Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn investigation of 9/11.An investigation of 9/11.An investigation of 9/11.
Fotos
Alberto Angela
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
George W. Bush
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Mike Canavan
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Dick Cheney
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Ron DiFrancesco
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Richard Gage
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Rudy Giuliani
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
John Gross
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Mark Loizeaux
- Self - Debunker
- (as Mark Loiseaux)
John McCain
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
James Meigs
- Self
- (as Jim Meigs)
Norman Mineta
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Michael Moore
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Avaliações em destaque
This documentary is one of the most thoroughly researched, honest, unbiased compilations of evidence, footage, interviews charts, graphs I have ever seen. I was stunned....a Must See for the inquiring mind.
It does utilize the Socratic method so that the viewer can make up their own mind as to what happened, why, and who benefited.
I highly encourage everyone to see this and pass it on. How it took me until 2023 to even hear of it, I don't know, but my heart goes out to the victims families, and to the still-dying firefighters who suffer from cancers due to the inhalations.
Incredibly well done...fascinating. I was floored...aghast...and sad to think that everything it reveals ... is more than likely true.
It does utilize the Socratic method so that the viewer can make up their own mind as to what happened, why, and who benefited.
I highly encourage everyone to see this and pass it on. How it took me until 2023 to even hear of it, I don't know, but my heart goes out to the victims families, and to the still-dying firefighters who suffer from cancers due to the inhalations.
Incredibly well done...fascinating. I was floored...aghast...and sad to think that everything it reveals ... is more than likely true.
There are a lot of documentaries about an alleged conspiracy to cover-up the true cause of 9/11. None of them reach the level of The New Pearl Harbor both on a sheer informational level as well as from a storytelling angle. If you only watch one doc related to the attacks, this is it. Period. A lot of the stuff presented is all available to the public but this is where the talent of Mazzucco shows and reminds us how powerful + important the art of film can be really be. I personally put this as the single best expository documentary of the past 10 years.
If you're not ready for 5 hours of this masterpiece, "Decade of Deception" is definitely the best out of any of the rest under 2 hours and it documents an important event related to the movement. I've watched a solid number of the most popular ones and these are the only 2 you need.
If you're not ready for 5 hours of this masterpiece, "Decade of Deception" is definitely the best out of any of the rest under 2 hours and it documents an important event related to the movement. I've watched a solid number of the most popular ones and these are the only 2 you need.
Having also watched Mazzucco's first documentary on 9/11 (in Italian "11 settembre 2001: Inganno Globale") I would definitely recommend this one to anybody who is interested in the events and dark sides of the tragedy. The crucial point here is the set of questions which is posed to the debunkers and the fact that the documentary not only deals with the exposition of the problems and inconsistencies of the official version but also contains constant and precise confutations of all the vague points made by the debunkers themselves against the movement for the truth about 9/11. To be honest, I approach so called "conspiracy theories" with a lot of skepticism, but in this case, given the overwhelming amount of information and scientific data presented in this extensive work I find it very hard not to take a stance. Another fact that needs mentioning is that the documentary is available for free on YouTube by will of the director himself, or you can buy it from an official DVD store and the director himself encourages you to copy it and share it with your friends. That alone is proof to me that this is a serious project, an honest and open demand for truth and not a money grab on some funky story. This is a serious matter, and I believe that anyone who watches the movie will at least admit that the points presented are very scientific and well-researched.
The major problem immediately and in the years after 9/11 is these documentaries leave you with more questions than you have answers and like most people I just said 'maybe, maybe not'.
This documentary proves without shadow of any doubt that the official events of 9/11 that we are supposed to believe as fact are completely false. I've watched this documentary 4 times now and my skeptical friends have also sat through it and we are all in agreement. False.
The documentary doesn't prove every aspect of 9/11 as 'conspiracy,' in particular, what happened to the passengers? "It's a frame" Maybe...but where did that poor lady go? Wonderfully though, the documentary after each part simply asks vital questions for each argument - instead of telling us what is what. That's crucial.
Where it slams home is the towers themselves. Wonderful, wonderful wonderful. Proves without doubt the towers came down with controlled demolition as any other explanation breaks the laws of physics, hahahaha!! I was happy that awful argument about heated metal was laid to bed. The amount of leading professionals from pilots to engineers who have joined forces to reveal what happened that day with science is overwhelming.
Give it your time and you will not be disappointing.
This documentary proves without shadow of any doubt that the official events of 9/11 that we are supposed to believe as fact are completely false. I've watched this documentary 4 times now and my skeptical friends have also sat through it and we are all in agreement. False.
The documentary doesn't prove every aspect of 9/11 as 'conspiracy,' in particular, what happened to the passengers? "It's a frame" Maybe...but where did that poor lady go? Wonderfully though, the documentary after each part simply asks vital questions for each argument - instead of telling us what is what. That's crucial.
Where it slams home is the towers themselves. Wonderful, wonderful wonderful. Proves without doubt the towers came down with controlled demolition as any other explanation breaks the laws of physics, hahahaha!! I was happy that awful argument about heated metal was laid to bed. The amount of leading professionals from pilots to engineers who have joined forces to reveal what happened that day with science is overwhelming.
Give it your time and you will not be disappointing.
10cheekyma
The best and most revealing insight into the most insidious cover-up in the history of time .
From defying the basic principles of gravity to lying , obfuscation and lack of evidence to support "Theory".
I am firmly in the camp of A&E.
This is the accounting of the truth ,the NIST report is the conspiracy .
Watch alongside "911 The myth and the reality" .
From defying the basic principles of gravity to lying , obfuscation and lack of evidence to support "Theory".
I am firmly in the camp of A&E.
This is the accounting of the truth ,the NIST report is the conspiracy .
Watch alongside "911 The myth and the reality" .
Você sabia?
- Citações
Lt.Col. Robert M. Bowman: I am an old interceptor-pilot, and it's absolutely unbelievable that hijacked airliners could fly around for an hour and 40 minutes without being intercepted.
- ConexõesFeatured in 9/11: Take the Quiz (2019)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is September 11: The New Pearl Harbor?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- 11 Septembre, le nouveau Pearl Harbor
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was September 11: The New Pearl Harbor (2013) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda