15 Cameras

I haven't seen the two movies before this one although I am aware of how they run.

This is a fairly solid piece of work. A house with history, a decent bad guy and a creepy premise. The direction is ok, the acting is good, the script is a little so so, there is plot plenty of tension and general creepiness.

Some of the plot points are a little weird. Such as the reaction when people are found in other people's houses, why does nobody call the police at any time? And the ending is a little strange.

Overall, I guess if you liked the previous two movies then this this will not disappoint at all.

Aptly named 15 cameras as a third instalment to the previous two movies the first 13 cameras and the second 14 cameras. I find I'm at a loss for words as to why they gave him the name slumlord for this follow up movie instead of the name from the previous two movies. But anyways the plot was decent enough. But there's gaps in things like the hidden surveillance room he was in I could've sworn the first time he discovered it. It was on their side of the duplex and not the tenants side. I also don't get why they didn't cast the same guy that played the main character in 13 and 14 cameras either. But they did a decent job at casting a guy that looked similar enough that a lot of ppl might not question it. But I watch a lot of movies.

Three is a crowd - no wait that's not it .. also no pun intended. In case you are similar to me you may not know that this is the third movie in a series ... the first one is 13 cameras ... and then 14 cameras was the second one. Now it is not only the title that is changing (or the amount of cameras) ... although to be fair, the second one felt a bit too close to the first one. Different but same, if that makes sense.

This one has a special twist (to do with the cameras I suppose), but it also tells the story a bit differently ... I would like to state that not everyone would "seize" the opportunity as the main character does here. It will be a bit tough to root for him - for that and many other reasons. The actor tries his best to make him at least a bit likeable ... especially towards the end ... but even having the shadow (and then some) of someone way more evil hanging over his head (behind his back?) ... well it ain't going to cut it ... might be the best of them all ... but still not sure if it is worth it all ... or worth watching all the movies just for a climax ... acting is quite good for the genre.

It's incredible to me that the '13 Cameras' series has somehow become one of the most consistently good horror trilogies. Three films and they're all great in their own way. '15 Cameras' changes the formula up a bit, but it does it in a really interesting and twisted way. This film was a blast.

I usually dislike horror movies where the majority of the film is set during the day, however '15 Cameras' proved that it can work. It also proved that you can have a dark and twisted film without someone having to die every 10 minutes. There is actually very little in the way of kills or even on-screen danger for the majority of the film, however there is still always an unease and darkness readily apparent.

I love the concept of a regular and good person being put in a chance position that corrupts them and turns them into something they weren't before. That is really interesting to me. This film was a good time. 8.5/10.

This is a fun and very flawed movie. Cleverly constructed, with massive plot holes and annoying characters - yet somehow they are all endearing. I don't know why, but I really liked the characters, even the ultra annoying and stupid lead "Cam" ironically named.

This is the third in the camera series 13 and 14. I think this is the best one, using a meta plot around documentary that features the villain of the first two.

Overall, it's a popcorn flick. Don't take it serious, there are massive plot holes and a lot of the dialogue is pointless...but I still enjoyed those meandering scenes. If you want to zone out with a bottle of wine this could be a fun choice 6.2/10.