The documentary tries to build a very lopsided narrative which tries to portray Amarmani in some angelic light. For instance, a very small amount of time is spent on showing Madhumita's roots and journey. On the other hand almost half an episode is dedicated to tracing Amarmani's roots - grandfather, uncle, political movement, etc etc.
Then, at one point Amarmani's daughters make unsubstantiated claims of his innocence, they're never grilled on it. But when they make claims questioning Madhumita's sister Nidhi, we see a follow up with Nidhi being grilled on it. Similarly, at one point his daughters say they were too small to understand what was happening with the case, and yet later they say "we were actually happy at first that CBI was picking up the case". Again no follow-up grilling.
The worst part is that the documentary also tries to portray Madhumita as a power-hungry, "over-ambitious" woman with "lots of love interests." Not only is that blatant victim shaming (how does this connect with her murder? Did she deserve being murdered over these traits?) but they are also convenient misogynistic assertions (adjectives like these are rarely used for men).
Overall disappointed and shocked at Discovery for producing / backing something like this.
