Christmas in Scotland

The Scotish town is, obvious, the main star of this good intentioned Christmas film but bad served by script and by acting.

Cliches and nothing more. That seems be all, not exactly smart used.

The recipe is more than familiar and American - European clash not so inspired used.

But, with some serious indulgence, a pretty easy film about a conservative man - his transformation is jus unrealistic - , a free spirit young woman, a town decorated for a Christmas contest and the so predictable end. And, indeed, a beautiful castle and a good fist of historical informations.

Enough for balls of thoughts about ordinary problems, for nice images of town and for very - very easy entertainment.

The good point, in my case, nice job of Caroline Deyga. Is it enough ?

În fact, can you expect more ?

As 1 reviewer noted, most of these cheap rom/com films are made by Canadians, Reel One & Hallmark. The only American influence in most is just cash. There is 1 reviewer from Canada bashing Americans for this film, what a joke - look in the mirror buddy.

Don't blame Americans for another crappy portrayal of someone from New York to save the day in Scotland or any other country they visit, it feels like the Canadians who put out this trash are trying to make Americans look bad, while ignoring their own ineptitude.

As someone who lived in Scotland, Edzell, I agree with most of the comments. I can't stand the way these films always have a know-it-all city female character who is smarter than all the small town locals, whether it's Scotland or Kentucky.

I'm always very apprehensive about US movie makers doing UK-set movies as they are never very accurate. This one does have some British actors, which makes a real difference. There could be more use of Scottish landscape / locations to have better impact. Whilst I have some niggles with the detail, I totally empathise with the multi-generation juggle - there's a good mix of ages, and it's nice to have the young niece rather than yet another bereaved kid and widow(er) situation. With several characters over 50, I won't grow out it like others so would watch again. If you want more about Lairds, watch the UK-made Monarch of the Glen.

Christmas In Scotland (2023) -

This was a film that tried to show the difference between the cultures on the opposite sides of the pond, but ultimately it just made the Scottish people look stupid and backwards and it didn't do much for the Americans either.

I think it's rare that the U. S. companies making a Christmas film in the U. K. do them very well and this one was more proof of that theory. It's like they don't know how to direct Brits and don't even think about utilising someone that knows what life is actually like over here or how we really behave. In some ways it feels as if the American style of filming rubs the wrong way against our British way.

The story had a lot of similarities to a number of mixed nationality seasonal films, but especially 'A Yorkshire Christmas/A Very British Christmas' (2019), however the leading actor, Mark Killeen was at least hot in that one and the leading lady had an appeal and heart.

In fact the acting in this film was generally terrible.

Jill Winternitz seemed pretty ineffectual as the lead Emma and the Scottish Dominic Watters was not appealing in his role of Alex. His grumpy character made it a struggle to believe that he would ever mellow or change, even for love.

Also, Emma's Dad, Mike (Toby Rolt) was incredibly extreme! I don't know anybody that talks like that, except when they're taking the mickey out of William Shatner. And the first boyfriend Brad (Adam Bond) was more than a bit creepy. He must have paid a lot for the photos on his IMDB page, that's all I can say.

Also, my Sister is actually a Laird, because she bought a square foot of land in Scotland, so I'm not sure that being a Laird actually has as much power anymore, as it was shown here.

I did give up on this film in the end, because I just couldn't put myself through another one that was going to annoy me. I was riled up very early on and I don't need to do that to myself.

Unscored as Unfinished.

I wanted to love this film, I really did, but the acting is just so fake. All of the characters come across as "played", not authentic at all. Every smile, every look, every blink feels planned. If you asked some AI robots to play out a script, it would probably approach the acting in this film.

As I gathered my thoughts on this film, I realized why I felt let down; because it could have been great! I think the concept wasn't inherently bad. As a European, I've seen many films about real and fake European countries that adopt or portray various European cultures and they usually lack an accurate portayal of monarchies, laws, culture, etc. In equal measure. In fact, I think this film's portrayal of Scottish culture is actually not so terrible.

The major letdown in its portrayal of Scotland is the idea that modern rural villages can be owned entirely by a powerful laird who lives in a grand castle and orders the villagers around. It felt pretentious. I think they could've found ways around this. Instead, they relied on an antiquated part of Scottish history which only turns viewers off altogether.

Besides this mistake, much of the culture portrayed is actually done fairly well. The male lead's accent is heavy but not uncommon in certain parts of Scotland and executed quite well. The tartan elements and other cultural references are also fairly accurate.

To summarize, this film is a letdown because its makers let low budget restrictions affect the execution of a concept that had potential. They did not hire actors of adequate quality to carry the film either. As evidenced by other films, inexperienced actors don't have to be bad. Even on a low budget, I think they could've found better actors but simply didn't search hard enough. The cultural references are actually decent, although not all of these traditions are widespread in the more populated parts of the country, but the portrayal of a modern laird poisons the script.