In the Cloud

Like most of the movies starred Justin Chatwin, this is over the head for most of the viewers. As a sci-fi thriller film it focuses on a tech company, which is developing software capable of uploading a person's consciousness and memories to a virtual space. There is a lot of psychedelic drug referenced and shown used in the movie. But there is no special sort of instrument is shown in here, that's a huge downside. What is the fun and benefit of a sci-fi film, if you can't see a few future technology.

Out of three reviews, two of them are gushing 10-star from people who only signed up to IMDB a week or two ago and have no activity other than leaving those reviews. Don't trust them.

Amazing cast overall, justin chatwin managed to make believable a character that would sound impossible if described to you, smart, laid back, serious but careless and pretty funny when needed, he guides you through a not so impossible future where we choose between morals or actions that might do more bad than good. the visuals in this feature are not just original but clever, combining several principles in a unique way the movie manages to have its own personal visual concept while keeping it simple and sublte. this visuals play an active role in complimenting this story which takes you through an amazing (and sort of trippy) drive through the human brain.

Great idea, great premise good progression on a tech Sci Fi theory that is looking more and more plausible every day. It holds your attention, then it ends......badly. Why go through with the whole story progression when the end doesn't justify, well, the means? What was the conclusion? The answer was that there wasn't any. If you like tech for its own sake, and a story that forgets to end itself, then this is for you. The only conclusion I can draw here, is that they are making a sequel or a series. But rest assured, this audience member won't bight on watching the sequel. What is it with these low budget producers and their reach that exceeds a grasp ego thats a million light years away from reality? Great acting from Gabriel Byrne and the others was wasted on this thing.

... for the nice aerial shots of "London", and then it's all downhill from there as an inane plot kicks in, executed by awful writing, acting, and most of all, directon and cinematography: 5-second shots with almost constant camera movement within the shots will make most viewers seasick within 15 minutes. No hope of a rescue by interesting plot twists, however, as it's entirely predictable to the end. Amateur hour film-making at its worst.