Enquanto atua como jurado em um julgamento por assassinato, um homem se vê em um dilema moral, podendo influenciar o veredito do júri.Enquanto atua como jurado em um julgamento por assassinato, um homem se vê em um dilema moral, podendo influenciar o veredito do júri.Enquanto atua como jurado em um julgamento por assassinato, um homem se vê em um dilema moral, podendo influenciar o veredito do júri.
- Prêmios
- 4 vitórias e 12 indicações no total
Melanie Harrison
- Campaign Manager
- (narração)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesKiefer Sutherland got his part by writing to Clint Eastwood telling him how big a fan of his he was, and that he wanted to star in one of his movies before he retired. Kiefer's dad, Donald Sutherland, had co-starred with Clint in Os Guerreiros Pilantras (1970) and Cowboys do Espaço (2000).
- Erros de gravaçãoJuror #2 is sitting in the third seat, not the second seat.
- Citações
Larry Lasker: We're only as sick as our secrets.
- ConexõesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Movies of 2024 (2024)
- Trilhas sonorasHard Livin'
Written by Chris Stapleton and Kendell Marvel
Performed by Chris Stapleton
Courtesy of Mercury Nashville Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Avaliação em destaque
Juror #2 directed by the iconic Clint Eastwood, Juror #2 brings together an incredible cast led by Kiefer Sutherland, Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, and J. K. Simmons. This courtroom drama explores the complexities of jury deliberation in a murder trial that involves themes of domestic abuse. The story is immediately engaging, setting up a clear-cut case, but it soon dives deep into moral territory, where the right verdict is anything but straightforward.
As a non-U. S. viewer, I found the trial process and jury dynamics especially fascinating. Eastwood cleverly exposes the issues of biased jurors and the impact of personal agendas. The film makes you question how often jurors-pressed by personal motivations outside the courtroom-lose sight of the real deliberation required to reach a just decision. This theme feels disturbingly relevant and is well-executed here.
Though this is Eastwood's 45th directorial work, I'd say Juror #2 isn't his best. At times, it struggles with pacing, which occasionally dampens the tension that should be building. Still, the stellar performances from the cast and the moral questions it raises make it a thought-provoking watch, and it's a worthwhile addition to Eastwood's body of work.
As a non-U. S. viewer, I found the trial process and jury dynamics especially fascinating. Eastwood cleverly exposes the issues of biased jurors and the impact of personal agendas. The film makes you question how often jurors-pressed by personal motivations outside the courtroom-lose sight of the real deliberation required to reach a just decision. This theme feels disturbingly relevant and is well-executed here.
Though this is Eastwood's 45th directorial work, I'd say Juror #2 isn't his best. At times, it struggles with pacing, which occasionally dampens the tension that should be building. Still, the stellar performances from the cast and the moral questions it raises make it a thought-provoking watch, and it's a worthwhile addition to Eastwood's body of work.
- SinceNovember2000
- 1 de nov. de 2024
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Juror #2?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 30.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 24.800.000
- Tempo de duração1 hora 54 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente