Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Woodshock

  • 2017
  • R
  • 1h 40m
IMDb RATING
4.2/10
2.5K
YOUR RATING
Kirsten Dunst in Woodshock (2017)
Theresa, a haunted young woman spiraling in the wake of profound loss, finds herself torn between her fractured emotional state and the reality-altering effects of a potent cannabinoid drug.
Play trailer1:46
2 Videos
59 Photos
Psychological DramaDramaFantasyMysteryThriller

A woman, consumed by profound grief after a personal loss, aided by a potent drug meant for the terminally ill, delves into her psyche for solace set in the hauntingly beautiful redwood fore... Read allA woman, consumed by profound grief after a personal loss, aided by a potent drug meant for the terminally ill, delves into her psyche for solace set in the hauntingly beautiful redwood forests.A woman, consumed by profound grief after a personal loss, aided by a potent drug meant for the terminally ill, delves into her psyche for solace set in the hauntingly beautiful redwood forests.

  • Directors
    • Kate Mulleavy
    • Laura Mulleavy
  • Writers
    • Kate Mulleavy
    • Laura Mulleavy
  • Stars
    • Kirsten Dunst
    • Joe Cole
    • Pilou Asbæk
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.2/10
    2.5K
    YOUR RATING
    • Directors
      • Kate Mulleavy
      • Laura Mulleavy
    • Writers
      • Kate Mulleavy
      • Laura Mulleavy
    • Stars
      • Kirsten Dunst
      • Joe Cole
      • Pilou Asbæk
    • 26User reviews
    • 47Critic reviews
    • 39Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos2

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:46
    Official Trailer
    Woodshock Trailer
    Trailer 1:46
    Woodshock Trailer
    Woodshock Trailer
    Trailer 1:46
    Woodshock Trailer

    Photos58

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 53
    View Poster

    Top cast12

    Edit
    Kirsten Dunst
    Kirsten Dunst
    • Theresa
    Joe Cole
    Joe Cole
    • Nick
    Pilou Asbæk
    Pilou Asbæk
    • Keith
    Steph DuVall
    Steph DuVall
    • Ed
    • (as Stephan DuVall)
    Jack Kilmer
    Jack Kilmer
    • Johnny
    Susan Traylor
    Susan Traylor
    • Theresa's Mother
    Joel McCoy
    • Foreman
    Michael Pavlicek
    • Mike
    Joseph Wray Barney
    • Kid at Party #1
    Henry Pokorski
    • Kid at Party #2
    Kyler Jude Hanson
    • Customer
    Damian Lund
    • Bar Patron
    • (uncredited)
    • Directors
      • Kate Mulleavy
      • Laura Mulleavy
    • Writers
      • Kate Mulleavy
      • Laura Mulleavy
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews26

    4.22.5K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5mr_bickle_the_pickle

    The visuals stunning, story lacking.

    I'll admit the film has some very pretty and also trippy visuals that make you really feel like you're in a daze. Which I suppose is the point. To put as in the mindset of Kirsten Dunst's character. And while it excels at that, the film also kind of goes nowhere. Again, maybe that's the point as well. But it doesn't make for a super interesting watch. It's a very slow movie. Kirsten Dunst though does an excellent job. The rest of the cast is fine but not particularly memorable.
    2valis1949

    "In- DUH!- ca" !!!

    The cinematography is very well-done, and that's it for the positives because overall the film is a very slow-moving Wannabe Art Film that's poorly written and slowly devolves into an overblown, confusing downer with little or no meaning. Kirsten Dunst is a tremendous actress, but there is absolutely nothing in this screenplay for her to work with.

    Think- Indica, as in, "in-duh!-ca".
    rambobarbieisba

    Wanna get high?

    This film is terribly amazing, this film is sort of like a good camp film everybody and everything is so serious yet it is all so poorly executed. Mainly the plot is a few things happen then latter the plot may or may not tell you what in the hell was/is going on. Kirsten Dunst is amazing in this film she plays a stoned out of her mind super pot head who is just about always in her underwear or in a dress that is very focused on her boobs and butt.

    The film really goes for a Nicholas Winding Refn/Safdie Brothers kind of neonesc lighting that really doesn't work with the camera movements, though it does add humor. The writing is very lacking and so is the visual story, if you were deaf or blind you'd have even less of an idea as to what is going on then those with both which is still pretty much no idea. There really isn't much of a story and not in a good "where the story lacks everything else expands" kind of way but just in a sort of "weak story that tries to seem deep" kind of way, if that makes any sense. One last critic is that the cinematography really takes me out of the reality of the reality of the films world, it just seems like a visual image not a place I could be or am.

