IMDb RATING
4.4/10
363
YOUR RATING
A woman begins to look into the background of the cop who is investigating her friend's case.A woman begins to look into the background of the cop who is investigating her friend's case.A woman begins to look into the background of the cop who is investigating her friend's case.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.4363
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
For Vegetarians only
You ask why?
Because it's so corny.
Suspenseless
I give it an abysmal 3 out of 10 IMDb rating.
Because it's so corny.
Suspenseless
I give it an abysmal 3 out of 10 IMDb rating.
Kept me entertained
Usually when I watch TV I am on the computer the entire time, but today I watched this movie and actually paid attention to it. I thought it was thrilling and the acting was pretty good.
It isn't that hard to guess the baddie, but this time I didn't mind because I wanted to see what all the person would do. In order for that to happen on screen, it needed to be revealed up front who it was.
I liked the "twist" at the end. I had no trouble hearing a single word due to background noise. What background noise? I'm confused.
It isn't that hard to guess the baddie, but this time I didn't mind because I wanted to see what all the person would do. In order for that to happen on screen, it needed to be revealed up front who it was.
I liked the "twist" at the end. I had no trouble hearing a single word due to background noise. What background noise? I'm confused.
So wooden - should be Who's planking me
Saw this last night, would have turned over but hubby was actually in to it. The acting is so awful - the whole cast surely haven't had an acting lesson in their life??
One to avoid unless you want a showcase in how not to do it.
GREAT Potential, Poorly Executed
The premise of the movie is actually very interesting, and they had a great cast (Michael Welch, in particular) but the dialogue just felt a bit cringey to me. Cheesy may be a better word.
I appreciate the artistry of filmmaking and in that light, I give it a 6/10. I like to find my own symbolism in the movies I watch, something I can grab from it, but it was a little hard to do that with this film.
Strong premise, poorly executed. Michael Welch and Chelsea Ricketts did a wonderful job, given the script they were given to work with. Could have been better.
I appreciate the artistry of filmmaking and in that light, I give it a 6/10. I like to find my own symbolism in the movies I watch, something I can grab from it, but it was a little hard to do that with this film.
Strong premise, poorly executed. Michael Welch and Chelsea Ricketts did a wonderful job, given the script they were given to work with. Could have been better.
typical lifetime love problems movie
This one more out of so many lifetimes typical movies. They are almost all about the same topics like obsession, love, criminal and crime, psychopath. What I did not like is that it is too typical. Nothing new compared to similar movies like "at 17" titles. It is mostly easy to predict, to figure things out, and to conclude the story. What I did like is the professional few acting skills of so young detective. He had courage. Also many realistic things like jealousy and fight of two boys over girl. Feeling of power of one over other. There was turnover in the end but this is so quick, done by force, that it did not improve movie that much. Still not good enough, nothing extra to see compared to other lifetime channel movies.
Did you know
- GoofsAround 44 minutes in,when the detective is leaving Amanda's house with her, he's wearing a light blue shirt, when they arrive at the studio he is now wearing a dark perhaps even black shirt.
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
