IMDb RATING
5.8/10
4.2K
YOUR RATING
Martin's daughter, Emma, takes up a night watch job to find out what happened to her parents almost thirty years ago. A meeting with Wörmer in his cell pulls the serial killer out of his com... Read allMartin's daughter, Emma, takes up a night watch job to find out what happened to her parents almost thirty years ago. A meeting with Wörmer in his cell pulls the serial killer out of his coma and sets in motion a chain of fateful events.Martin's daughter, Emma, takes up a night watch job to find out what happened to her parents almost thirty years ago. A meeting with Wörmer in his cell pulls the serial killer out of his coma and sets in motion a chain of fateful events.
- Awards
- 5 nominations total
Nina Terese Rask
- Maria
- (as Nina Rask)
Tina Gylling Mortensen
- Henriques
- (as Tina Gylling)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.84.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Horrible work
To be totally honest.. Its a stinker. And i have a hard time figuring out why people can actually give it a good rating. A film made at this 'level' have to perfom better. It solely lives on the name.
Which sucks, because the first one is so good. Already in the beginning there is some of the worst dubbing work I've ever seen in a film, ever. The whole setup is just so bad. The pacing is off and in general the work takes you away from the movies. Not that the plot is good. The story is in general thin as paper, and you sit with that feeling that the protagonist's action is so unreal. In know we talk about a film here, but come on. Its not good, and a real disappointment.
Cant recommend.
Which sucks, because the first one is so good. Already in the beginning there is some of the worst dubbing work I've ever seen in a film, ever. The whole setup is just so bad. The pacing is off and in general the work takes you away from the movies. Not that the plot is good. The story is in general thin as paper, and you sit with that feeling that the protagonist's action is so unreal. In know we talk about a film here, but come on. Its not good, and a real disappointment.
Cant recommend.
Review for people that have never seen the original
First of all I have to say that I never saw the original movie, so if you are here to see if this would compare to that movie, then this review might not be the one for you.
But since I write a review to every new horror movie I see, I won't make an exception for this one. I read a plot synopsis of the original one so I had some idea what the past of this movie would be. I found my way around the plot pretty quickly and it didn't take long to see how the characters worked and what type of people they were.
In the intro sequence there's a scene where a young man bashes his head against a unidirectional perspective glass in an interrogation room and the effects looked a little wonky which made me skeptical at first. However since the movie barely uses any CGI, that was the only time that I noticed flaws with the effects. The movie is written by the same writer and there are some characters coming back from the 1994 original which will definitely please some fans.
However the movie is rather slow and with almost two hours of runtime I think it really dragged. This could have been a 90-minute movie and it would be equally as enjoyable if not more. Also the movie introduces a really generic twist which felt unoriginal and lazy. I think if you are a big fan of the original movie you might get something from this sequel, however if you have never seen it like me, this movie doesn't provide much entertainment and therefore doesn't manage to stand on it's own. [5,1/10]
But since I write a review to every new horror movie I see, I won't make an exception for this one. I read a plot synopsis of the original one so I had some idea what the past of this movie would be. I found my way around the plot pretty quickly and it didn't take long to see how the characters worked and what type of people they were.
In the intro sequence there's a scene where a young man bashes his head against a unidirectional perspective glass in an interrogation room and the effects looked a little wonky which made me skeptical at first. However since the movie barely uses any CGI, that was the only time that I noticed flaws with the effects. The movie is written by the same writer and there are some characters coming back from the 1994 original which will definitely please some fans.
However the movie is rather slow and with almost two hours of runtime I think it really dragged. This could have been a 90-minute movie and it would be equally as enjoyable if not more. Also the movie introduces a really generic twist which felt unoriginal and lazy. I think if you are a big fan of the original movie you might get something from this sequel, however if you have never seen it like me, this movie doesn't provide much entertainment and therefore doesn't manage to stand on it's own. [5,1/10]
Stunning
It has been almost 30 years since the events of the original. Martin is kind of a wreck; he doesn't work, doesn't receive welfare and takes too many pills. His daughter Emma is trying to help, but he's very resistant to it. Neither of them have properly processed the suicide of Kalinka. So one day she does something she feels is definitely going to make it better. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
A major theme here is the way that trauma has a ripple effect. And how something intended to improve things can actually worsen them. The terror is in part derived from this, thus making it more effective than if it truly was something as banal (at this point in genre fiction) as merely a serial killer. The mystery is compelling, and though I applied myself, I did not deduce the identity of the murderer. This has amazing cinematography and editing, which truly do hold you in a vice grip in the scariest scenes. Movies like this can get a significant boost out of credible characterization. Maria feels like a real person; she is not confined by stereotypical femininity. The acting and the chemistry is all convincing.
This features brief sexuality, a little strong bloody violence and gore, and some swearing. I recommend this to fans of Horror. 7/10.
A major theme here is the way that trauma has a ripple effect. And how something intended to improve things can actually worsen them. The terror is in part derived from this, thus making it more effective than if it truly was something as banal (at this point in genre fiction) as merely a serial killer. The mystery is compelling, and though I applied myself, I did not deduce the identity of the murderer. This has amazing cinematography and editing, which truly do hold you in a vice grip in the scariest scenes. Movies like this can get a significant boost out of credible characterization. Maria feels like a real person; she is not confined by stereotypical femininity. The acting and the chemistry is all convincing.
This features brief sexuality, a little strong bloody violence and gore, and some swearing. I recommend this to fans of Horror. 7/10.
A alright sequel
The movie is entertaining, but drags out quite a bit with it's 2 hour run time.
In my oppinion they try too hard and too many times to make references back to the first movie, and it kinda sours the experience as just wanting to bait for nostalgia.
I also feel they use too many unnecessary English translated words, being used in a unrealistic manner, such as the commissioner, using "Case", and Emma saying "Gun" instead of the Danish "Pistol", and a couple others I can't quite recall.
In my oppinion they try too hard and too many times to make references back to the first movie, and it kinda sours the experience as just wanting to bait for nostalgia.
I also feel they use too many unnecessary English translated words, being used in a unrealistic manner, such as the commissioner, using "Case", and Emma saying "Gun" instead of the Danish "Pistol", and a couple others I can't quite recall.
Strong Start, Disappointing Finish
The first half of Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever starts strong, with a thrilling atmosphere that pulls you in. However, the second half disappoints-the motives behind the revenge plot are confusing, storytelling becomes unclear, and it loses the initial momentum. Overall, not a satisfying conclusion. AVERAGE.
Did you know
- TriviaLotte Andersen was offered to reprise the role as Lotte, Godmother of Emma, but declined as she couldn't see herself in the role.
- GoofsIn the scene with the priest in the car, the inside car manufacturer logo at the steering wheel is VW, but when you see the car from the outside, it is a Citroën...
- ConnectionsFollows Nightwatch (1994)
- How long is Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Nattvakten - Demons Are Forever
- Filming locations
- Aarhus Amtssygehus, Aarhus, Denmark(Hospital, psychiatric hospital, forensic institute)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- €4,300,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $104,266
- Runtime
- 1h 58m(118 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




