Charlie's Angels

It's difficult for me to understand the HATE for this movie when you factor out the - honestly cliche - misogyny + self importance combo. And I refuse to believe ALL of its haters are self important misogynists. It's a fun movie. An action comedy production that does not take itself as seriously as the Bond franchise, for example. It's honest and very similar to it's predecessors, with the benefit of better technology and cinematography of its time. Its silly, because it was always supposed to be silly. There's no man hating, AT ALL, no matter what the other reviews say. It is, yes, heavy on its feminism, but I trust by now we learned that feminism does not equal man hating? Good. Kristen Stewart is a gem in this. And I didn't even like her before. Sam Claflin is also, muah. Chefs kiss. Elizabeth Bank's wig could be better. Don't take it so seriously. Have a drink, relax, stop wanting every movie to be a masterpiece even when it doesn't promise to be. I honest to God loved this one. Couldn't watch it in the movies, but it's practically on repeat on my TV. (The only unforgivable sin was Sabina's Portuguese on the beggining. Yikes)

While it isn't/wasn't a blockbuster movie, nor did it star huge Hollywood names I think it deserves a shot.

I found it to be a nice blend of comedy and action.

My husband and I just watched this and we thought it was great! It was funny and action packed. Highly recommended. People need to stop picking apart every little thing and just enjoy stuff.

Tons of fun. Fits perfectly in the genre of silly action movie that doesn't try to be realistic or serious. Along the lines of The Fast and the Furious.

All of the main characters have a good dose of personality, and they're all fun to watch, and clearly having fun making it, Jane to a lesser extent, but she is playing the serious character, so not really her fault.

It's a pretty funny movie, mostly intentional, but there are also a few moments of unintentional humor that just add to the intentional humor. The setting montages are poorly edited, but this ends up adding to the goodness of the movie because they're so good-bad. The CGI is similar in this regard. There are a couple moments when it looks rather cheap. But as I said, it just adds on to the healthy dose of intentional humor.

Some people are saying this reboot was pointless or unnecessary, but I disagree. It's been a long time since the last Charlie's Angels. I watched it not long ago and it felt so dated it lost my attention. I'm not saying it's bad, but it's very much from a different era.

For the record, I would actually give this an 8/10, but since all the butthurt neck beards with fragile egos are giving this 1s and 2s, I'm trying to restore balance to the force.

The kind of Angels films were never supposed to be serious, why most of people take it so serious to watch and bang them mercilessly afterwards is way over my head. It's a fun watch with all the silliness come with it, ain't it?