vital, destacan... Ler tudoAutoridades dos EUA simulam um golpe após uma eleição contestada. Os insurgentes tomam as capitais, questionando o controle militar do presidente. O combate à desinformação é vital, destacando a defesa bipartidária da democracia.Autoridades dos EUA simulam um golpe após uma eleição contestada. Os insurgentes tomam as capitais, questionando o controle militar do presidente. O combate à desinformação é vital, destacando a defesa bipartidária da democracia.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Avaliações em destaque
The people involved are all solid government and ex-gov officials with excellent reputations and solid experience. The production crew are all ex-military with good reasons to be concerned about the infiltration of extremists in the military.
There are a lot of bad-faith review writers commenting. Ignore them and watch for yourself. It plays out in a realistic manner and the ending is thought provoking.
With the potential for another "Jan 6" looming next year we all need to think about what might happen and be prepared to be on the side of our government and the non-violent transfer of power.
The presence of retired service members and serious former government officials who served under administrations of both parties adds weight to the simulation. The documentary, while not perfect, is generally well done and offers a good look at how it progressed.
Obviously this is framed in relation to January 6, and how you feel about that is going to color your perspective on the doc. But if you take the subject seriously, don't let the bad faith review bombing and conspiracy theorists scare you away. Watch and judge for yourself.
That said, January 6th was a shocking moment that reverberated around the world and left me, a non US citizen, absolutely stunned. A lot of documentaries have been made about the day, what went wrong and why. Charges were brought up, courts did their thing and in the end... well, you know what happened.
What this exercise attempts to do is recreate the same event but with a bit more spicing to the mix, and therein lies the problem. Everyone who has participated in this exercise has been in politics in one way, shape or form. These people have, without a doubt, studied the events of that day and by default went in this exercise, albeit somewhat in the dark, still aware of possible consequences to their decisions. They're essentially fighting a battle that has already been won... despite the monkey wrenches the game master throws at them.
The documentary touches of militias, radicalized current and former members of armed forces, high ranking members of the armed forces taking political stances and the risk that comes with that, being able to order their troops to take a side in an event like the one on January 6th when a close election happened. It's all a bit too farfetched, but then again so was the attack on the Capitol... until it happened.
My gripe is that this concept has the potential to be brilliant, if for no other reason than to inform the public, to give them insight on how decision making takes place behind closed doors. A while ago a TV show named the West Wing did just that, with the exception of adding drama to spice things up, but it gave the audience an inside look into politics... and itch I don't think any other program has satisfied since.
War Game scenario has that potential. Picture a random group of politicians brought together having a random crisis thrown their way and watching them trying to navigate it. Picture two groups, unaware of each other, playing off each other by trying to achieve their respective goal. I mean, I know there would be some level of "censorship" of the process... but it would still be an incredible watch.
Either way, I initially gave this a 5, but I did so having only watched until the half way point. The second half of the documentary sees things pick up the pace and become quite tense... for an exercise.
It's a fascinating watch. And also, that was one hell of a presidential speech.
The bias of the producers and their identity politics devalues whatever aims this documentary was trying to achieve. In many cases I found the responses proposed by the former Democratic party office holders acting in this to be more disturbing than what they were trying to warn against. In multiple cases they attempted to justify the censorship of free speech, the invasion of privacy of U. S. citizens with illegal wire tapping and the declaration of Martial law.
I don't have much more to add that was not already mentioned in the 4 star review, "This Meeting Could Have Been an Email: "War Game" Is a Stuffy, Boring, and Self-Righteous Attempt at Establishment Agitprop" only that for the love of God someone tell Heidi Heitkamp she is not the POTUS.
The fact that the producers are blatantly attempting to make this movie about Jan 6 is bewildering along with their effort to discredit the military, especially the general who thinks that the military should be purged. There is plenty propaganda to make viewers cringe because of it's shamelessness.
Some people might enjoy the theme, but most people will find it boring, contrived, inorganic, and missed opportunity to have a real dialogue about what makes the US unique, a diversity of ideals working towards a single purpose.
Você sabia?
- Citações
Red Cell Leader: We are here to stress test our National Security system. I want them to be prepared for the worst case scenario.
Principais escolhas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Sõjamäng
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 111.088
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 14.040
- 4 de ago. de 2024
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 111.088
- Tempo de duração1 hora 34 minutos
- Cor