    I do like the film though, it is extremely original in the weirdest way possible, which is fantastic. If you don't take it very seriously you'll have a fun time. I really hope the Mulleavy Sisters make another film because I will definitely watch it.

    (P.S. There's a Galaxie 500 song playing during one of the scenes which is just awesome)
    5rockman182

    Woodshock (2017)

    I thought this looked like Melancholia from the trailer so I was immediately intrigued. I love Kirsten Dunst, I find her very attractive and think she's quite underrated (please see Melancholia and Fargo Season 2 before disagreeing). I generally love independent films that focus on visuals and the aesthetic component of film so I thought I would be in for a treat with Woodshock. Unfortunately though, there is very little to write home about here.

    The film is about Theresa, who recently experienced a tragic loss in her life. She is quite clearly emotionally sunken from the loss and takes a mind and reality altering drug that takes effect on her life. I wish I could say more about the film but its really hard to grasp or explain what else was going on. This isn't even a confusion in a good way. The film has nothing logical going on and doesn't even feel real. It tries to mimic profound films of a minimalist nature but fails to capture any interest or compassion for the work.

    The filming style is worth viewing. Kate and Laura Mulleavy certainly have an eye for cinematic style. The use of superimposition was a huge favorite for this one. Neon lights, hazy atmosphere, and a powerful score also make the technical aspects of the film to look and feel top notch. The film does feel in tune with its drug fueled high atmosphere. That's really it. I think Kirsten Dunst is really good in this. She has really mastered the role of a depressed, grief encompassed woman. She's not at fault for the films shortcomings.

    While I think Kate and Laura Mulleavy impressed with their style, their writing needs more work. Its hard to care and really follow what's going on. I am a patient person for films like this but they have to have a real impact with its minimal story. This film unfortunately does not do that and was a frustrating experience. Definitely not worth the time and effort.

    5/10
    7leannadyer

    Ahead of its time

    I believe this film is ahead of its time. I can appreciate this movie for several reasons 1) I was in the right mental space, I wasn't expecting a lot 2) It reminded me of several films I've watched in a dream in cinema class, therefore I could appreciate the work that was put into this film 3) The cinematography was stunning.

    Sure, if you're looking for a film that has an easy to follow premise, this may not be the movie for you! But if you enjoy symbolism, beautiful shots, and controversial topics, give it a try. I don't think you need to know exactly what is happening in the moment to enjoy a film.

    More like this

    Die My Love
    6.4
    Die My Love
    Together
    6.2
    Together
    Of Love and Shadows
    4.9
    Of Love and Shadows
    All Souls
    4.9
    All Souls
    On the Road
    6.0
    On the Road
    Wonder Seven
    5.5
    Wonder Seven
    Silver Hawk
    5.1
    Silver Hawk
    The Touch
    4.6
    The Touch
    Easy Money
    5.0
    Easy Money
    Aspirational
    7.2
    Aspirational
    Sentimental Value
    7.6
    Sentimental Value
    The Beguiled
    6.3
    The Beguiled

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Kirsten Dunst described her role as the most challenging part she has ever done, even more challenging than her acclaimed roles in Lars von Trier's Melancholia (2011) and the television series Fargo (2015 season).
    • Quotes

      [first lines]

      Theresa: Remember when we used to play in the woods together? I got lost that one summer. When I turned around, you were gone. When they found me, I almost didn't want to come back.

    • Soundtracks
      Guiding Light
      Written by Tom Verlaine (uncredited) and Richard Lloyd

      Performed by Television

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ

    • How long is Woodshock?
      Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • November 8, 2017 (Latvia)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Вудшок
    • Filming locations
      • Eureka, California, USA
    • Production companies
      • COTA Films
      • Live Free or Die Films
      • Waypoint Entertainment
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $5,000,000 (estimated)
    • Gross US & Canada
      • $42,603
    • Opening weekend US & Canada
      • $12,247
      • Sep 24, 2017
    • Gross worldwide
      • $43,682
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      1 hour 40 minutes
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    Kirsten Dunst in Woodshock (2017)
    Top Gap
    By what name was Woodshock (2017) officially released in India in English?
    Answer
    • See more gaps
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.