A young couple arrives in New York for a weekend and meet with bad weather and a series of adventures.A young couple arrives in New York for a weekend and meet with bad weather and a series of adventures.A young couple arrives in New York for a weekend and meet with bad weather and a series of adventures.
- Awards
- 3 wins total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
6.457.1K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
nice little film
It doesn't rank with the best Woody Allen movies, but it's a nice little film. There is a suspenseful and sad scene where Elle Fanning's character is mistreated by a slimy Lothario; her exfiltration from his flat counterpoints the Timothée Chalamet character's comical flight through an art museum. There is a touching, albeit far-fetched, reconciliation between a mother and son. The dialogue requires suspension of disbelief, and the many romantic betrayals never cut
very deep.
First Lesson for a Writer. Write about What You Know
In the age of super hero films I'm glad that there is still someone who is making films with witty dialog. Woody Allen should be praised for that.
But in this film neither the dialog nor the story works.
"Hannah and Her Sisters" works so well because Woody Allen understood these characters--how they talk and behave. He knew how to write for them.
That was 1986. Now it's 2019.
21-year-olds in 2019 don't say "I need a drink, a cigarette and a Berlin ballad." No matter what their background that's not how they would talk.
"A Rainy Day in New York" is filled with references that no one born in the late 1990s would have. Songs by Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. Films from the 1930s and 40s. And the name of the lead character, Gatsby Welles, is just a little too cute. All of these are Woody Allen references. The problem is trying to force these references on these characters. It doesn't work.
Maybe this film is meant to be a fantasy. It's not how 21-year-olds talk and behave in the modern world. It's how Woody Allen wishes they talked and behaved.
No one wants to see a film about people staring into their phones but the truth is that the two leading characters would have been texting each other every few minutes and wouldn't have gotten so completely separated from each other. I think it's clear that Woody Allen hates cell phones because they get in the way of his stories.
I would have suggested two important changes to the film. Have it take place 25 years earlier--1994 instead of 2019, before everyone had their own phone--and make the characters in their mid-30s instead of their early 20s. With those two changes I think this would be remembered as one of Woody Allen's better films. As it stands he's created characters he doesn't know or understand and, unfortunately, it shows.
"Hannah and Her Sisters" works so well because Woody Allen understood these characters--how they talk and behave. He knew how to write for them.
That was 1986. Now it's 2019.
21-year-olds in 2019 don't say "I need a drink, a cigarette and a Berlin ballad." No matter what their background that's not how they would talk.
"A Rainy Day in New York" is filled with references that no one born in the late 1990s would have. Songs by Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. Films from the 1930s and 40s. And the name of the lead character, Gatsby Welles, is just a little too cute. All of these are Woody Allen references. The problem is trying to force these references on these characters. It doesn't work.
Maybe this film is meant to be a fantasy. It's not how 21-year-olds talk and behave in the modern world. It's how Woody Allen wishes they talked and behaved.
No one wants to see a film about people staring into their phones but the truth is that the two leading characters would have been texting each other every few minutes and wouldn't have gotten so completely separated from each other. I think it's clear that Woody Allen hates cell phones because they get in the way of his stories.
I would have suggested two important changes to the film. Have it take place 25 years earlier--1994 instead of 2019, before everyone had their own phone--and make the characters in their mid-30s instead of their early 20s. With those two changes I think this would be remembered as one of Woody Allen's better films. As it stands he's created characters he doesn't know or understand and, unfortunately, it shows.
What you would expect
Everything you would expect from a Woody Allen film taking place in New York City. Great dialogue and a decent story with great acting.
A rainy day in NY - or Everything I wish happened to me in one single day!
Nothing too surprising. This is Woody Allen in Manhattan.
"A rainy day in New York" came to me as a rather naive and refreshing way of doing what W Allen does. Gastby and Ashleigh question what they are and what they are becoming. They do that - to my perception - through the eyes of someone of their age. They think but do not overthink. Action immediately follows. They do not get lost in doubts and do not have to deal with an ego bigger than them. They act, they feel, they learn and repeat. They have so much to learn from that one day. I found all three young characters likeable and empowered, and the actors on top of their game (Timothee Chalamet, Elle Fanning and Selena Gomez). I would have loved to spend that day by their side The rain never bothered me anyways.
A true piece of cinema 8/10
Woody Allen keeps showing why he is one of the best things to ever happen to cinema. Why we need him so much. without Allen, the cinema industry would have been a little boring. His films are unique and very powerful by meaning of beauty, art and emotion. "A Rainy Day in New York" is another perfect example of true art. The film stars with a young couple visiting New York for the weekend and end up in a rainy day full of excitements. The movie feels like another Allen love story from the start: the location of New York, the narrating, the differences between characters, how they fall in love against all chances, and the sweet ending that all viewers wish to have in their lives. When I first saw this film I immediately had a sense of nostalgia towards "Manhattan" and "Annie Hall". All films perfectly connect to each other, not by plot but more in a sense of genre and dialogue. The dialogues in this film are just like in any other of Allen's films, catchy, humorous and with a lot of sense towards life. The cast is amazing: Timothèe Chalamet is wonderful, his character resembles a lot of Allen's performance in his other films. Basically it's the same character but different actor. Selena Gomez is adorable and shines in her role, Elle Fanning is humorous, the entire cast works so well with the genre of the film. Overall I am in love with this film, I enjoyed it so much and I recommend it to everyone, I think this is my new favorite Allen movie.
Did you know
- TriviaWith this film being "shelved" by controversy and not released as originally intended, 2018 marks the first time since 1981 that Woody Allen did not have a feature film released in theaters. In fact, since his directorial debut in Take the Money and Run (1969), Allen has written and directed a feature film in every single subsequent year except for 1970, 1974, 1976, 1981, and now 2018. So, in the past 50 years, there have only been 5 years in total in which the world has not seen a Woody Allen film released in theaters.
- GoofsIn the restaurant, when Ashleigh asks Francisco Vega what wine they are drinking, he says Chateau Meyney, but it's actually from Chateau Margaux.
- Quotes
Chan Tyrell: Real life is fine for people who can't do any better.
- ConnectionsFeatured in MsMojo: Every Timothée Chalamet Movie, Ranked from Worst to Best (2022)
- SoundtracksI Got Lucky in the Rain
Composed by Harold Adamson & Jimmy McHugh
Performed by Bing Crosby
Courtesy of HLC Properties, Ltd.
- How long is A Rainy Day in New York?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Un día lluvioso en Nueva York
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $25,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $23,805,899
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.00 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






