14 reviews
Esther is the head of a family running a cattle ranch in Mexico. She starts an affair with a ranch hand. Her husband Juan has to deal with their open relationship and her volatility.
This reminds me a lot of Terrence Malick. It's like the filmmaker is trying to be the Mexican Malick. It's not everyone's taste. I would skip the more experimental shots like the mechanical insides of the vehicle. I get his intention to make the sex more brutal and less romantic. The horse goring scene is truly shocking. I had to stop because I lost the thread of the story. I kept thinking if they used a real horse. It looks so real. My main issue with this movie is that it mainly follows the wrong character. Juan's emotional journey is the main story and it holds the possibility of a great shock ending. I thought that the horse goring is some sort of foreshadowing. All in all, the filmmaking is masterful. The subject matter is interesting. It is long at three hours. That probably drove away most people.
This reminds me a lot of Terrence Malick. It's like the filmmaker is trying to be the Mexican Malick. It's not everyone's taste. I would skip the more experimental shots like the mechanical insides of the vehicle. I get his intention to make the sex more brutal and less romantic. The horse goring scene is truly shocking. I had to stop because I lost the thread of the story. I kept thinking if they used a real horse. It looks so real. My main issue with this movie is that it mainly follows the wrong character. Juan's emotional journey is the main story and it holds the possibility of a great shock ending. I thought that the horse goring is some sort of foreshadowing. All in all, the filmmaking is masterful. The subject matter is interesting. It is long at three hours. That probably drove away most people.
- SnoopyStyle
- Nov 3, 2021
- Permalink
Masterpiece. Dark. But amazing. Reygadas as always plays with the language of film.
Carlos Reygadas's cinema is one of meticulous observation and grandiose revelations. Casting himself and his real-life wife, the Mexican auteur boldly explores with spellbinding visuals the dark corners of relationships, dissecting patriarchy along the way. A domestic drama of majestic proportions.
Carlos Reygadas's cinema is one of meticulous observation and grandiose revelations. Casting himself and his real-life wife, the Mexican auteur boldly explores with spellbinding visuals the dark corners of relationships, dissecting patriarchy along the way. A domestic drama of majestic proportions.
- yusufpiskin
- Feb 7, 2021
- Permalink
All been said before, right, especially as regards adultery in the cultured classes?
Not with Reygadas. Here's a man who's really prepared to give the genres a nudge, really has the chops to pull it off.
Starting with no intro, and seemingly innocent scenes of kids playing at a lake, Reygadas carries 170 stylish minutes better than most directors carry 90.
There is a narrative arc, but Our Time deliberately operates at its edges. Characters argue off screen. Husband writes to wife. Does same, to wife's lover. Daughter comes on, for a couple of voice-overs. There's horse- and cow-play aplenty, often bearing a jagged relation to what's going down with the humans.
Reygadas still needs his get-out-of-jail card, to take the movie to the next level. This arrives with a late detonation, when the husband visits a dying friend.
As a full on movie addict, it's a surprise to feel sudden tears, in real time. This did it for me. One to remember.
Not with Reygadas. Here's a man who's really prepared to give the genres a nudge, really has the chops to pull it off.
Starting with no intro, and seemingly innocent scenes of kids playing at a lake, Reygadas carries 170 stylish minutes better than most directors carry 90.
There is a narrative arc, but Our Time deliberately operates at its edges. Characters argue off screen. Husband writes to wife. Does same, to wife's lover. Daughter comes on, for a couple of voice-overs. There's horse- and cow-play aplenty, often bearing a jagged relation to what's going down with the humans.
Reygadas still needs his get-out-of-jail card, to take the movie to the next level. This arrives with a late detonation, when the husband visits a dying friend.
As a full on movie addict, it's a surprise to feel sudden tears, in real time. This did it for me. One to remember.
Carlos Reygadas movies are a bit of a hit or miss with me. He's also an acquired taste as all of his movies are very different from mainstream movies and I understand if they rub people the wrong way. The deliberate pacing, the graphic sex scenes, the rural setting are enough reasons to discourage some people but, if it has an interesting story behind all this I usually like his movies. And I'm glad to say that this one is a winner for me. Again, most of his trademarks are there, and it is a three hour movie but I found this marriage story to be very engaging. It even gains an extra layer when you realize that the actors playing the couple are real life husband and wife and he is also the director. Who needs therapy when you can lay it all bare in a movie... Anyway, it is a very well directed movie and I found the cinematography breathtaking but I think it all rests on the shoulders of both actors to carry the movie and make you care for their relationship and they completely nail it. So, if you're a bit tired of all the Hollywood same old same old you might want to give this movie a chance.
Last month each viewing of The Souvenir lifted me one step into an aesthetic that I couldn't initially appreciate. And now it's happening again, with Our Time, by Carlos Reygadas. (The reviews on Metacritic are abysmally low.)
