Just okay.
The problems with this documentary is a lack of structure.
It is presented in a chronological order. But it lacked cohesiveness. There was no over arching theme. A plot if you will.
It develops character, but lacked real substance. Why did he do something? It goes from vignette to vignette without any regard for the audience. I never felt like I was part of anything that was presented. It never drew me in.
Focus on one aspect of his life, rather than presenting a shot gun approach. Segmentation instead of fragmentation.
The way it was presented... Well the kindest thing I can say was: there cert was no lack of slowness.
It is presented in a chronological order. But it lacked cohesiveness. There was no over arching theme. A plot if you will.
It develops character, but lacked real substance. Why did he do something? It goes from vignette to vignette without any regard for the audience. I never felt like I was part of anything that was presented. It never drew me in.
Focus on one aspect of his life, rather than presenting a shot gun approach. Segmentation instead of fragmentation.
The way it was presented... Well the kindest thing I can say was: there cert was no lack of slowness.
- wayno-6
- 18 de nov. de 2024