AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,1/10
3,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Na zona rural de Massachusetts, Lacy, de 11 anos, passa o verão de 91 em casa, encantada com sua própria imaginação e com a atenção de sua mãe, Janet. Com o passar dos meses, três visitantes... Ler tudoNa zona rural de Massachusetts, Lacy, de 11 anos, passa o verão de 91 em casa, encantada com sua própria imaginação e com a atenção de sua mãe, Janet. Com o passar dos meses, três visitantes entram em sua órbita, todos cativados por Janet.Na zona rural de Massachusetts, Lacy, de 11 anos, passa o verão de 91 em casa, encantada com sua própria imaginação e com a atenção de sua mãe, Janet. Com o passar dos meses, três visitantes entram em sua órbita, todos cativados por Janet.
- Prêmios
- 4 vitórias e 22 indicações no total
Luke Philip Bosco
- Male Counselor
- (as Luke Bosco)
Avaliações em destaque
There's a difference between minimalist and vacuous, and writer-director Annie Baker doesn't seem to know the difference. The playwright's debut feature, to put it simply, is boring, pretentious, meandering, unfocused and a big, fat waste of time. It's so dull, in fact, that the film makes the works of Kelly Reichardt appear utterly fascinating. Set in 1991 in the hippie-dominated arts community of rural western Massachusetts, the film follows the story (if one could even call it that) of middle-aged acupuncturist Janet (Julianne Nicholson) as she struggles to sort out what appears to have been a wayward, meandering life. And, as this tale plays out, it faithfully sticks to that course, too, an influence that's clearly wearing off on Janet's equally clueless, incessantly brooding, 8-year-old daughter, Lacy (newcomer Zoe Ziegler). Along the way, the duo experiences an array of cryptic, inconsequential involvements with others who are apparently fascinated with Janet (though goodness knows why), all of whom (Will Patton, Sophie Okonedo, Elias Koteas) are just as lost and boring as Janet is. So what's the point in all this? Who knows - and, not long into the picture, who cares? The raves that have been showered on this tedious, tiresome piece of filmmaking are a complete mystery to me, given its prevailing mundane nature and monotone performances by players who all sound like they've been shot up with sodium pentothal. Nicholson, in particular, comes across as so disengaged that she probably could have just as easily phoned in this performance (despite claims that this is the breakthrough role that she's supposedly been waiting for - please, watch her in "August: Osage County" (2013) instead). What's more, this picture probably has some of the worst sound quality I've ever seen in a contemporary production - so bad that I had to struggle to be able to hear what was being said (and I was sitting in the theater's second row). And the film's feeble attempts at trying to incorporate some kind of subtle, nuanced metaphysical undercurrent fail miserably as well, treated almost as if their inclusion was an afterthought. If you dare to consider giving this one a look, make sure you don't watch it when you're tired - you just might fall asleep soon after the opening credits roll, an understandable reaction, to be sure.
11 year old Lacy is exceedingly close with her single mother Janet (Julianne Nicholson). It's 1991. She threatens suicide to get out of summer camp to be home with her mother.
This is not for everyone and I'm not sure that it is for me. This movie is slow. The scenes are long and extended. Some of it is like watching paint dry. You do get to live inside this world and with this family. There are some fun ideas like the cult. The men are mostly forgettable. In the end, this is just too slow for the general public. It takes a specific audience and I can't give this a generalized recommendation.
This is not for everyone and I'm not sure that it is for me. This movie is slow. The scenes are long and extended. Some of it is like watching paint dry. You do get to live inside this world and with this family. There are some fun ideas like the cult. The men are mostly forgettable. In the end, this is just too slow for the general public. It takes a specific audience and I can't give this a generalized recommendation.
This isn't a terrible movie, but is lacking in originality. I think that, given time, director Annie Baker will find her own voice instead of trying to be Greta Gerwig. If she works with Zoe Ziegler again, she'll hopefully stop trying to turn her into the new young Saoirse Ronan, too, and let Zoe act in her own way, as I suspect she can.
The basic plot here has been done, in various ways, in many, many far better movies. Baker tried to stuff too much in here, too. The subplot, if you can call it that, about the mother was incomplete and distracted from what the young girl was going through as she was dealing with the changes she was experiencing. Sure, the relation between the mother and daughter was integral to the film, but seemed incomplete, never resolved. It was never really examined in the depth it could have been. That might have been due to the slow pace of the movie. Too little happened over too much time.