My first viewing, last night, was similar to that of at least one reviewer. In the middle of an interesting or puzzling shot, your heart breaks open and you haven't the faintest idea why. Has the spaciousness of the landscape prepared you? Or the passage of time? Or the tension? At the end (or in my case, as always, the next morning) you are left with such sadness. For...? For the human condition?
In his first sentence one reviewer calls the film "spiritual." Yes, at times wasn't there the sense of something beneath the surface, silent, all-embracing? Needs to be seen again.
My first viewing, last night, was similar to that of at least one reviewer. In the middle of an interesting or puzzling shot, your heart breaks open and you haven't the faintest idea why. Has the spaciousness of the landscape prepared you? Or the passage of time? Or the tension? At the end (or in my case, as always, the next morning) you are left with such sadness. For...? For the human condition?
In his first sentence one reviewer calls the film "spiritual." Yes, at times wasn't there the sense of something beneath the surface, silent, all-embracing? Needs to be seen again.
- dennis-11345
- Jun 30, 2019
- Permalink
... a decent enough film... she's very-enticing-alluring... Our Time (Nuestro Tiempo) a saga-length-movie that's not an epic story... just a very long tale about pitfalls of one-open-relationship failing-marriage... very pretty looking, once you adjust to looking at various scenes for long stretches of time (much-lengthy-drone-footage, at times narrated)... films from creators that embody in their personal lives lots of what's in their work, somewhat mirroring their own lives are interesting... here this husband and wife team are portraying another husband and wife couple on a large Mexican ranch, and as so happens, it is 'their' ranch... there are lots of parts to this film.. scenes to be watched again independent of the entire movie, and they lose little of their influence
... so the story goes... the couple have three children, lots of help (appearing wealthy, he's a well known-established poet), and are partaking in an 'open' relationship, both having sex with others... yet in the film, we only see her with other men, not him with anyone... he's more the conspirator-voyeur as it pertains to her sex life... we don't even ever see them having sex together, (getting impression she's past that aspect of their relationship)... he speaks with the men, arranging for them to hook-up with her, and when possible he watches, or gets-insisting-on details from her regarding her sexual-encounters, then at times berates her for what naturally occurs during these-arranged-hookups... a very fancy (did mention lengthy, right) troubled-marriage-drama
... trouble arising, once she 'engages' with one of the ranch-hands (a 'gringo').. after having a hot-mid-afternoon-tryst with him, once returning home, without informing her husband (he found-out) .. seems they have an 'agreement-to-tell' each-other all... from there-on, it's all him confronting-her, being jealous-possessive, and her pushing away from him, because of his controlling-nature... fed up with his obsessions, she mostly desires being increasingly-distant from him... she knows she's better than any of them, and wants her independence to be free from all these conniving-controlling-men... is she in 'love' with this neighbor-rancher, could be.. after all she had fallen-hard in love with her husband, when he was then married, 15 years ago... with this new lover now also married, maybe she's just doing it over again to another man's wife
... very well acted, and produced, Natalia Lopez stands-out, enticing-throughout... it is half-hour/more too-lengthy, where scenes linger, and you find yourself asking when are they going to be over... anyway, it is one of those 'creative' works where reading several critics-reviews can be helpful... and once you have, another watch of the film could-should be in order, to get an expanded-more-informed vision of this work... is it a "masterpiece"... yes'es and no's are aplenty.
... best scene: ... when her lover along with his wife visit their ranch one evening, and her husband after convincing-insisting that she goes off to have sex with him... he then sneaks over to the casita they're in.. peeking through the windows watching them kiss-fondle-hookup, he then goes inside, standing at foot of the bed they're sharing... his wife wrapped arm-leg over the man's-torso, her head nestled on his chest, sharing an after-sex cigarette... neither of the naked-pair showing-having any concern-reaction towards the intruding-husband in the least... thus, entirely-encapsulating-all, regarding the completely-eroded-state of their-ending-marriage
.
... so the story goes... the couple have three children, lots of help (appearing wealthy, he's a well known-established poet), and are partaking in an 'open' relationship, both having sex with others... yet in the film, we only see her with other men, not him with anyone... he's more the conspirator-voyeur as it pertains to her sex life... we don't even ever see them having sex together, (getting impression she's past that aspect of their relationship)... he speaks with the men, arranging for them to hook-up with her, and when possible he watches, or gets-insisting-on details from her regarding her sexual-encounters, then at times berates her for what naturally occurs during these-arranged-hookups... a very fancy (did mention lengthy, right) troubled-marriage-drama
... trouble arising, once she 'engages' with one of the ranch-hands (a 'gringo').. after having a hot-mid-afternoon-tryst with him, once returning home, without informing her husband (he found-out) .. seems they have an 'agreement-to-tell' each-other all... from there-on, it's all him confronting-her, being jealous-possessive, and her pushing away from him, because of his controlling-nature... fed up with his obsessions, she mostly desires being increasingly-distant from him... she knows she's better than any of them, and wants her independence to be free from all these conniving-controlling-men... is she in 'love' with this neighbor-rancher, could be.. after all she had fallen-hard in love with her husband, when he was then married, 15 years ago... with this new lover now also married, maybe she's just doing it over again to another man's wife
... very well acted, and produced, Natalia Lopez stands-out, enticing-throughout... it is half-hour/more too-lengthy, where scenes linger, and you find yourself asking when are they going to be over... anyway, it is one of those 'creative' works where reading several critics-reviews can be helpful... and once you have, another watch of the film could-should be in order, to get an expanded-more-informed vision of this work... is it a "masterpiece"... yes'es and no's are aplenty.
... best scene: ... when her lover along with his wife visit their ranch one evening, and her husband after convincing-insisting that she goes off to have sex with him... he then sneaks over to the casita they're in.. peeking through the windows watching them kiss-fondle-hookup, he then goes inside, standing at foot of the bed they're sharing... his wife wrapped arm-leg over the man's-torso, her head nestled on his chest, sharing an after-sex cigarette... neither of the naked-pair showing-having any concern-reaction towards the intruding-husband in the least... thus, entirely-encapsulating-all, regarding the completely-eroded-state of their-ending-marriage
.
Carlos Reygadas has become one of the greatest film-makers of our time. All his films have been great works, but this is his first masterpiece, exploring most of the same central themes of marriage, fidelity, infidelity and ranching that his two previous films ('Silent Light' and 'Post Tenebras Lux') have, but with more coherence and focus than 'Post Tenebras Lux', and more depth than either of them.
Nothing about movies engages me as much as masterful cinematography, and I've encountered very, very few directors whose cameras have awed me with their grace, uniquity and creativity as much as Reygadas has with his more recent works. The visual texture of the Digital Cinema Package format is definitely a hindrance, but this is easily the most visually astounding film I've ever seen made with it. Over and over and over again, I found myself asking 'How in the hell does this man DO it?'
Nothing about movies engages me as much as masterful cinematography, and I've encountered very, very few directors whose cameras have awed me with their grace, uniquity and creativity as much as Reygadas has with his more recent works. The visual texture of the Digital Cinema Package format is definitely a hindrance, but this is easily the most visually astounding film I've ever seen made with it. Over and over and over again, I found myself asking 'How in the hell does this man DO it?'
- Brian_McInnis
- Nov 13, 2019
- Permalink
The theme and its treatment are a bit 1966 age: free love and open couples, with the underlying condition that everybody can "experience" others sexually, since real and deep love is between man and wife.
But... When arrives a Phil, that can actually push off former "love", problems arise, and hausband get jealous.
But he's not fihgting with physical strenght, like the bulls he breeds; he accuses instead his friend of being unloyal... but actually Carlos at the beginning was not angry of his wife having sex with Phil.
So the story is pretty confused, while dialogues have parts of cold logic, to unfold and manage the situation.
In substance, the bottom line could be that Carlos wants to be sure that he is loved, and for that, he pushes his wife in bed with other men, checking out if she still loves him... It has to said that images are very intriguing, camera, mouvements and all visual aspects are very fine.
But... When arrives a Phil, that can actually push off former "love", problems arise, and hausband get jealous.
But he's not fihgting with physical strenght, like the bulls he breeds; he accuses instead his friend of being unloyal... but actually Carlos at the beginning was not angry of his wife having sex with Phil.
So the story is pretty confused, while dialogues have parts of cold logic, to unfold and manage the situation.
In substance, the bottom line could be that Carlos wants to be sure that he is loved, and for that, he pushes his wife in bed with other men, checking out if she still loves him... It has to said that images are very intriguing, camera, mouvements and all visual aspects are very fine.
- decristofaro11
- Jul 25, 2021
- Permalink
In simple and plain words, film trash, good photography but terrible script. There is no climax, it is unnecessarily long and annoyingly slow (infinitely long tree or house plans). Dialogues that pretend to be cultured are only a sample of the level of pretension that endures throughout the tape. And the final scene of the bulls painfully made, with haze included to save CGI, which by the way is of a rather questionable quality. If you want to lose 3 hours of your life and do not know how to do it, look no further, here is the solution.
PD: Sorry for my bad English.
- STAY_resumenes
- Mar 31, 2020
- Permalink
Fantastic movie for exploring the thrills and angst of the lifestyle. Bravely filmed with moving emotion.
- vinitmdoshi
- Nov 23, 2020
- Permalink
- stevenyc-86318
- Nov 17, 2021
- Permalink
As an Australian watching this narrative unfold in a Mexican life unknown to me was both refreshing and original. Especially the cinematography and slow yet precise direction. Kudos.
As exciting as anything by Kelly Reickards .... you'll quit after 40 minutes, I guess and hope !
- Elisabetha49
- Jul 25, 2021
- Permalink
- Elisabetha49
- Jul 25, 2021
- Permalink