Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.
- Awards
- 6 nominations total
Browse episodes
7.449K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
disappointing:(
To be honest i didn't like this at all. i LOVE gilmore girls, but this didn't even feel like gilmore girls. i regret watching it. it was very boring and ruined a lot of characters for me. i recommend not watching this. i'm honestly surprised it has such a high rating.
Idk if they had a plan before they started filming or not
Why was there so much singing? Why was Rory kind of a bad person? Why couldn't Luke and Loralai have figured it out by now? Why wasn't this show true to the original series at all? These were all the thoughts that ran through my head while watching this show
Boring Conclusion
The overrated Palladinos should have left well enough alone. This overlong (should've been two, not four, episodes) revisits Stars Hollow Connecticut 10 years or so later. Most of the characters are the same. Rory is the most disappointing. She's still floundering career wise, with questionable moral center. She's dragging this guy around for two years who she has no interest in, while being intimate with a man engaged to be married. (A repeat of the Dean sexcapade of years earlier). Lorelei can be proud and disgusted with her at the same time. Other predictable plot devices are thrown in. Emily reigns supreme, as always. Kelly Bishop is an amazing actress. She was the best this series had to offer. It's nice to see many of the old faces, some briefly, but overall, it could and should've been a whole lot better. How Taylor and Kirk survived without being 'eliminated' is amazing. Thankfully no sign of April Nardini.👏. Even the cliffhanger was boring. Time for the Palladinos to close this saga down for good.
Hoping for a second "sequel" but...
Stop with the musicals!!!!! Ugh!! And give Rory a back bone and a brain!!
Would love to see how it plays out after the ending of this one.
Would love to see how it plays out after the ending of this one.
Not worth it
I can't speak for everyone, but I think a fair amount of GG fans would agree with me: what we wanted in a reunion series was more of the first 5 seasons, not more of the last 2. It's been 10 years and somehow everyone is only just now finding themselves? Luke and Lorelai have NEVER talked about whether to have kids and only now want to get married? Rory is ambling around befuddled about who to sleep with and where to live? Actually bring some closure to the story and give fans some satisfaction in watching their favorite characters find fulfillment and happiness. What's the point of doing a reunion series if they're all just as aimless as they were in season 7 and the show ends on some open-ended cliffhanger that leaves us all throwing our hands up all over again. The writing and acting tries too hard and falls very flat. You don't gain anything from this series and in fact lose a lot of the magic and sense of hope you were left with in 2007.
Did you know
- TriviaPaul Anka is again portrayed by the same dog actor named Sparky. He's a Polish Lowland Sheepdog and was 14 years old when the revival, A Year in the Life, hit Netflix
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Gilmore Girls: سنة في العمر
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 33m(93 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