The men in the movie were never really fleshed out, either. Most obvious was "Wayne", who was sort of a good guy, but at the same time, not. We never really got to know anything about him, other than he had a nice daughter.
By sheer coincidence I just saw "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret." a couple of days before I saw "Janet Planet". One could argue they are wildly different movies, but at the same time, they do cover similar topics. "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret." is far better, more entertaining, and more realistic. It's fun. "Janet Planet" is dull in comparison.
But the biggest and most obvious comparison that jumps out at you as you watch "Janet Planet" would be between it and "Lady Bird". They are much more similar films than the one I mentioned above. And "Lady Bird" is much, much better.
As I said, this isn't a terrible film. I look forward to seeing what Baker can do in the future. I'm sure she has a much better film in her.
As an aside, the best song in the movie was "Miracle Man" by Bob Carpenter. Too bad it was associated with the "Wayne" character.
The basic plot here has been done, in various ways, in many, many far better movies. Baker tried to stuff too much in here, too. The subplot, if you can call it that, about the mother was incomplete and distracted from what the young girl was going through as she was dealing with the changes she was experiencing. Sure, the relation between the mother and daughter was integral to the film, but seemed incomplete, never resolved. It was never really examined in the depth it could have been. That might have been due to the slow pace of the movie. Too little happened over too much time.
The men in the movie were never really fleshed out, either. Most obvious was "Wayne", who was sort of a good guy, but at the same time, not. We never really got to know anything about him, other than he had a nice daughter.
By sheer coincidence I just saw "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret." a couple of days before I saw "Janet Planet". One could argue they are wildly different movies, but at the same time, they do cover similar topics. "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret." is far better, more entertaining, and more realistic. It's fun. "Janet Planet" is dull in comparison.
But the biggest and most obvious comparison that jumps out at you as you watch "Janet Planet" would be between it and "Lady Bird". They are much more similar films than the one I mentioned above. And "Lady Bird" is much, much better.
As I said, this isn't a terrible film. I look forward to seeing what Baker can do in the future. I'm sure she has a much better film in her.
As an aside, the best song in the movie was "Miracle Man" by Bob Carpenter. Too bad it was associated with the "Wayne" character.
It was such a strange trip that seemed so narrow than it should have been. I feel like i liked the movie because of how strangely similar me and this little girl's life is. It does not match up perfectly but i got what she was going through enough to enjoy what I saw on the screen.
That is not the best review for a movie, because realistic the only thing the movie does have to it is a relatable factor because it does not come with much emotional backage to it. Although in fairness that could be the part of the film i did not relate to.
Honestly could not recommend this film to anyway. Although I was entertained, I fear that would just be me.
That is not the best review for a movie, because realistic the only thing the movie does have to it is a relatable factor because it does not come with much emotional backage to it. Although in fairness that could be the part of the film i did not relate to.
Honestly could not recommend this film to anyway. Although I was entertained, I fear that would just be me.
A smallish drama from last year starring Julianne Nicholson & newcomer Zoe Ziegler, playing a mother/daughter navigating the lazy days of summer during the early 90's. Living in a cozy cabin in the woods, the pair while away the days waiting for the new school year to start while also taking care of their romantic needs; mom seems to be unlucky in love as her conveyor belt of lovers (which include Will Patton & Elias Koteas) has left her unsatisfied while Ziegler, seemingly wise beyond the years, does things her own way w/her mom's begrudging acceptance. Not much monumentally happens in this slow burn slice of life as it just exists & we, the audience, just wallow in it which charms in tiny doses in writer/director Annie Baker's effort making this feel like a documentary then something scripted.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesZoe Ziegler's on-screen acting debut. According to Annie Baker, Ziegler was not cast in the lead role of Lacy until about a month before shooting began.
- Erros de gravaçãoOne of the tunes played in the final scene, "Unstoppable", was composed and performed by Noah VanNorstrand, who was born after the year in which the film was set.
- ConexõesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 974: Nosferatu (2025)
- Trilhas sonorasThe Littlest Worm
Performed by Zoe Ziegler, Luke Philip Bosco, and June Walker Grossman
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Janet Planet?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 793.638
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 47.463
- 23 de jun. de 2024
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 805.694
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 53 min(113 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente